IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v19y2014i1p56-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quota Sampling as an Alternative to Probability Sampling? An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Keming Yang
  • Ahmad Banamah

Abstract

In spite of the establishment of probability sampling methods since the 1930s, non-probability sampling methods have remained popular among many commercial and polling agents, and they have also survived the embarrassment from a few incorrect predictions in American presidential elections. The increase of costs and the decline of response rates for administering probability samples have led some survey researchers to search for a non-probability sampling method as an alternative to probability sampling. In this study we aim to test whether results from a quota sample, believed to be the non-probability sampling method that is the closest in representativeness to probability sampling, are statistically equivalent to those from a probability sample. Further, we pay special attention to the effects of the following two factors for understanding the difference between the two sampling methods: the survey's topic and the response rate. An experimental survey on social capital was conducted in a student society in Northeast England. The results suggest that the survey topic influences who responded and that the response rate was associated with the sample means as well. For these reasons, we do not think quota sampling should be taken as an acceptable alternative to probability sampling.

Suggested Citation

  • Keming Yang & Ahmad Banamah, 2014. "Quota Sampling as an Alternative to Probability Sampling? An Experimental Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 56-66, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:1:p:56-66
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3199
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darryl Jeethesh D’souza & Harisha G. Joshi, 2020. "Exploring the Consumers Willingness of Using E-Commerce to Purchase Geographical Indication Based Crops, a Case Study of Udupi Jasmine," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(2), June.
    2. Hyemin Jung & Min-Woo Jo & Hyun Joo Kim & Won Mo Jang & Sang Jun Eun & Jin Yong Lee, 2019. "General Public’s Perspectives on Medical Doctors and Local Clinics in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-9, June.
    3. Huh, Sung-Yoon & Jo, Manseok & Shin, Jungwoo & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2019. "Impact of rebate program for energy-efficient household appliances on consumer purchasing decisions: The case of electric rice cookers in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1394-1403.
    4. Ágnes Vajda & László Ózsvári & Dávid Szakos & Gyula Kasza, 2021. "Estimation of the Impact of Foodborne Salmonellosis on Consumer Well-Being in Hungary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
    5. Adam Gemar, 2024. "Religion and Social Capital: Examining Social Networks and Religious Identification in the UK," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 23-40, March.
    6. Tianchang Ni & Runping Zhu & Richard Krever, 2023. "Responses to News Overload in a Non-Partisan Environment: News Avoidance in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    7. Sarah-Anne de Kremer & Tracy Ross & Marcus Paul Enoch & Fredrik Monsuur, 2024. "Factors Affecting Propensity to Lift-Share for Children’s Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Barbara Groele & Dominika Głąbska & Krystyna Gutkowska & Dominika Guzek, 2018. "Mother’s Fruit Preferences and Consumption Support Similar Attitudes and Behaviors in Their Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Stephen X. Zhang & Hao Huang & Jizhen Li & Mayra Antonelli-Ponti & Scheila Farias de Paiva & José Aparecido da Silva, 2021. "Predictors of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Brazil during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.
    10. Bhagyashree, Katare & Yenerall, Jacqueline & Zhao, Shuoli & Wang, Xuejian, 2024. "Novel approaches to analyze consumer behavior and policies to promote healthy and sustainable consumption," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344348, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:19:y:2014:i:1:p:56-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.