IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v20y2015i1p108-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying the Complex Dynamics of Family Relationships: A Figurational Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anna-Maija Castrén
  • Kaisa Ketokivi

Abstract

In this paper, we present a figurational approach to studying family relationships drawing from Norbert Elias's notion of figuration that combines insider and outsider perspectives to complex relational dynamics. In recent discussions on intimacy and personal lives, the family has been viewed as a subset of any personal relationships despite the structural dynamics of, for example, gender and generation that are at play within families. On the other hand, it has been claimed that a family has a special dynamic of its own that requires a ‘language of family’. In this paper, we present a figurational approach for studying family relationships both as personally lived and as embedded in wider webs of relationships. The proposed approach combines qualitative insight drawn from interviews and a systematic mapping of significant webs of relationships that both constrain and enable people. Combining these two aspects highlights the complex family dynamics and lived ambivalences between personal affinities and relational expectations. The paper draws from empirical studies in which significant life events, including marriage and biographical disruptions, such as loss, divorce and illness, reconfigure people's lives and selves, highlighting the contemporary complexity of families and personal relationships. The article develops relational methodology, addressing the ‘middle ground’ of relations to bring together the personal and the more structural aspects of family dynamics that phases of biographical change make visible.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna-Maija Castrén & Kaisa Ketokivi, 2015. "Studying the Complex Dynamics of Family Relationships: A Figurational Approach," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 108-121, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:108-121
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3539
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Val Gillies, 2011. "From Function to Competence: Engaging with the New Politics of Family," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 109-119, December.
    2. Julia Brannen, 2013. "Life Story Talk: Some Reflections on Narrative in Qualitative Interviews," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(2), pages 48-58, May.
    3. Jacqui Gabb & Elizabeth B. Silva, 2011. "Introduction to Critical Concepts: Families, Intimacies and Personal Relationships," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 104-108, December.
    4. Mary Jane Kehily & Rachel Thomson, 2011. "Figuring Families: Generation, Situation and Narrative in Contemporary Mothering," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 164-173, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kenneth Hemmerechts & Nohemi Jocabeth Echeverria Vicente & Dimokritos Kavadias, 2017. "The Order of Human Interdependencies: Simulating Elias’ One-level Multi-person Models," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 105-131, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgia Philip, 2013. "‘Extending the Analytical Lens’[1]: A Consideration of the Concepts of ‘Care’ and ‘Intimacy’ in Relation to Fathering after Separation or Divorce," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 18(1), pages 97-107, February.
    2. Jane Ribbens McCarthy & Val Gilles & Carol-Ann Hooper, 2018. "Introduction," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(1), pages 153-159, March.
    3. Charlotte Faircloth, 2015. "Negotiating Intimacy, Equality and Sexuality in the Transition to Parenthood," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 144-155, November.
    4. Sara EldéN & Terese Anving, 2016. "New Ways of Doing the ‘Good’ and Gender Equal Family: Parents Employing Nannies and Au Pairs in Sweden," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 44-56, November.
    5. Mary Jane Kehily & Rachel Thomson, 2011. "Figuring Families: Generation, Situation and Narrative in Contemporary Mothering," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 164-173, December.
    6. Sarah Marie Hall & Clare Holdsworth, 2016. "Family Practices, Holiday and the Everyday," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 284-302, April.
    7. Kirsty Morrin, 2018. "Tensions in Teaching Character: How the ‘Entrepreneurial Character’ is Reproduced, ‘Refused’, and Negotiated in an English Academy School," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 23(2), pages 459-476, June.
    8. Ash Watson & Deborah Lupton, 2022. "What Happens Next? Using the Story Completion Method to Surface the Affects and Materialities of Digital Privacy Dilemmas," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(3), pages 690-706, September.
    9. Jennifer Kettle, 2016. "‘I Can't Settle If It's Not Tidy; I Blame that on My Mum’: Exploring Women's Relational Household Work Narratives," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 30-43, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:108-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.