IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v27y2022i1p27-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reclaiming the Second Phase of Life? Intersectionality, Empowerment and Respectability in Midlife Romance

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Milton

    (King’s College London, UK)

  • Kaveri Qureshi

    (University of Edinburgh, UK)

Abstract

bell hooks has written approvingly of the ‘second phase’ of life as a time, in midlife after divorce and relationship breakdown, when women may move from a place of dependency and intimate inequalities towards stridently asserting their needs and desires. This article interrogates these claims about the ‘second phase’ of life through qualitative empirical study. The article builds on our earlier work critiquing narratives of reclaimed control and self-development in the so-called baby-boom generation, showing how the compounded forces of ageism, sexism, classism, and racism are ever-present in mid- and later life romance. We juxtapose two separate ethnographic studies of middle-aged women’s post-divorce moves towards repartnering, one with middle-class White British women and one with working-class British South Asian women, to break open questions of empowerment in mid-and later life. Narratives and practices of self-discovery and renewed independence were common in both our studies, but the motivations for and consequences of these moves were differentiated by intersecting power relations. Narratives of newfound independence did not translate evenly into intimate lives and dating practices, where respectability remained vital and obdurate. Friendship groups diffused sexual agency and worked to maintain traditional practices of femininity. At this juncture of life many types of complicated and often contradictory femininities were played out, and were refracted through differing generational, diasporic and kin moralities. Empowerment in midlife can be ambivalent, laced with continued vulnerabilites and is implicated in a range of intersectionalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Milton & Kaveri Qureshi, 2022. "Reclaiming the Second Phase of Life? Intersectionality, Empowerment and Respectability in Midlife Romance," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 27-42, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:27:y:2022:i:1:p:27-42
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420974690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420974690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420974690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynn Jamieson & David Morgan & Graham Crow & Graham Allan, 2006. "Friends, Neighbours and Distant Partners: Extending or Decentring Family Relationships?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 39-47, September.
    2. Simon Duncan, 2011. "Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 129-140, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shruti Chaudhry, 2022. "Mid- and Later Life Cross-Sex Friendships in Minority Ethnic Contexts: Insights From Scotland," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(4), pages 947-963, December.
    2. Krystal Wilkinson & Jennifer Tomlinson & Jean Gardiner, 2017. "Exploring the work–life challenges and dilemmas faced by managers and professionals who live alone," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 640-656, August.
    3. Paola Rebughini, 2011. "Friendship Dynamics between Emotions and Trials," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 119-127, February.
    4. Jane Ribbens McCarthy & Val Gillies, 2018. "Troubling Children’s Families: Who Is Troubled and Why? Approaches to Inter-Cultural Dialogue," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(1), pages 219-244, March.
    5. Ann Berrington & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Paulina Trevena, 2015. "Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(12), pages 327-362.
    6. Lynn Jamieson, 2011. "Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 151-163, December.
    7. Val Gillies, 2011. "From Function to Competence: Engaging with the New Politics of Family," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 109-119, December.
    8. Jacqui Gabb, 2011. "Family Lives and Relational Living: Taking Account of Otherness," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 141-150, December.
    9. Simon Duncan & Anne Lise Ellingsæter & Julia Carter, 2020. "Understanding Tradition: Marital Name Change in Britain and Norway," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(3), pages 438-455, September.
    10. Julia Carter, 2017. "Why Marry? The Role of Tradition in Women's Marital Aspirations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Mary Holmes & Silvana Greco, 2011. "Introduction: Friendship and Emotions," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 89-94, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:27:y:2022:i:1:p:27-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.