IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241267143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Structured Literature Review of Nurses’ Perceptions Concerning the Use of Chemical Restraints Amongst People with Dementia and the Perceived Barriers to Non-Pharmacological Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Jacobs
  • Li Wei
  • Susan Slatyer

Abstract

This article aims to critically analyse current literature that explores nurses’ perspectives concerning the use of chemical restraints amongst people with dementia—regarding behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)—to consolidate existing knowledge on this phenomenon and generate a foundation for further research. This literature review followed the 12-step approach by Kable et al. A total of 17 articles published between 2012 and 2022 were included following critical appraisal. A total of 2,806 participants, primarily consisting of nurses of various levels (44%) were included amongst the 17 included articles. Five themes emerged from the analysis of the findings: (a) nurses’ perceptions of BPSD, (b) perceived effectiveness and safety of chemical restraints, (c) influence of the practice environment, (d) perceptions of non-pharmacological approaches (NPA)s, and (e) barriers to using NPAs. Explicit and implicit pressures to prescribe and utilize chemical restraints exerted by nurses and families promote the use of chemical restraints, amplified by barriers to using alternative approaches. A tentative conceptual model was proposed to explain these emergent concepts and relationships between the themes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Jacobs & Li Wei & Susan Slatyer, 2024. "A Structured Literature Review of Nurses’ Perceptions Concerning the Use of Chemical Restraints Amongst People with Dementia and the Perceived Barriers to Non-Pharmacological Approaches," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241267143
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241267143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241267143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241267143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241267143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.