IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i1p2158244019838925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Equity in Community Assessments: A Participatory Approach in Rural Virginia

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Gilson deValpine
  • Laura Hunt Trull

Abstract

A coalition of community members and human service professionals in the rural central Shenandoah Valley of Virginia has performed a community assessment every 5 years. Overreliance on quantitative surveys and hospital-based Community Health Needs Assessments resulted in earlier assessments failing to identify the needs of vulnerable populations. As the coalition approached the time for a new assessment, their priority was to develop a deeper understanding of community health needs and solutions. An extended co-learning process between coalition, community, and local academic representatives resulted in a plan to develop assessment methods and community health improvement resources suited to this goal. The coalition identified methods rooted in the social determinants of health and utilized a community-based participatory research approach to provide underserved residents the opportunity to contribute to health research and decision making and produce an assessment more reflective of their community. Resources including local interpretation and implications of the World Health Organization’s 10 Social Determinants of Health, a Healthy People 2020 community health services profile, and user-friendly access to community-based secondary data sets were developed for intervention planning. All information, resources, and implications were shared at meetings, in public announcements, and at a public forum. All data remain publicly available on the coalition’s website. Previously held beliefs regarding access to care and quality of life were substantiated through this process, enabling the coalition to better align itself with local political entities and to move forward immediately with community health improvement planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Gilson deValpine & Laura Hunt Trull, 2019. "Health Equity in Community Assessments: A Participatory Approach in Rural Virginia," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:2158244019838925
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019838925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019838925
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019838925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santilli, A. & Carroll-Scott, A. & Ickovics, J.R., 2016. "Applying community organizing principles to assess health needs in New Haven, Connecticut," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(5), pages 841-847.
    2. Frerichs, L. & Lich, K.H. & Dave, G. & Corbie-Smith, G., 2016. "Integrating systems science and community-based participatory research to achieve health equity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(2), pages 215-222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xue Zhang & Mildred E. Warner & Elaine Wethington, 2020. "Can Age-Friendly Planning Promote Equity in Community Health Across the Rural-Urban Divide in the US?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Daniel Chamberlain & Jessica Jacob & Sonia Wutzke, 2021. "A Systems Thinking Methodology for Studying Prevention Efforts in Communities," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 555-573, October.
    2. Daniel E. Ufua & Angie O. I. Adebayo, 2019. "Exploring the Potency of Rich Pictures in a Systemic Lean Intervention Process," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 615-627, December.
    3. Arielle R. Deutsch & Rebecca Lustfield & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2022. "Community‐based system dynamics modelling of stigmatized public health issues: Increasing diverse representation of individuals with personal experiences," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 734-749, July.
    4. Walsh, Mike & Kittler, Markus G. & Mahal, Dawn, 2018. "Towards a new paradigm of healthcare: Addressing challenges to professional identities through Community Operational Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1125-1133.
    5. Walsh, Mike & Kittler, Markus G. & Throp, Maria & Shaw, Fraser, 2019. "Designing a recovery-orientated system of care: A community operational research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 595-607.
    6. Frerichs, Leah & Young, Tiffany L. & Dave, Gaurav & Stith, Doris & Corbie-Smith, Giselle & Hassmiller Lich, Kristen, 2018. "Mind maps and network analysis to evaluate conceptualization of complex issues: A case example evaluating systems science workshops for childhood obesity prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 135-147.
    7. Courtney W. Mason & Pate Neumann, 2024. "The Impacts of Climate Change on Tourism Operators, Trail Experience and Land Use Management in British Columbia’s Backcountry," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Shanti Kadariya & Lauren Ball & David Chua & Henriette Ryding & Julie Hobby & Julie Marsh & Karly Bartrim & Lana Mitchell & Joy Parkinson, 2023. "Community Organising Frameworks, Models, and Processes to Improve Health: A Systematic Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:2158244019838925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.