IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241258228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Proportionality of Police Stop and Search in the Coronavirus Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Halford

Abstract

Multiple studies and reports have now concluded that the police in the United Kingdom (UK) disproportionately enforced coronavirus legislation against black and minority ethnic communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. This disproportionality was enforced through coronavirus fines which were introduced as part of coercive measures designed to restrict the movement of citizens. The use of coercive tactics by the police as a tool for maintaining order is not unheard of, and stopping and searching citizens is one method that is used to achieve this. This study therefore seeks to establish if the stop and search tactic was used proportionately by the police during the COVID-19 pandemic. To achieve this, we examine the application of the tactic in the UK, where data from stop and search records from all police services in England and Wales is publicly available. By using descriptive statistics, combined with modeling designed to detect anomalies, data from a 5 year period that includes the relevant periods of the UK pandemic is examined. Results identify significant rises in the use of the tactic during periods of lockdown, which when compared to white citizens, illustrates that the rises disproportionately affected Black, Asian, and young people aged 18 to 24. We discuss these findings against a backdrop of reduced recorded crime and wider traditional police demand, along with correlations in increased police activity related to the issuance of coronavirus fines. In conclusion, we suggest that both coronavirus legislation and stop and search may have been used together by the police as tactics to maintain order, specifically adherence to periods of coronavirus lockdowns.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Halford, 2024. "The Proportionality of Police Stop and Search in the Coronavirus Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241258228
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241258228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241258228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241258228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom R. Tyler & Jonathan Jackson & Avital Mentovich, 2015. "The Consequences of Being an Object of Suspicion: Potential Pitfalls of Proactive Police Contact," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 602-636, December.
    2. Lara Vomfell & Neil Stewart, 2021. "Officer bias, over-patrolling and ethnic disparities in stop and search," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 566-575, May.
    3. Emir Zunic & Kemal Korjenic & Kerim Hodzic & Dzenana Donko, 2020. "Application of Facebook's Prophet Algorithm for Successful Sales Forecasting Based on Real-world Data," Papers 2005.07575, arXiv.org.
    4. Aziz Z. Huq & Tom R. Tyler & Stephen J. Schulhofer, 2011. "Mechanisms for Eliciting Cooperation in Counterterrorism Policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 728-761, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantinos P. Fourkiotis & Athanasios Tsadiras, 2024. "Applying Machine Learning and Statistical Forecasting Methods for Enhancing Pharmaceutical Sales Predictions," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Christopher M. Sullivan & Zachary P. O’Keeffe, 2017. "Evidence that curtailing proactive policing can reduce major crime," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 730-737, October.
    3. Tiberiu Dragu, 2017. "On repression and its effectiveness," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 29(4), pages 599-622, October.
    4. Das, Aniruddha, 2022. "Childhood police encounters, social isolation and epigenetic age acceleration among older U.S. adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    5. Carriere Kevin R. & Encinosa William, 2017. "The Risks of Operational Militarization: Increased Conflict Against Militarized Police," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 23(3), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Andrea Silva & Diego Esparza, 2021. "Explaining the American crisis of policing: Media, malfeasance, and racial prejudice," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3103-3113, December.
    7. Yael Cohen‐Rimer, 2023. "Participation in welfare legislation—A poverty‐aware paradigm," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 83-102, January.
    8. Dando, Coral J. & Ormerod, Thomas C., 2020. "Aviation security by consent using the Controlled Cognitive Engagement (CCE) alternative screening programme," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Tom R. Tyler & Jeffrey Fagan & Amanda Geller, 2014. "Street Stops and Police Legitimacy: Teachable Moments in Young Urban Men's Legal Socialization," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 751-785, December.
    10. Vanhee, Alexander J., 2024. "Racial/ethnic disparities in police recovery of stolen property: A previously unexplored facet of police/victim interaction," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Avital Mentovich & Guy Ben‐Porat & Natalie Levy & Phillip A. Goff & Tom Tyler, 2020. "Policing alienated minorities in divided cities," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 531-550, July.
    12. Elizabeth Jordie Davies & Jenn M. Jackson & Shea Streeter, 2021. "Bringing abolition in: Addressing carceral logics in social science research," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3095-3102, December.
    13. Baćak, Valerio & Apel, Robert, 2020. "The thin blue line of health: Police contact and wellbeing in Europe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Victor Le Franc & Alexis Spire, 2021. "How Does Voluntary Contact with the Police Produce Distrust? Evidence from the French Case," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Michelle Sydes & Lorelei Hine & Angela Higginson & James McEwan & Laura Dugan & Lorraine Mazerolle, 2023. "Criminal justice interventions for preventing radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241258228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.