IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241271145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time Evolution Analysis of Riders’ Preference Attention and Satisfaction on Real-Time Crowdsourcing Logistics Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Zhang
  • Dan Li
  • Shengren Liu

Abstract

This study examines the evolutionary trends in preference focus and satisfaction among real-time crowdsourced logistics platform riders (hereafter referred to as riders) in China since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing real-time comments from 5,652 riders and applying the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model to identify riders’ preferences and calculate their attention levels, combined with riders’ actual ratings to infer satisfaction levels (ranging from very dissatisfied to satisfied), this research for the first time explores the changing patterns of riders’ preferences and their attention and satisfaction trends in the pandemic context from a long-term dynamic perspective. The findings reveal that riders prioritize interaction quality; the range of fluctuation in average attention levels is large when high and small when low; attention to platform management, system utility, and rider relationships is on the rise, whereas interest in other preferences is declining; there is a significant correlation between rider attention and platform policies; and social media and related public opinion influence riders’ preferences. These insights are instrumental for the platform to adjust the policy direction duly and meet the core demands of riders according to the limited priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Zhang & Dan Li & Shengren Liu, 2024. "Time Evolution Analysis of Riders’ Preference Attention and Satisfaction on Real-Time Crowdsourcing Logistics Platform," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241271145
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241271145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241271145
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241271145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241271145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.