IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v9y2019i1p2158244019828231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology-Facilitated Stalking and Unwanted Sexual Messages/Images in a College Campus Community: The Role of Negative Peer Support

Author

Listed:
  • Walter S. DeKeseredy
  • Martin D. Schwartz
  • Bridget Harris
  • Delanie Woodlock
  • James Nolan
  • Amanda Hall-Sanchez

Abstract

Researchers have accumulated much social scientific knowledge about the scope, distribution, causes, and outcomes of the physical and sexual abuse of female students in North American institutions of higher learning. However, surveys of technology-facilitated stalking and the dissemination of unwanted sexual messages/images in college campus communities are in short supply. The few that have been conducted do not identify key sociological risk factors associated with these two electronic forms of victimization. This paper, then, has two objectives: (1) to examine the influence of two types of negative peer support and (2) to determine if being the target of technology-facilitated stalking and receiving unwanted sexual messages/images are associated with female students’ intimate partner violence and sexual assault experiences. The results confirm that the two variants of negative peer support examined in this study are significant predictors of digital victimization and that such abuse is strongly associated with intimate partner violence and sexual assault.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter S. DeKeseredy & Martin D. Schwartz & Bridget Harris & Delanie Woodlock & James Nolan & Amanda Hall-Sanchez, 2019. "Technology-Facilitated Stalking and Unwanted Sexual Messages/Images in a College Campus Community: The Role of Negative Peer Support," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:2158244019828231
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019828231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019828231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019828231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, Kathleen A. & Nobles, Matt R. & Akers, Ronald L., 2011. "Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 39-47, January.
    2. Fox, Kathleen A. & Nobles, Matt R. & Akers, Ronald L., 2011. "Is stalking a learned phenomenon? An empirical test of social learning theory," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 39-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ángel Hernando-Gómez & Delia Montero-Fernández & Antonio Daniel García-Rojas & Francisco Javier Del Río Olvera, 2024. "Digital Violence in University Student Couples: England vs. Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Tandon, Anushree & Alzeiby, Ebtesam A. & Abohassan, Abeer Ahmed, 2021. "A systematic literature review on cyberstalking. An analysis of past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Jane Jiyoun & Holmes, Lisa, 2021. "Longitudinal trajectories of behavioral problems among children in out-of-home care: A systematic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:2158244019828231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.