IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v65y2019i2p114-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attempting to disentangle the relationship between impulsivity and longitudinal self-harm: Epidemiological analysis of UK household survey data

Author

Listed:
  • Angharad N de Cates
  • Gennaro Catone
  • Paul Bebbington
  • Matthew R Broome

Abstract

Background: Impulsivity may be an important risk factor in terms of future self-harm. However, the extent of this, whether it may relate to self-harm that is new in onset and/or repetition of self-harm, and the detail of any interaction with mood instability (MI) and childhood sexual abuse (CSA) requires detailed examination. Aims: We used the 2000 Adult Psychiatry Morbidity Survey and an 18-month follow-up data to test hypotheses relating to the role of impulsivity, CSA and MI in the inception and persistence of self-harm. Methods: We assessed associations of impulsivity with (1) suicidal self-harm (SSH) and (2) non-SSH (NSSH) at baseline and follow-up, controlling for confounders including MI. Finally, we tested whether impulsivity mediated the relationship between CSA and self-harm. Results: A total of 8,580 respondents were assessed at baseline and 2,406 at follow-up as planned. Impulsivity significantly predicted emergence of new NSSH at 18-month follow-up even after adjustment for MI and other confounders. Impulsivity did not significantly predict repetition of NSSH, or repetition or new inception of SSH, even before inclusion of MI in the model. However, the absolute numbers involved were small. Cross-sectionally, impulsivity was a stronger mediator of the link between CSA and SSH (13.1%) than that between CSA and NSSH (4.8%). Conclusion: Impulsivity may increase the risk of future development of NSSH independently of MI, which is clinically important for risk assessment. The involvement of impulsivity in the repetition of self-harm generally appears less certain. However, impulsivity may have a role in SSH in the context of previous CSA.

Suggested Citation

  • Angharad N de Cates & Gennaro Catone & Paul Bebbington & Matthew R Broome, 2019. "Attempting to disentangle the relationship between impulsivity and longitudinal self-harm: Epidemiological analysis of UK household survey data," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(2), pages 114-122, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:65:y:2019:i:2:p:114-122
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764019827986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764019827986
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764019827986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Konrath & Brian P Meier & Brad J Bushman, 2014. "Development and Validation of the Single Item Narcissism Scale (SINS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bassem Salhi, 2021. "RETRACTED: The Relationship between CEO Psychological Biases, Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Saad Hassan & Muhamamd Faisal Malik & Saqlain Raza & Mulyadi Suhardi & Wentri Merdiani, 2023. "Personality and Humbleness: The Role of the HEXACO Model of Personality in Development of Humble Leaders," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    3. Thomas Buser & Leonie Gerhards & Joël J. van der Weele, 2016. "Measuring Responsiveness to Feedback as a Personal Trait," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-043/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Paweł A. Atroszko & Bartosz Atroszko & Edyta Charzyńska, 2021. "Subpopulations of Addictive Behaviors in Different Sample Types and Their Relationships with Gender, Personality, and Well-Being: Latent Profile vs. Latent Class Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    5. Luka Koning & Marianne Junger & Joris Hoof, 2020. "Digital signatures: a tool to prevent and predict dishonesty?," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 19(2), pages 257-285, November.
    6. Wolf, Tobias & Jahn, Steffen & Hammerschmidt, Maik & Weiger, Welf H., 2021. "Competition versus cooperation: How technology-facilitated social interdependence initiates the self-improvement chain," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 472-491.
    7. Ouyang, Mingkun & Cai, Xiao & Yin, Yulong & Zeng, Pan & Chen, Ye & Wang, Xingchao & Xie, Xiaochun & Wang, Pengcheng, 2020. "Student-student relationship and adolescent problematic smartphone use: The mediating role of materialism and the moderating role of narcissism," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Antonín PavlÃ­Ä ek & Aneta BobeniÄ HintoÅ¡ová & FrantiÅ¡ek Sudzina, 2021. "Impact of Personality Traits and Demographic Factors on Risk Attitude," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    9. Antonín Pavlíček & František Sudzina, 2020. "Intergroup Comparison of Personalities in the Preferred Pricing of Public Transport in Rush Hours: Data Revisited," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-9, June.
    10. Dritjon Gruda & Dimitra Karanatsiou & Kanishka Mendhekar & Jennifer Golbeck & Athena Vakali, 2021. "I Alone Can Fix It: Examining interactions between narcissistic leaders and anxious followers on Twitter using a machine learning approach," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(11), pages 1323-1336, November.
    11. Babita Jha & Lokesh Vijayvargy & Srikant Gupta, 2022. "The Impact of Socio-Economic and Psychographic Factors on Financial Inclusion," International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics (IJABE), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Angelika Lepold & Norbert Tanzer & Anita Bregenzer & Paulino Jiménez, 2018. "The Efficient Measurement of Job Satisfaction: Facet-Items versus Facet Scales," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Thomas Buser & Leonie Gerhards & Joël Weele, 2018. "Responsiveness to feedback as a personal trait," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 165-192, April.
    14. Steven Litherland & Peter Miller & Nic Droste & Kathryn Graham, 2021. "Male Barroom Aggression among Members of the Australian Construction Industry: Associations with Heavy Episodic Drinking, Trait Variables and Masculinity Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:65:y:2019:i:2:p:114-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.