IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i11p2030-d238030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General Public’s Perspectives on Medical Doctors and Local Clinics in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Hyemin Jung

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Min-Woo Jo

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hyun Joo Kim

    (Department of Nursing Science, Shinsung University, Dangjin 31801, Korea)

  • Won Mo Jang

    (Health Review and Assessment Committee, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju 26465, Korea)

  • Sang Jun Eun

    (Department of Preventive Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon 35015, Korea
    These authors also contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jin Yong Lee

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
    Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government—Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul 07061, Korea
    These authors also contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

As patients in South Korea play the main role in choosing healthcare providers, understanding their attitudes and beliefs toward medical institutions is essential. This study evaluated the public’s perspectives on doctors and local clinics. A face-to-face interview survey was conducted with 1000 participants who represent the South Korean adult population. The questionnaire consisted of four domains: personal information; trust level for nine professionals, including doctors; healthcare utilization behavior and attitudes regarding local clinics; and assessment of local clinics. The trust level of the doctor was highest (3.16 out of 4) among nine professionals. 85.3% of the participants frequently visited local clinics because of accessibility. The main reason for visiting hospitals over local clinics was the belief that doctors employed at hospitals would be better qualified. People were generally satisfied with the service of local clinics but wanted more facilities and equipment. Among six attributes of primary care, “first contact” and “accessibility” got higher scores in importance and current performance. Lastly, the participants suggested that improving the quality of doctors was most important for the reinforcement of primary care. Efforts to consider public opinion should be made before establishing healthcare policies for primary care.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyemin Jung & Min-Woo Jo & Hyun Joo Kim & Won Mo Jang & Sang Jun Eun & Jin Yong Lee, 2019. "General Public’s Perspectives on Medical Doctors and Local Clinics in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-9, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:2030-:d:238030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/2030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/11/2030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnus M. Kim & Seongcheol Cho & Hyun Joo Kim & Hyemin Jung & Min-Woo Jo & Jin Yong Lee & Sang Jun Eun, 2018. "Primary Care Patients’ Preference for Hospitals over Clinics in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Keming Yang & Ahmad Banamah, 2014. "Quota Sampling as an Alternative to Probability Sampling? An Experimental Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(1), pages 56-66, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanchen Liu & Yingchun Chen & Xueyan Cheng & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Performance and Sociodemographic Determinants of Excess Outpatient Demand of Rural Residents in China: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Tianchang Ni & Runping Zhu & Richard Krever, 2023. "Responses to News Overload in a Non-Partisan Environment: News Avoidance in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    3. Agnus M. Kim & Seongcheol Cho & Hyun Joo Kim & Min-Woo Jo & Sang Jun Eun & Jin Yong Lee, 2018. "Rethinking the Role of the Public Health Clinic: Comparison of Outpatient Utilization in the Public Health Clinics and Private Clinics in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, June.
    4. A Jeong Kim & Hayeon Lee & Eun-Jeong Shin & Eun-Jung Cho & Yoon Sook Cho & Hajeong Lee & Ju-Yeun Lee, 2021. "Pharmacist-Led Collaborative Medication Management for the Elderly with Chronic Kidney Disease and Polypharmacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-8, April.
    5. Huh, Sung-Yoon & Jo, Manseok & Shin, Jungwoo & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2019. "Impact of rebate program for energy-efficient household appliances on consumer purchasing decisions: The case of electric rice cookers in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1394-1403.
    6. Stephen X. Zhang & Hao Huang & Jizhen Li & Mayra Antonelli-Ponti & Scheila Farias de Paiva & José Aparecido da Silva, 2021. "Predictors of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Brazil during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.
    7. Bhagyashree, Katare & Yenerall, Jacqueline & Zhao, Shuoli & Wang, Xuejian, 2024. "Novel approaches to analyze consumer behavior and policies to promote healthy and sustainable consumption," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344348, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
    8. Darryl Jeethesh D’souza & Harisha G. Joshi, 2020. "Exploring the Consumers Willingness of Using E-Commerce to Purchase Geographical Indication Based Crops, a Case Study of Udupi Jasmine," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(2), June.
    9. Agnus M. Kim & Sungchan Kang & Jong Heon Park & Yoon Kim, 2020. "Regional Variation of Hospitalization Rates for Asthma in Korea: Association with Ambient Carbon Monoxide and Health Care Supply," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Ágnes Vajda & László Ózsvári & Dávid Szakos & Gyula Kasza, 2021. "Estimation of the Impact of Foodborne Salmonellosis on Consumer Well-Being in Hungary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-10, September.
    11. Sarah-Anne de Kremer & Tracy Ross & Marcus Paul Enoch & Fredrik Monsuur, 2024. "Factors Affecting Propensity to Lift-Share for Children’s Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Hanbit Lee & Eun Kyoung Choi & Kyung A. Min & Eunjeong Bae & Hooyun Lee & Jongsoo Lee, 2022. "Physician-Customized Strategies for Reducing Outpatient Waiting Time in South Korea Using Queueing Theory and Probabilistic Metamodels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Barbara Groele & Dominika Głąbska & Krystyna Gutkowska & Dominika Guzek, 2018. "Mother’s Fruit Preferences and Consumption Support Similar Attitudes and Behaviors in Their Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Yanbing Zeng & Yuanyuan Wan & Zhipeng Yuan & Ya Fang, 2021. "Healthcare-Seeking Behavior among Chinese Older Adults: Patterns and Predictive Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Adam Gemar, 2024. "Religion and Social Capital: Examining Social Networks and Religious Identification in the UK," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 23-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:11:p:2030-:d:238030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.