IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v26y2021i2p410-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interventional STS: A Framework for Developing Workable Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Kate Lyle

    (University of Southampton, UK)

Abstract

Technological innovation is often positioned as a solution to the challenges of healthcare provision, yet the experience of bringing new technologies into practice has proven uneven and unpredictable. To realise the potential benefits of innovation, we need to understand the complex relations between contingencies and contexts that seem to be ubiquitous as new technologies are brought into play in healthcare settings. This article explores what the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) can contribute to the understanding of implementation processes, arguing that combining Actor–Network Theory and Normalisation Process Theory provides a framework for prospective research. Drawing on examples from a prospective study of a new point-of-care test illustrates how the framework enabled an understanding of the processes likely to be involved in its implementation within three healthcare settings, with implications for the continued technical development. In combination, the theories enable different levels of analysis, but it is by keeping them in tension that this approach becomes practically applicable. If we are to rely on innovation to achieve improvements in healthcare provision, we need to find a way to intervene in the implementation process, and STS offer the resources to achieve this.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate Lyle, 2021. "Interventional STS: A Framework for Developing Workable Technologies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(2), pages 410-426, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:2:p:410-426
    DOI: 10.1177/1360780420915723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780420915723
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1360780420915723?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lehoux, P. & Sicotte, C. & Denis, J. -L. & Berg, M. & Lacroix, A., 2002. "The theory of use behind telemedicine: : how compatible with physicians' clinical routines?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 889-904, March.
    2. May, Carl & Ellis, Nicola T., 2001. "When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 989-1002, October.
    3. May, Carl & Gask, Linda & Atkinson, Theresa & Ellis, Nicola & Mair, Frances & Esmail, Aneez, 2001. "Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 1889-1901, June.
    4. Christina Prell, 2009. "Rethinking the Social Construction of Technology through ‘Following the Actors’: A Reappraisal of Technological Frames," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(2), pages 36-47, March.
    5. May, Carl, 2013. "Agency and implementation: Understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 26-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolini, Davide, 2006. "The work to make telemedicine work: A social and articulative view," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2754-2767, June.
    2. May, Carl & Finch, Tracy & Mair, Frances & Mort, Maggie, 2005. "Towards a wireless patient: Chronic illness, scarce care and technological innovation in the United Kingdom," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1485-1494, October.
    3. Hedgecoe, Adam, 2005. "'At the point at which you can do something about it, then it becomes more relevant': Informed consent in the pharmacogenetic clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1201-1210, September.
    4. Williams, Tracy & May, Carl & Mair, Frances & Mort, Maggie & Gask, Linda, 2003. "Normative models of health technology assessment and the social production of evidence about telehealth care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 39-54, April.
    5. Na-Kyoung Hwang & Sun-Hwa Shim & Hye-Won Cheon, 2022. "Use of Information and Communication Technology by South Korean Occupational Therapists Working in Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Macabasag, Romeo Luis A. & Mallari, Eunice U. & Pascual, Patrick Joshua C. & Fernandez-Marcelo, Portia Grace H., 2022. "Normalisation of electronic medical records in routine healthcare work amidst ongoing digitalisation of the Philippine health system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    7. Bee, Penny Elizabeth & Lovell, Karina & Lidbetter, Nicola & Easton, Katherine & Gask, Linda, 2010. "You can't get anything perfect: "User perspectives on the delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy by telephone"," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1308-1315, October.
    8. Cardullo, Paolo, 2017. "Gentrification in the mesh? Ethnography of Open Wireless Network - Deptford," OSF Preprints jm68s, Center for Open Science.
    9. Mark Jeffries & Richard N Keers & Denham L Phipps & Richard Williams & Benjamin Brown & Anthony J Avery & Niels Peek & Darren M Ashcroft, 2018. "Developing a learning health system: Insights from a qualitative process evaluation of a pharmacist-led electronic audit and feedback intervention to improve medication safety in primary care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Hawe, Penelope & Riley, Therese & Gartrell, Alexandra & Turner, Karen & Canales, Claudia & Omstead, Darlene, 2015. "Comparison communities in a cluster randomised trial innovate in response to ‘being controlled’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 102-110.
    11. Andreassen, Hege K. & Kjekshus, Lars Erik & Tjora, Aksel, 2015. "Survival of the project: A case study of ICT innovation in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 62-69.
    12. Janssen, M. & Stoopendaal, A.M.V. & Putters, K., 2015. "Situated novelty: Introducing a process perspective on the study of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1974-1984.
    13. Gibson, Mark & Neil Jenkings, K. & Wilson, Rob & Purves, Ian, 2006. "Verbal prescribing in general practice consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 1684-1698, September.
    14. Mauldin, Laura, 2019. "Don't look at it as a miracle cure: Contested notions of success and failure in family narratives of pediatric cochlear implantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 117-125.
    15. Andreassen, Hege K. & Dyb, Kari & May, Carl R. & Pope, Catherine J. & Warth, Line L., 2018. "Digitized patient–provider interaction: How does it matter? A qualitative meta-synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 36-44.
    16. Rhodes, Tim & Lancaster, Kari, 2019. "Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Joanna L Hudson & Peter Bower & Evangelos Kontopantelis & Penny Bee & Janine Archer & Rose Clarke & Andrew S Moriarty & David A Richards & Simon Gilbody & Karina Lovell & Chris Dickens & Linda Gask & , 2019. "Impact of telephone delivered case-management on the effectiveness of collaborative care for depression and anti-depressant use: A systematic review and meta-regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Davina Allen & Carl May, 2017. "Organizing Practice and Practicing Organization: An Outline of Translational Mobilization Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    19. Jelle van Gurp & Olaitan Soyannwo & Kehinde Odebunmi & Simpa Dania & Martine van Selm & Evert van Leeuwen & Kris Vissers & Jeroen Hasselaar, 2015. "Telemedicine’s Potential to Support Good Dying in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Looman, Willemijn & Struckmann, Verena & Köppen, Julia & Baltaxe, Erik & Czypionka, Thomas & Huic, Mirjana & Pitter, Janos & Ruths, Sabine & Stokes, Jonathan & Bal, Roland & Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen, 2021. "Drivers of successful implementation of integrated care for multi-morbidity: Mechanisms identified in 17 case studies from 8 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:26:y:2021:i:2:p:410-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.