IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v55y2009i2p157-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Schizophrenia Research and the Concept of Patient-Centredness: an Analysis Over Two Decades

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Calton

    (Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK, tim.calton@btinternet.com)

  • Anna Cheetham

    (Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Duncan McMillan House, UK)

  • Karen D'Silva

    (Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Rampton High Secure Hospital, UK)

  • Cristine Glazebrook

    (Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK)

Abstract

Background: Patient-centred medicine improves psychological and physiological functioning in chronic illnesses. Aims: To determine to what extent the patient-centred ethos (as exemplified by research addressing subjective experiences) was incorporated into work presented at major international schizophrenia research forums between 1988 and 2004. Method: Whole population-based, retrospective cohort study using abstracts from the International Congress on Schizophrenia Research and the Biennial Winter Workshop on Schizophrenia ( n = 9,284). Comparative analysis using abstracts from the International Society for the Psychological Treatment of Schizophrenia ( n = 992). Patient-centredness was assessed by determining the number of abstracts that primarily addressed participants' subjective experiences. Results: Research was presented from 50 countries globally. European and North American countries produced 8,573 (92%) of the total. Biological research was the main theme of 6,960 (75%) of the abstracts, with psychosocial research constituting less than 5%. One hundred and eighty three (2%) abstracts from the two main conferences addressed subjective experiences, as did 333 (34%) from the comparative analysis. Conclusions: Between 1988 and 2004 research emanating from North American and European countries, together with biologically orientated research, were the most prevalent perspectives on schizophrenia. It appears that research into the subjective experiences of participants has not been as prevalent as more objective accounts of the disorder, suggesting that this research effort has not been patient-centred.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Calton & Anna Cheetham & Karen D'Silva & Cristine Glazebrook, 2009. "International Schizophrenia Research and the Concept of Patient-Centredness: an Analysis Over Two Decades," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(2), pages 157-169, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:2:p:157-169
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008093449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008093449
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008093449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rogers, Anne & Day, Jennifer C. & Williams, Brian & Randall, Fiona & Wood, Pamela & Healy, David & Bentall, Richard P., 1998. "The meaning and management of neuroleptic medication: a study of patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1313-1323, November.
    2. Hall, Judith A. & Dornan, Michael C., 1988. "Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: Description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 637-644, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corrigan, Patrick W. & Salzer, Mark S., 2003. "The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 109-121, May.
    2. de Ruyter, Ko & Wetzels, Martin, 1998. "On the complex nature of patient evaluations of general practice service," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 565-590, October.
    3. Dew, Kevin & Norris, Pauline & Gabe, Jonathan & Chamberlain, Kerry & Hodgetts, Darrin, 2015. "Moral discourses and pharmaceuticalised governance in households," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 272-279.
    4. Berry, Brandon & Apesoa-Varano, Ester Carolina, 2017. "Medication takeovers: Covert druggings and behavioral control in Alzheimer's," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 51-59.
    5. Prof. Dr. Klaus Bendel & Prof. Dr. Wenzel Matiaske & Prof. Dr. Florian Schramm, 2000. "'Kundenzufriedenheit' bei ambulanten Pflegedienstleistern. Bestandsaufnahme und Vorschläge für ein stresstheoretisch fundiertes Messinstrument," Report 003, Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung.
    6. Rajkumar Giridhari Singh, 2012. "Customers’ Satisfaction on the Hospitals Services: A Comparison," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 3(3), pages 37-43, September.
    7. Hekkert, Karin Dorieke & Cihangir, Sezgin & Kleefstra, Sophia Martine & van den Berg, Bernard & Kool, Rudolf Bertijn, 2009. "Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 68-75, July.
    8. Sun, Shiwei & Zhang, Jin & Zhu, Yiwei & Jiang, Mian & Chen, Shuhui, 2022. "Exploring users' willingness to disclose personal information in online healthcare communities: The role of satisfaction," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Flore, Jacinthe & Kokanović, Renata & Callard, Felicity & Broom, Alex & Duff, Cameron, 2019. "Unravelling subjectivity, embodied experience and (taking) psychotropic medication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 66-73.
    10. Ruth E Cooper & Éanna Hanratty & Nicola Morant & Joanna Moncrieff, 2019. "Mental health professionals’ views and experiences of antipsychotic reduction and discontinuation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Margrit Löbner & Janine Stein & Melanie Luppa & Alexander Konnopka & Hans Jörg Meisel & Lutz Günther & Jürgen Meixensberger & Katarina Stengler & Matthias C Angermeyer & Hans-Helmut König & Steffi G R, 2017. "Choosing the right rehabilitation setting after herniated disc surgery: Motives, motivations and expectations from the patients’ perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, Jennifer & Rosenthal, Lisa & Auerbach, Melissa V. & Kocis, Christina & Busso, Cheyanne & Lobel, Marci, 2017. "Patient-provider communication, maternal anxiety, and self-care in pregnancy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 133-140.
    13. Katarzyna Krot & Iga Rudawska, 2021. "How Public Trust in Health Care Can Shape Patient Overconsumption in Health Systems? The Missing Links," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Seale, Clive & Chaplin, Robert & Lelliott, Paul & Quirk, Alan, 2006. "Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: A qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2861-2873, June.
    15. Li, L. X. & Benton, W. C., 1996. "Performance measurement criteria in health care organizations: Review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 449-468, September.
    16. Seale, Clive & Chaplin, Robert & Lelliott, Paul & Quirk, Alan, 2007. "Antipsychotic medication, sedation and mental clouding: An observational study of psychiatric consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 698-711, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:55:y:2009:i:2:p:157-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.