IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v310y2023i2p874-890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimization approach for hybrid workflows in platform-enabled private service marketplaces

Author

Listed:
  • Dong, Su
  • Johar, Monica S.
  • Kumar, Ram L.

Abstract

The future of work is likely to include private platform-enabled marketplaces which remain a new, fertile ground for research. This paper focuses on hybrid workflows which utilize the expertise of in-house (IH) and on-demand (OD) workers to perform complex knowledge intensive tasks under service constraints. Our primary contributions are in identifying and modeling an innovative application of OR in the new economy, proving its complexity and proposing a high-quality heuristic. We formulate a scenario-based mathematical programming model of a private talent marketplace for Knowledge Intensive Business Services (KIBS). This model considers uncertainty in task, worker, and OD marketplace characteristics. Problem complexity is illustrated. We develop a simplified queuing theory-based model of PKIBS to characterize the structure of the OD marketplace. Propositions from the queueing model inform IH workforce size, IH and OD workforce composition, and OD pricing decisions. A Tabu-based One Period Look Ahead heuristic based on propositions from the simplified queuing theory-based model is proposed. Heuristic performance is evaluated using a problem upper bound and MIP solution for small problems, and experiments based on a cyber security use case. Results illustrate the mix of OD and IH workforce and sophisticated hybrid workflows for different market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong, Su & Johar, Monica S. & Kumar, Ram L., 2023. "An optimization approach for hybrid workflows in platform-enabled private service marketplaces," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 874-890.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:310:y:2023:i:2:p:874-890
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.02.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221723001509
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.02.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clara Grillet & Claire Bertin & Jennifer T. Le & Adrien Comte, 2016. "Marine Ecosystem Services in Europe," Post-Print hal-02156131, HAL.
    2. Kuhn, Harold W., 2012. "A tale of three eras: The discovery and rediscovery of the Hungarian Method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 641-651.
    3. Shunzhong Liu, 2013. "Innovation Management in Knowledge Intensive Business Services in China," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-34676-7, January.
    4. Jyotishka Ray & Jayarajan Samuel & Syam Menon & Vijay Mookerjee, 2017. "The Design of Feature-Limited Demonstration Software: Choosing the Right Features to Include," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 9-30, January.
    5. Liang Ma, 2016. "Governing civil service pay in China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 373-375, April.
    6. Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2017. "On Buyer Selection of Service Providers in Online Outsourcing Platforms for IT Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 547-562, September.
    7. Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Eren B. Çil, 2012. "Large-Scale Service Marketplaces: The Role of the Moderating Firm," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(10), pages 1854-1872, October.
    8. Shunzhong Liu, 2013. "Innovative Characteristics of Knowledge Intensive Business Services," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Innovation Management in Knowledge Intensive Business Services in China, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 7-16, Springer.
    9. Yili Hong & Chong (Alex) Wang & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Evidence from Online Labor Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 49-69, March.
    10. Konstantin Kogan & Avraham Shtub, 1997. "DGAP - The Dynamic Generalized Assignment Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 69(0), pages 227-239, January.
    11. Milind Dawande & Monica Johar & Subodha Kumar & Vijay S. Mookerjee, 2008. "A Comparison of Pair Versus Solo Programming Under Different Objectives: An Analytical Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 71-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhipeng & Zhou, Xiaoyu & Huang, Shoujun, 2021. "Managing skill certification in online outsourcing platforms: A perspective of buyer-determined reverse auctions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    2. Yili Hong & Benjamin B.M. Shao, 2021. "On Factors that Moderate the Effect of Buyer‐Supplier Experience on E‐Procurement Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1034-1051, April.
    3. John J. Horton, 2019. "Buyer Uncertainty About Seller Capacity: Causes, Consequences, and a Partial Solution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3518-3540, August.
    4. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    5. Irfan Kanat & Yili Hong & T. S. Raghu, 2018. "Surviving in Global Online Labor Markets for IT Services: A Geo-Economic Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 893-909, December.
    6. Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Senthil Kumar, 2021. "When Does Dispute Resolution Substitute for a Reputation System? Empirical Evidence from a Service Procurement Platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1565-1582, June.
    7. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Bin Gu, 2017. "Home Bias in Global Employment," Working Papers 17-06, NET Institute.
    8. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Pei-Yu Chen & Benjamin B. M. Shao, 2022. "The Screening Role of Design Parameters for Service Procurement Auctions in Online Service Outsourcing Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1324-1343, December.
    9. Yili Hong & Jing Peng & Gordon Burtch & Ni Huang, 2021. "Just DM Me (Politely): Direct Messaging, Politeness, and Hiring Outcomes in Online Labor Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 786-800, September.
    10. Ni Huang & Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Paul A. Pavlou, 2020. "Unemployment and Worker Participation in the Gig Economy: Evidence from an Online Labor Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 431-448, June.
    11. Zhijuan Hong & Ruhai Wu & Yan Sun & Kunxiang Dong, 2020. "Buyer preferences for auction pricing rules in online outsourcing markets: fixed price vs. open price," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 163-179, March.
    12. Liu, Xiaoxiao & Ben Liu, Qianqian, 2024. "Superior medical resources or geographic proximity? The joint effects of regional medical resource disparity, geographic distance, and cultural differences on online medical consultation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    13. Shubham Gupta & Abhishek Roy & Subodha Kumar & Ram Mudambi, 2023. "When Worse Is Better: Strategic Choice of Vendors with Differentiated Capabilities in a Complex Cocreation Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2833-2851, May.
    14. Piazza, Mariangela & Mazzola, Erica & Perrone, Giovanni, 2022. "How can I signal my quality to emerge from the crowd? A study in the crowdsourcing context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    15. Yanan Liang & Cheng Zhang, 2024. "Digital transformation and total factor productivity of enterprises: evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Martello, Silvano & Pinto Paixão, José M., 2012. "A look at the past and present of optimization – An editorial," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 638-640.
    17. Jie Ren & Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2023. "Exploring Influential Factors in Hiring Freelancers in Online Labor Platforms: An Empirical Study," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    19. Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Christoph T. Schmidt & Armin Heinzl, 2019. "How Pair Programming Influences Team Performance: The Role of Backup Behavior, Shared Mental Models, and Task Novelty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1145-1163, December.
    20. Jyotishka Ray & Syam Menon & Vijay Mookerjee, 2020. "Bargaining over Data: When Does Making the Buyer More Informed Help?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:310:y:2023:i:2:p:874-890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.