IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v65y2019i7-8p631-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group differences in social inclusion between young adults aged 18 to 25 with serious mental illness and same-aged peers from the general community

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Gardner
  • Sue Cotton
  • Brian O’Donoghue
  • Eóin Killackey
  • Peter Norton
  • Kate Filia

Abstract

Aims: Young adults with serious mental illness (SMI) are thought to be socially excluded. However, psychometric measures of social inclusion have not been employed to examine group differences relative to peers from the general community. The aim of this study was to employ such a measure to determine differences in social inclusion between young adults with SMI and peers from the general community. Methods: A cross-sectional hierarchical logistic regression was conducted to identify which dimensions and individual indicators from the Filia Social Inclusion Measure (F-SIM) discriminated between n  = 152 young adults aged 18–25 from the general community ( M  = 21.36, SD  = 2.16) and n  = 159 young adults aged 18–25 with SMI ( M  = 21.13, SD  = 2.21). Results: Group membership was accounted for by Interpersonal Connections (Nagelkerke R 2  = .32), Vocational & Financial Security (Nagelkerke R 2  = .32) and Healthy Independent Lifestyle (Nagelkerke R 2  = .08) dimensions of the F-SIM. Relative to young adults from the general community, those with SMI were five times less likely to feel they had friends who would call on them in a crisis, odds ratio (OR) = .19 (95%CI = .04, .53), p  = .04, almost five times more likely to live with their parents, OR = 4.79 (95%CI = 1.98,11.15), p  = .004, almost four times less likely to have worked/studied any time over the past 12 months, OR = .27 (95%CI = .11,.64), p  

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Gardner & Sue Cotton & Brian O’Donoghue & Eóin Killackey & Peter Norton & Kate Filia, 2019. "Group differences in social inclusion between young adults aged 18 to 25 with serious mental illness and same-aged peers from the general community," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(7-8), pages 631-642, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:65:y:2019:i:7-8:p:631-642
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764019868749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764019868749
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764019868749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reinie Cordier & Ben Milbourn & Robyn Martin & Angus Buchanan & Donna Chung & Renée Speyer, 2017. "A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-37, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Candogan ORLU, 2019. "Basic Income: is it Applicable to Modern States?," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(76), pages 213-237, June.
    2. Patrick O’Donnell & Lisa Moran & Stefan Geelen & Diarmuid O’Donovan & Maria van den Muijsenbergh & Khalifa Elmusharaf, 2021. "“There is people like us and there is people like them, and we are not like them.” Understating social exclusion – a qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Roy McConkey, 2021. "A National Survey of the Social and Emotional Differences Reported by Adults with Disability in Ireland Compared to the General Population," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-9, April.
    4. Ana Belén Cano-Hila, 2022. "Understanding Social Inclusion in Contemporary Society: Challenges, Reflections, Limitations, and Proposals," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-5.
    5. Adriana Burlea-Schiopoiu & Norina Popovici, 2024. "Social Inclusion: A Factor That Influences the Sustainable Entrepreneurial Behavior of Generation Z," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:65:y:2019:i:7-8:p:631-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.