IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v5y2015i2p2158244015590163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rising to the Challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoping Li
  • Mingyuan Zhang

Abstract

Writing is recognized as a vital skill in education and the workplace; students in the United States finishing K-12 schooling are expected to be competent writers. Yet, the Nation’s Report Card found that U.S. high school graduates coming into the workforce are particularly deficient in writing skills. Teachers serve as a crucial link in the move to improve literacy skills of K-12 students; however, teachers themselves are underprepared to be writers and writing teachers. Therefore, there is an urgent need to improve teachers’ writing skills and skills of teaching writing to improve K-12 students’ writing skills in the United States. This qualitative study examined the process-based writing project experienced by 22 practicing teachers through their reflective practices in a graduate capstone class. In particular, this study explored the challenges the teachers faced and the lessons they learned through the recursive phases of writing: planning, drafting, revising, editing, conferring, and publishing. The triangulation of the researchers’ field notes, teachers’ daily reflections, and informal interviews between the instructor and the teachers indicated that the challenges the teachers faced and the lesson they learned through the process-based writing project were phase specific. On the completion of the writing project, the participating teachers (a) developed a deep understanding of process-based writing; (b) learned new skills of planning, drafting, revising, editing, and sharing; and (c) were more confident as writers themselves and as writing teachers for their students.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoping Li & Mingyuan Zhang, 2015. "Rising to the Challenge," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015590163
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244015590163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015590163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244015590163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teng Iat Loi & Zhiyu Feng & Kristine M. Kuhn & Thomas M. Tripp, 2022. "When and How Underdog Expectations Promote Cheating Behavior: The Roles of Need Fulfillment and General Self-efficacy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 375-395, November.
    2. Yuechao Du & Zhongming Wang, 2021. "How Does Emotional Labor Influence Voice Behavior? The Roles of Work Engagement and Perceived Organizational Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Chung-Jen Wang & Kuan-Ju Tseng, 2019. "Effects of Selected Positive Resources on Hospitality Service Quality: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Gong, Taeshik & Park, JungKun & Hyun, Hyowon, 2020. "Customer response toward employees’ emotional labor in service industry settings," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Walsh, Gianfranco, 2019. "Service employees’ naturally felt emotions: Do they matter?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 78-85.
    6. Sunhee Kim & Jaesun Wang, 2018. "The Role of Job Demands–Resources (JDR) between Service Workers’ Emotional Labor and Burnout: New Directions for Labor Policy at Local Government," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-31, December.
    7. Lin, Katrina Jia & Ilies, Remus & Pluut, Helen & Pan, Su-Ying, 2017. "You are a helpful co-worker, but do you support your spouse? A resource-based work-family model of helping and support provision," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 45-58.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:2158244015590163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.