IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v21y2016i4p30-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘I Can't Settle If It's Not Tidy; I Blame that on My Mum’: Exploring Women's Relational Household Work Narratives

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Kettle

Abstract

Household work literature has highlighted the importance of mothers to their daughters’ accounts of their household work practice, arguing that women can both aim to emulate and avoid particular practices in their own household work. This paper further explores this topic, drawing on a small-scale qualitative study to explore the self-narratives that two generations of mothers construct around the theme of household work. It looks particularly at how accounts of household work practices are incorporated into broader stories of growing up and taking responsibility, and the relevance of discourses of individualisation, and the notion of reflexive biographies to these explanations. This article also draws on theories of connectedness to show how self-narratives around the theme of household work reflect different forms of relationality, and to argue that a concept of relational selves is useful for making sense of these narratives.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Kettle, 2016. "‘I Can't Settle If It's Not Tidy; I Blame that on My Mum’: Exploring Women's Relational Household Work Narratives," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 30-43, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:30-43
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.4109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.4109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.4109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Meah & Matt Watson, 2011. "Saints and Slackers: Challenging Discourses about the Decline of Domestic Cooking," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 108-120, June.
    2. Mary Jane Kehily & Rachel Thomson, 2011. "Figuring Families: Generation, Situation and Narrative in Contemporary Mothering," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 164-173, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna-Maija Castrén & Kaisa Ketokivi, 2015. "Studying the Complex Dynamics of Family Relationships: A Figurational Approach," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 108-121, February.
    2. Mikko Jauho & Johanna Mäkelä & Mari Niva, 2016. "Demarcating Social Practices: The Case of Weight Management," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 10-22, May.
    3. Ben Kerrane & Katy Kerrane & Shona Bettany & David Rowe, 2024. "‘Othering’ the unprepared: Exploring the foodwork of Brexit‐prepping mothers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 494-512, March.
    4. Kirstie J. O’Neill & Adrian K. Clear & Adrian Friday & Mike Hazas, 2019. "‘Fractures’ in food practices: exploring transitions towards sustainable food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 225-239, June.
    5. Abigail Knight & Julia Brannen & Rebecca O'connell, 2015. "Using Narrative Sources from the Mass Observation Archive to Study Everyday Food and Families in Hard Times: Food Practices in England during 1950," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 29-72, February.
    6. Suzanne Rotheram & Jessie Cooper & Sara Ronzi & Benjamin Barr & Margaret Whitehead, 2020. "What is the qualitative evidence concerning the risks, diagnosis, management and consequences of gastrointestinal infections in the community in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta-ethnog," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:21:y:2016:i:4:p:30-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.