IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241256562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Significance of EFL Students’ Perceptions and Preferences of Written Corrective Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Ushba Rasool
  • Jiancheng Qian
  • Muhammad Zammad Aslam

Abstract

Language instructors worldwide use various types and strategies for providing feedback on the learners’ written production. Written corrective feedback (WCF) plays a vital role in systematically learning second or other languages. Additionally, students’ perception of feedback and its delivery has a specific value. Therefore, the current study examined perceptions and preferences of the WCF of EFL students they received in high school back in their home countries. However, the data was collected when they were studying in China as international students. To achieve these objectives, the researchers utilized a self-administered questionnaire and collected data from 91 international students at Chinese University, China. The results showed that most students supported positive statements (in the first part of the questionnaire) regarding WCF perceptions. The most preferred types were direct and unfocused WCF. Also, in order to establish a statistical basis on whether there are differences among various nationalities in terms of their perception, One-way ANOVA was performed. The findings displayed that all nationalities have difference in positive perceptions, and same tendency toward negative perceptions about WCF and focused feedback. Overall, according to their answers, WCF helps them to know what to avoid and adapt to compose an effective writing piece.

Suggested Citation

  • Ushba Rasool & Jiancheng Qian & Muhammad Zammad Aslam, 2024. "Understanding the Significance of EFL Students’ Perceptions and Preferences of Written Corrective Feedback," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241256562
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241256562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241256562
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241256562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241256562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.