IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i4p2158244014564359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pair Tests in a High School Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Rachaniphorn Ngotngamwong

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out how high school students responded to pair tests: the collaboration of two students in taking a test together. The objectives of pair tests were intended to create excitement, a higher motivation to study, increase learning through discussion, and close collaboration during a test. The outcome of the study indicated that the majority of the students enjoyed pair tests, and there were increases in motivation, discussion, learning, and collaboration. The main downsides of pair tests were disagreements over answers and the laziness of some test takers as this behavior created negative impacts on their responsible partners. The overall picture of pair tests was positive, and it is recommended that they are administered not more than once a quarter.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachaniphorn Ngotngamwong, 2014. "Pair Tests in a High School Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:2158244014564359
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014564359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014564359
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014564359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Shahid FAROOQ & Jean-Claude REGNIER, 2011. "Role of Learning Styles in the Quality of Learning at Different Levels," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 28-45.
    2. Milind Dawande & Monica Johar & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2008. "A Comparison of Pair Versus Solo Programming Under Different Objectives: An Analytical Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 71-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shubham Gupta & Abhishek Roy & Subodha Kumar & Ram Mudambi, 2023. "When Worse Is Better: Strategic Choice of Vendors with Differentiated Capabilities in a Complex Cocreation Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2833-2851, May.
    2. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    3. Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Christoph T. Schmidt & Armin Heinzl, 2019. "How Pair Programming Influences Team Performance: The Role of Backup Behavior, Shared Mental Models, and Task Novelty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1145-1163, December.
    4. Foad Iravani & Sriram Dasu & Reza Ahmadi, 2012. "A Hierarchical Framework for Organizing a Software Development Process," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1310-1322, December.
    5. Rakesh R. Mallipeddi & Subodha Kumar & Chelliah Sriskandarajah & Yunxia Zhu, 2022. "A Framework for Analyzing Influencer Marketing in Social Networks: Selection and Scheduling of Influencers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 75-104, January.
    6. Yu, Wantao & Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan & Nath, Prithwiraj, 2017. "Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 160-169.
    7. Dong, Su & Johar, Monica S. & Kumar, Ram L., 2023. "An optimization approach for hybrid workflows in platform-enabled private service marketplaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 874-890.
    8. Ravi Sen & Joobin Choobineh & Subodha Kumar, 2020. "Determinants of Software Vulnerability Disclosure Timing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(11), pages 2532-2552, November.
    9. Fakhra Yasmin & Ahsan Akbar & Zhang Yan, 2016. "An Exploration of Learning Styles Preferences of Higher Education Students in Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(4), pages 49-59, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:2158244014564359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.