IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v22y2017i1p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Marry? The Role of Tradition in Women's Marital Aspirations

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Carter

Abstract

While the individualisation trend has given way to a relational, reflexive turn in the sociology of relationships, there continues to be a writing out of convention and tradition in understanding relationship processes (excepting Gilding 2010 ). This paper aims to write tradition back into discussions around relationships by drawing on the accounts of young women and the central role that tradition plays in their relationship narratives. The analysis focuses on: participants’ accounts of marital security reflecting the desire for permanence in an impermanent world; accounts of romance and fairy tales in contrast to pragmatic concerns; and participants’ use of bricolage in combining the desire for ‘invented’ traditions with an emphasis on personal choice and agency. This paper highlights the ambivalent nature of the young women's discourse around relationships, agency and tradition: ultimately, themes of individualisation are revealed in their restatement of tradition. This emerges in three distinct ways: the emphasis on marital security appears as a response to ‘risky’ relationships; participants aspire to the ‘traditional family’ in response to growing fluidity in family relationships; and romance is appealed to in order to counteract their often very pragmatic approach to the life course. Thus, while there are changes in the ways couples can and do live in their relationships, there remains continuity in the ways that tradition is used by participants to articulate relationship aspirations. Tradition becomes reaffirmed in a context of individualism and de-traditionalisation which reflects a pragmatic response to changing social norms and values.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Carter, 2017. "Why Marry? The Role of Tradition in Women's Marital Aspirations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:1:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.4125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.4125
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.4125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Duncan, 2011. "Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 129-140, December.
    2. Jane Lewis, 2001. "The End of Marriage?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1974.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ann Berrington & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Paulina Trevena, 2015. "Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(12), pages 327-362.
    2. Jane Ribbens McCarthy & Val Gillies, 2018. "Troubling Children’s Families: Who Is Troubled and Why? Approaches to Inter-Cultural Dialogue," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(1), pages 219-244, March.
    3. Vogler, Carolyn & Brockmann, Michaela & Wiggins, Richard D., 2008. "Managing money in new heterosexual forms of intimate relationships," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 552-576, April.
    4. Elyakim Kislev, 2020. "Social Capital, Happiness, and the Unmarried: a Multilevel Analysis of 32 European Countries," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1475-1492, November.
    5. Simon Duncan, 2011. "Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 129-140, December.
    6. Sarah Milton & Kaveri Qureshi, 2022. "Reclaiming the Second Phase of Life? Intersectionality, Empowerment and Respectability in Midlife Romance," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 27-42, March.
    7. Jill Reynolds, 2006. "Patterns in the Telling: Single Women's Intimate Relationships with Men," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 98-110, September.
    8. Trude Lappegård & Turid Noack, 2015. "The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway - Findings from focus group research," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(9), pages 287-310.
    9. Arieke Rijken & Trudie Knijn, 2009. "Couples’ decisions on having a first child," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(26), pages 765-802.
    10. Peter Taylor‐Gooby & Jens O. Zinn, 2006. "Current Directions in Risk Research: New Developments in Psychology and Sociology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 397-411, April.
    11. Beccy Shipman & Carol Smart, 2007. "‘It's Made a Huge Difference’: Recognition, Rights and the Personal Significance of Civil Partnership," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(1), pages 129-139, January.
    12. Sasha Roseneil, 2006. "On Not Living with a Partner: Unpicking Coupledom and Cohabitation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 111-124, September.
    13. Del Bono, Emilia, 2004. "Pre-Marital Fertility and Labour Market Opportunities: Evidence from the 1970 British Cohort Study," IZA Discussion Papers 1320, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Simon Duncan & Anne Lise Ellingsæter & Julia Carter, 2020. "Understanding Tradition: Marital Name Change in Britain and Norway," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 25(3), pages 438-455, September.
    15. Susanne Elsas, 2013. "Pooling and Sharing Income within Households: A Satisfaction Approach," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 587, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    16. Stefan Buzar & Ray Hall & Philip E Ogden, 2007. "Beyond Gentrification: The Demographic Reurbanisation of Bologna," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 64-85, January.
    17. Kathleen E Kiernan, 2005. "Non-residential Fatherhood and Child Involvement: Evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study," CASE Papers 100, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    18. Graham Crow, 2005. "Towards a Sociology of Endings," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 159-168, November.
    19. Martina Klett-Davies, 2005. "The Diversity of State Benefit Dependent Lone Mothers: The Use of Type Categories as an Analytical Tool," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(1), pages 31-45, June.
    20. Yean-Ju Lee, 2022. "Lingering Male Breadwinner Norms as Predictors of Family Satisfaction and Marital Instability," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.