IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v17y2012i3p19-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘I Know Him So Well’: Contracting/tual ‘Insiderness’, and Maintaining Access and Rapport in a Philippine Fishing Community

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson Turgo

Abstract

‘Insider’ researchers are generally conceived to have an epistemic privilege in the field over ‘outsider’ researchers, especially around the issues of gaining access and building rapport with research participants. However, access and rapport once secured must be continuously maintained and this poses several methodological challenges to the researcher. This can be a particular problem if the people being researched have an intimate knowledge of the researcher's life. This intimate knowledge can affect the maintenance of access and rapport with research participants, particularly in a small community characterised by insecure economic prospects and whose members’ survival could be affected by the researcher's political experience. Based on an ethnographic study of a fishing community in the Philippines, this article is concerned with the various nuances of maintaining access and rapport in one's own community and its ever-evolving economic and political conditions, which then contribute to the shifting positionality of ‘insider’ researchers’ status in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson Turgo, 2012. "‘I Know Him So Well’: Contracting/tual ‘Insiderness’, and Maintaining Access and Rapport in a Philippine Fishing Community," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(3), pages 19-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:17:y:2012:i:3:p:19-31
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2660
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manos Savvakis & Manolis Tzanakis, 2004. "‘The Researcher, the Field and the Issue of Entry: Two Cases of Ethnographic Research concerning Asylums in Greece’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(2), pages 86-97, May.
    2. Laurila, Juha, 1997. "Promoting research access and informant rapport in corporate settings: Notes from research on a crisis company," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 407-418, December.
    3. John Roberts, 2001. "Dialogue, Positionality and the Legal Framing of Ethnographic Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 5(4), pages 37-50, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juliana Siwale, 2015. "Why Did I Not Prepare for This? The Politics of Negotiating Fieldwork Access, Identity, and Methodology in Researching Microfinance Institutions," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, May.
    2. Natalie Tyldesley-Marshall & Sheila Greenfield & Susan J. Neilson & Jenny Adamski & Sharon Beardsmore & Martin English & Andrew Peet, 2020. "Exploring the Role of ‘Shadowing’ as a Beneficial Preparatory Step for Sensitive Qualitative Research with Children and Young People with Serious Health Conditions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Savvakis Manos & Tzanakis Manolis & Alexias Giorgos, 2015. "Breast Cancer in Contemporary Greece: Economic Dimensions and Socio-Psychological Effects," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 5(3), pages 933-933.
    4. Angelo M. Solarino & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "Challenges and Best‐practice Recommendations for Designing and Conducting Interviews with Elite Informants," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 649-672, May.
    5. Nicola Illingworth, 2006. "Content, Context, Reflexivity and the Qualitative Research Encounter: Telling Stories in the Virtual Realm," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(1), pages 62-73, April.
    6. Adam Pattison Rathbone & Kimberly Jamie, 2016. "Transferring from Clinical Pharmacy Practice to Qualitative Research: Questioning Identity, Epistemology and Ethical Frameworks," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 1-9, May.
    7. Alexandra Ridgway & Kate Lowe, 2022. "Looking Within: A Call for Greater Reflexivity in Expatriate Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(4), pages 1077-1093, December.
    8. Ormeño-Pérez, Rodrigo & Oats, Lynne, 2024. "The making of problematic tax regulation: A Bourdieusian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:17:y:2012:i:3:p:19-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.