IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241241887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ICT, Supply Chain Digital Integration Capability, and Firm Financial Performance: The Antagonistic Effects of Perceived Government Support and Cognitive Constraints on Digital Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Zhao
  • Xiao-yan Liu

Abstract

While awareness among managers regarding the benefits of digital transformation in supply chain management has grown, many Chinese SMEs have not fully embraced this shift due to ineffective ICT investments, a lack of effective government support, and the presence of related cognitive challenges. Leveraging a sample of 302 SMEs in China, the study employs SEM techniques to validate the direct effect of ICTs on the digital integration capability, and the relationship between the digital integration capability and firm financial performance. Furthermore, the LMS technique is applied to investigate the moderating role of government support and cognitive constraints within these relationships. Result shows that: (1) ICTs positively affect firm’s supply chain digital integration capability; (2) firm’s supply chain digital integration capability positively affects firm financial performance; (3) perceived government support exhibits an antagonistic effect, hindering the promotion of supply chain digital integration capabilities through ICT infrastructures; (4) Certain cognitive constraints related to digital transformation act as negative moderators within the digital transformation process. Through the exploration of two previously overlooked factors, namely perceived government support and cognitive constraints related to digital transformation, our research contributes to a deepened understanding of dynamic capability theory, social cognitive theory, and organizational inertia theory. Our findings suggest that government policymakers must reassess the effectiveness and objectives of policies in the digital transformation journey. Furthermore, firms are urged to acknowledge and address the potential adverse effects of cognitive constraints within their organizations and among their supply chain partners. Emphasizing the importance of digital integration capability is also crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Zhao & Xiao-yan Liu, 2024. "ICT, Supply Chain Digital Integration Capability, and Firm Financial Performance: The Antagonistic Effects of Perceived Government Support and Cognitive Constraints on Digital Transformation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241241887
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241241887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241241887
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241241887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gibbs & Keith Tanner, 1997. "Information and Communication Technologies and Local Economic Development Policies: The British Case," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 765-774.
    2. Andreas Klein & Helfried Moosbrugger, 2000. "Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 457-474, December.
    3. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    4. Lin Xu & Maoliang Ling & Yujie Lu & Meng Shen, 2017. "Understanding Household Waste Separation Behaviour: Testing the Roles of Moral, Past Experience, and Perceived Policy Effectiveness within the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Xiaoyan Teng & Zhong Wu & Feng Yang, 2022. "Research on the Relationship between Digital Transformation and Performance of SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Swafford, Patricia M. & Ghosh, Soumen & Murthy, Nagesh, 2008. "Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 288-297, December.
    7. Feliciano-Cestero, María M. & Ameen, Nisreen & Kotabe, Masaaki & Paul, Justin & Signoret, Mario, 2023. "Is digital transformation threatened? A systematic literature review of the factors influencing firms’ digital transformation and internationalization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Kristine Petrovska, 2022. "Barriers to Sustainable Digital Transformation in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Nasiri, Mina & Ukko, Juhani & Saunila, Minna & Rantala, Tero, 2020. "Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    10. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    11. Sea-Jin Chang & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Lorraine Eden, 2010. "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 178-184, February.
    12. José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Nancy Liliana Ibarra Hernández & José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Julio Blanco Fernández, 2018. "Role of Information and Communication Technology in Green Supply Chain Implementation and Companies’ Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Yi-Ju Lo & Tung Hung, 2015. "Structure offshoring and returns on offshoring," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 443-479, June.
    3. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    4. Anders Pehrsson, 2019. "When are innovativeness and responsiveness effective in a foreign market?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 19-40, March.
    5. Liu, Yi & Liao, Yonghai & Li, Yuan, 2018. "Capability configuration, ambidexterity and performance: Evidence from service outsourcing sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 343-352.
    6. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    7. Sandra Starke & Iveta Ludviga, 2024. "Impeding Digital Transformation by Establishing a Continuous Process of Competence Reconfiguration: Developing a New Construct and Measurements for Sustained Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Busso, Donatella & Yahiaoui, Dorra, 2022. "Towards agility in international high-tech SMEs: Exploring key drivers and main outcomes of dynamic capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Qiao, Penghua & Chang, Ming & Zeng, Yuping, 2024. "The influence of digitalization on SMEs’ OFDI in emerging countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Han, Jeong Hugh & Wang, Yingli & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Reconceptualization of information technology flexibility for supply chain management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 196-215.
    11. Frank Mawuyome Kwame Gamadey & Hod Anygiba & Victor Abbey, 2022. "A revised model of exploratory learning and new product development speed in the savings and loans sector: a contingency analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(10), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Amar Raju G. & Souvik Roy & Santanu Mandal, 2018. "Determinants of Website Usability: Empirical Evidence from Tourism Sector in India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(6), pages 1640-1662, December.
    13. Tolstoy, Daniel & Nordman, Emilia Rovira & Vu, Uyen, 2022. "The indirect effect of online marketing capabilities on the international performance of e-commerce SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3).
    14. Cubillas-Para, Clara & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Vătămănescu, Elena-Mădălina, 2024. "Gliding from regenerative unlearning toward digital transformation via collaboration with customers and organisational agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Viktora-Jones, Magdalena & Parente, Ronaldo & Drori, Netanel & Zhao, Yue, 2024. "Firm performance drivers within a dynamic emerging market ecosystem," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    16. Changwei Pang & Qiong Wang, 2024. "How Digital Transformation Promotes Disruptive Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7788-7818, June.
    17. Osama Musa Ali Al-Darras & Cem Tanova, 2022. "From Big Data Analytics to Organizational Agility: What Is the Mechanism?," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    18. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Khalid, Saba & Bhatti, Khalid, 2015. "Entrepreneurial competence in managing partnerships and partnership knowledge exchange: Impact on performance differences in export expansion stages," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 598-608.
    20. Achi, Awele & Adeola, Ogechi & Achi, Francis Chukwuedo, 2022. "CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: Moderating role of perceived environmental volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 771-781.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241241887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.