IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v7y2017i3p2158244017723051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blended Learning Approach for Less Proficient Students

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Yusoff
  • Rohana Yusoff
  • Nur Hidayah Md Noh

Abstract

This article describes the implementation of blended learning in a higher education institution by focusing on the less proficient students. Malaysia’s Ministry of Higher Education has urged every university to introduce blended learning in their teaching and learning processes as a new approach. Nevertheless, there are less proficient students who are hesitant, less motivated, and face difficulty in associating learning with technological applications. Our main purpose is to show how blended learning can be designed to suit the less proficient students by first identifying their learning styles and then creating a motivating supportive learning system through the use of teaching technology applications. The sample size for this study is 64 business program students from four groups taking the course Introduction to Statistics in two consecutive semesters. These are students who had to repeat a few subjects including Introduction to Statistics as well as students who entered university with lower qualifications and had to undergo one semester of booster certification program. Final examination scores are used as a measure of students’ performance. Comparison using examination marks scored is shown using independent t test, mean effect size, and Box and Whiskers plot. Results showed noticeable difference in examination scores obtained by the different groups of students. As a conclusion, while blended learning approach bears many benefits, it has to be tailored to suit the different students’ cognitive levels as well as learning styles.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Yusoff & Rohana Yusoff & Nur Hidayah Md Noh, 2017. "Blended Learning Approach for Less Proficient Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017723051
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244017723051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244017723051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244017723051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Hu & Yi Peng & Xueliang Chen & Hangyan Yu, 2021. "Differentiating the learning styles of college students in different disciplines in a college English blended learning setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Aujla, Navneet & Frost, Helen & Guthrie, Bruce & Hanratty, Barbara & Kaner, Eileen & O'Donnell, Amy & Ogden, Margaret E. & Pain, Helen G. & Shenkin, Susan D. & Mercer, Stewart W., 2023. "A comparative overview of health and social care policy for older people in England and Scotland, United Kingdom (UK)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Muhammad Azeem Ashraf & Samson Maekele Tsegay & Yang Meijia, 2021. "Blended Learning for Diverse Classrooms: Qualitative Experimental Study With In-Service Teachers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:2158244017723051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.