IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v29y2024i4p1054-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sugar Rush or Sugar Risk? Experiences with Risks and Risk Management among Young Sugar Daters

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa Dyrvig Henriksen

    (VIVE – The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Denmark)

  • Josefine Frøslev-Thomsen

    (VIVE – The Danish Center for Social Science Research, Denmark)

Abstract

Sugar dating is a complex phenomenon that unfolds on a continuum between traditional dating and sex work. Existing research shows that sugar dating is often portrayed as rife with potential physical and social risks, and from a societal standpoint, it is also often characterized as a risky activity, particularly for young individuals. In this article, we investigate the emergence of these risks and how young sugar daters strategize to minimize them. The findings demonstrate that risk in sugar dating is influenced by complex social and cultural contexts, where especially the stigmatized nature and gendered storyline of sugar dating constitute risks for young sugar daters. These risks are further shaped by the cultural construction of late-modern sexuality, which favours elusive and volatile sexual relations combined with a desire to explore while being young. The young women in this study view sugar dating as a temporary activity that they do not imagine themselves engaging in when they get older. They associate sugar dating with the phase of youth, but unlike other types of youth risk-taking, sugar dating does not occur within the social context of peers. Instead, risk management in the context of sugar dating primarily becomes an individual responsibility, as involving others is perceived as carrying substantial social risks of being labelled as sexually immoral. The study underscores that risk in sugar dating does not exist in a vacuum; rather, it is intertwined with complex social and cultural contexts surrounding sugar dating. By shedding light on these intricate factors, our research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the lived experiences and dynamics of risk management within the realm of sugar dating.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa Dyrvig Henriksen & Josefine Frøslev-Thomsen, 2024. "Sugar Rush or Sugar Risk? Experiences with Risks and Risk Management among Young Sugar Daters," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(4), pages 1054-1069, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:29:y:2024:i:4:p:1054-1069
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804231224567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804231224567
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804231224567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stef Adriaenssens & Giulia Garofalo Geymonat & Laura Oso, 2016. "Quality of Work in Prostitution and Sex Work. Introduction to the Special Section," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 121-132, November.
    2. Teela Sanders & Laura Connelly & Laura Jarvis King, 2016. "On Our Own Terms: The Working Conditions of Internet-Based Sex Workers in the UK," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 133-146, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Jarvis-King, 2024. "Trajectories of Vulnerability and Resistance Among Independent Indoor Sex Workers During Economic Decline," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 137-153, March.
    2. Cecilia Benoit & Michaela Smith & Mikael Jansson & Priscilla Healey & Douglas Magnuson, 2021. "The Relative Quality of Sex Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(2), pages 239-255, April.
    3. Treena Orchard & Katherine Salter & Mary Bunch & Cecilia Benoit, 2020. "Money, Agency, and Self-Care among Cisgender and Trans People in Sex Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Peter Backus & Thien Nguyen, 2021. "The Effect of the Sex Buyer Law on the Market for Sex, Sexual Health and Sexual Violence," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2106, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    5. Theresa Dyrvig Henriksen, 2021. "Do Prostitution and Social Vulnerability Go Hand in Hand? Examining the Association Between Social Background and Prostitution Using Register Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 525-543, September.
    6. Simplice A. Asongu & Usman M. Usman, 2020. "The Covid-19 pandemic: theoretical and practical perspectives on children, women and sex trafficking," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 20/082, African Governance and Development Institute..
    7. Lilith Brouwers & Tess Herrmann, 2020. "“We Have Advised Sex Workers to Simply Choose Other Options”—The Response of Adult Service Websites to COVID-19," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Sunny Jiao & Vicky Bungay & Emily Jenkins, 2021. "Information and Communication Technologies in Commercial Sex Work: A Double-Edged Sword for Occupational Health and Safety," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Anita Ghimire & Fiona Samuels & Sarmila Mainali, 2021. "Changing Patterns of Commercial Sex Work Amongst Adolescent Girls in Nepal: The Role of Technology," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(5), pages 1390-1408, October.
    10. Simplice A. Asongu & Usman M. Usman & Xuan V. Vo, 2020. "The Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19): Theoretical and practical perspectives on children, women and sex trafficking," Research Africa Network Working Papers 20/039, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    11. Samantha Majic & Melissa Ditmore & Jun Li, 2024. "440 Sex Workers Cannot Be Wrong: Engaging and Negotiating Online Platform Power," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Cecilia Benoit, 2021. "Editorial: Understanding Exploitation in Consensual Sex Work to Inform Occupational Health & Safety Regulation: Current Issues and Policy Implications," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-9, June.
    13. Helen M. Rand & Hanne M. Stegeman, 2023. "Navigating and resisting platform affordances: Online sex work as digital labor," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2102-2118, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:29:y:2024:i:4:p:1054-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.