IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sajbmc/v9y2020i1p54-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taming the Raging Bully! A Case Study Critically Exploring Anti-bullying Measures to Support Neurodiverse Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Damian Mellifont

Abstract

Disclosure of neurodiversity in the workplace can attract unfavourable attention. The aim of this case study is to critically investigate the collective potential of specialized and generic mental health promotion guides to help prevent or treat the bullying of neurodiverse employees. Applying qualitative thematic analysis to eight of these guides originating from Australia, Canada and England, this research offers three key messages that should be of interest to policymakers and practitioners working in the Asia-Pacific region and elsewhere. First, guides as reviewed by this study collectively support anti-bullying themes across dimensions of policy/procedures, education, legal, leadership and monitoring/support. Second, evidence sourced from scholarly and grey literature raise challenges that if overlooked might reduce the effectiveness of guide endorsed anti-bullying measures. Finally, this study raises the prospect that anti-bullying measures to assist mentally diverse staff might be more effective when potential synergies between these are recognized and encouraged.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian Mellifont, 2020. "Taming the Raging Bully! A Case Study Critically Exploring Anti-bullying Measures to Support Neurodiverse Employees," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 9(1), pages 54-67, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:54-67
    DOI: 10.1177/2277977919881406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277977919881406
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277977919881406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salin, Denise, 2008. "The prevention of workplace bullying as a question of human resource management: Measures adopted and underlying organizational factors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 221-231, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bettina West & Mary Foster & Avner Levin & Jocelyn Edmison & Daniela Robibero, 2014. "Cyberbullying at Work: In Search of Effective Guidance," Laws, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Annabelle M. Neall & Yiqiong Li & Michelle R. Tuckey, 2021. "Organizational Justice and Workplace Bullying: Lessons Learned from Externally Referred Complaints and Investigations," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Arpana Rai & Upasna A. Agarwal, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Exposure to Workplace Bullying," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(4), pages 1069-1087, August.
    4. Dischner, Simon, 2015. "Organizational structure, organizational form, and counterproductive work behavior: A competitive test of the bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic views," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 501-514.
    5. Kelly Rae & Annabelle M. Neall, 2022. "Human Resource Professionals’ Responses to Workplace Bullying," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Yiqiong Li & Michelle R. Tuckey & Annabelle M. Neall & Alice Rose & Lauren Wilson, 2023. "Changing the Underlying Conditions Relevant to Workplace Bullying through Organisational Redesign," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, February.
    7. Mariya Razzaghian & Usman Ghani, 2014. "Effect of Workplace Bullying on Turnover Intention of Faculty Members: A Case of Private Sector Universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 6(1), pages 40-51, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sajbmc:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:54-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.