IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i1p21582440241227350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Evaluation: An Assessment Tool for Fostering a Creative Environment at Kyrenia Waterfront

Author

Listed:
  • DoÄŸa ÃœzümcüoÄŸlu
  • Mukaddes Polay

Abstract

A vital goal of this article is to examine waterfront development and creative class roles. It also discusses the importance of critical evaluation for sustaining social inclusion on urban waterfronts. Testing took place on the Kyrenia waterfront upgrade for creative classes and other people to determine waterfronts’ physical, functional, social, and cultural suitability. To determine the preferences, needs, and satisfaction levels of urban waterfront users, a survey, along with structured observations, was conducted: cultural and creative places and activities, appropriate rules and regulations, motivated entrepreneurs, continuous fund opportunities, preserving the historical context, cultural heritage, and unique values, physical and functional sufficiency, social well-being, and adequate accessibility, as well as tolerance and open-mindedness. A survey was conducted (sample size = 250), and subsequent systematic observations were conducted to obtain the data. As the survey findings indicate, the Kyrenia Waterfront has physical, functional, cultural, and social barriers that challenge both creatives and prospective creatives, including students and employers. Physically, inadequate infrastructure and accessibility challenges were reported. Functionally, limited amenities and inefficient land use were identified. Culturally, a lack of preservation of historical elements was evident. Socially, a sense of exclusion and inadequate community spaces were noted. These obstacles result in reduced attractiveness, limited community engagement, and hindered economic potential for the Kyrenia Waterfront. While the severity may vary, similar issues likely extend across the city, suggesting a broader urban challenge rather than a unique problem specific to the Kyrenia Waterfront alone. Critical evaluation is an essential component of the design process. Critical evaluation should involve collaboration among design professionals, clients, users, communities, public officials, and relevant experts to ensure a holistic and practical design outcome. Comprehensive policies should address the results of such an evaluation. Hence, it should be considered when determining what is required to create a community inclusive of all creative class segments.

Suggested Citation

  • DoÄŸa ÃœzümcüoÄŸlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2024. "Critical Evaluation: An Assessment Tool for Fostering a Creative Environment at Kyrenia Waterfront," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241227350
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241227350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241227350
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241227350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jürgen Bruns-Berentelg & Luise Noring & Adam Grydehøj, 2022. "Developing urban growth and urban quality: Entrepreneurial governance and urban redevelopment projects in Copenhagen and Hamburg," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 161-177, January.
    2. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "The Assessment of Creative Waterfronts: A Case Study of the Kyrenia Waterfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Shu-Ning Zhang & Wen-Qi Ruan & Ting-Ting Yang, 2021. "National Identity Construction in Cultural and Creative Tourism: The Double Mediators of Implicit Cultural Memory and Explicit Cultural Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    4. Marichela Sepe, 2009. "Creative urban regeneration between innovation, identity and sustainability," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2/3/4), pages 144-159.
    5. Stella Kostopoulou, 2013. "On the Revitalized Waterfront: Creative Milieu for Creative Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "The Use of Visual Decision Support Tools in an Interactive Stakeholder Analysis—Old Ports as New Magnets for Creative Urban Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Andrew L. Jones, 2017. "Regenerating Urban Waterfronts—Creating Better Futures—From Commercial and Leisure Market Places to Cultural Quarters and Innovation Districts," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 333-344, May.
    8. Richards, Greg, 2020. "Designing creative places: The role of creative tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "The Assessment of Creative Waterfronts: A Case Study of the Kyrenia Waterfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Doğa Üzümcüoğlu & Mukaddes Polay, 2022. "Urban Waterfront Development, through the Lens of the Kyrenia Waterfront Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "Creative Buzz Districts In Smart Cities: Urban Retro-Fitting And Urban Forward-Fitting Plans," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 37-57, DECEMBER.
    4. Huichao Feng & Jieling Xiao, 2024. "(Re)shaping the Tourists’ Imagined Identity of Mosuo towards Sustainable Ethnic Tourism Development in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Yan Zhang & Jiekuan Zhang, 2023. "Revisiting Tourism Development and Economic Growth: A Framework for Configurational Analysis in Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Homero Rodríguez-Insuasti & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Otto Suárez-Rodríguez & Marcela Yonfá-Medranda & Katherine Parrales-Guerrero, 2022. "Creative Economy: A Worldwide Research in Business, Management and Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
    7. Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Dagmara Adamkiewicz & Bartłomiej Szewczyk & Olga Kania, 2022. "Decision-Making Support for Housing Projects in Post-Industrial Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Mafalda Gómez-Vega & Iván Boal & Pablo Alonso-Villa, 2024. "Does the accumulation of creative capital influence the competitiveness of the tourism sector in European regions?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(8), pages 1951-1972, December.
    9. Camelia Surugiu & Marius-Răzvan Surugiu & Cătălin Grădinaru, 2023. "Targeting Creativity Through Sentiment Analysis: A Survey on Bucharest City Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    10. Francesc Romagosa & Maria Abril-Sellarés & Kathleen Scherf, 2022. "Visitors and Residents in El Raval Neighborhood of Barcelona. New Opportunities for Creative Tourism?," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 1-7, March.
    11. Toby Roberts & Ian Williams & John Preston & Nick Clarke & Melinda Odum & Stefanie O'Gorman, 2021. "A Virtuous Circle? Increasing Local Benefits from Ports by Adopting Circular Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Jing Wu & Jingwen Li & Yue Ma, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Potential and Actual of Urban Waterfront Spaces in Wuhan Based on Social Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Koens, Ko & Smit, Bert & Melissen, Frans, 2021. "Designing destinations for good: Using design roadmapping to support pro-active destination development," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Chayapoj Lee-Anant & Therdchai Choibamroong & Boonnawat Srikhwan, 2023. "Enhancing the Competitiveness of the Show Business Industry for Cultural Export as a Means of Creative Economy Development and Tourism Promotion in the Future New Normal Era: The Case of Thailand," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Pere Mercadé-Melé & Fernando Almeida-García & Aitor Martinez-Garcia & Miquel Angel Coll-Ramis, 2023. "Hotel Rooftops as a Space for Consumption in Historic Centres: The Case Study of Palma (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Üzümcüoğlu Doğa & Polay Mukaddes, 2024. "User Perceptions on the Urban Waterfront Development in the Kyrenia Ancient Harbour, including the Creative Individuals," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 35-54.
    17. Manuel Serra & Nuno Antonio & Claudia Henriques & Carlos M. Afonso, 2021. "Promoting Sustainability through Regional Food and Wine Pairing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Ge Zhai & Maoxin Zhang & Tingting He & Peng Ren, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of High-Quality Development and Coordination in Cities Along the Lower Yellow River," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Burns, Justin & Jarratt, David, 2022. "Typography and tourism places: The case of the English seaside resort," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Diana-Cristina PINTEA & Alina BADULESCU, 2020. "The Cultural And Creative Tourism €“ Sustainable Opportunity For Economic Development," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 88-100, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241227350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.