IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231220128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

College Students’ Civic Engagement Efficacy and Their Implementing Effects in Selected STEM Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Dian-Fu Chang
  • Jhen-Yu You
  • Angel Chang

Abstract

Previous studies on civic engagement have been reviewed in their contextual factors, for example, factors in organizational, pedagogical, and psychological domains, while little research has confirmed the structural linkage of related latent variables in this topic. This study intends to investigate college students’ civic engagement efficacy that might affect the entire sustainability of society in their later careers. We assumed students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs in higher education, typically viewed as science-oriented education, might neglect students’ civic engagement. To detect the issue in the specific field, we designed that civic engagement and its implementation were based on students’ self-efficacy measurement. This study considered the time spent on related activities in STEM which might impact students’ involvement in civic activities. A total of 322 survey responses were analyzed, the reliability and construction of the survey instrument were verified, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to examine the causal relationships among observed and latent variables. The findings suggest the two dimensions of civic engagement in terms of civic engaging and implementing might impact students as active citizens and their involvement in local and global activities. While students’ time spent did make significant influence in this model. This study provides an example to detect a specific student’s issue in STEM programs. The findings can bridge the gap of knowledge in STEM education and civic engagement, and provide a practical approach to detect civic engagement efficacy and its impacts in higher education settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian-Fu Chang & Jhen-Yu You & Angel Chang, 2023. "College Students’ Civic Engagement Efficacy and Their Implementing Effects in Selected STEM Programs," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231220128
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231220128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231220128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231220128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolff, Edward N. & Baumol, William J. & Saini, Anne Noyes, 2014. "A comparative analysis of education costs and outcomes: The United States vs. other OECD countries," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iwona Kowalska, 2016. "Sources Of Financing Knowledge-Based Economy: The Case Of Formal, Non-Formal And Informal Education In Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(1), pages 75-90, March.
    2. Irina V. Zastrozhnikova & Nadiia V. Datsii & Nelya M. Filyanina & Petro S. Oleshko & Nataliia M. Shkvorchenko & Liliia A. Martynets, 2020. "Financial and Economic Support of the Organization of the Educational Process," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 299-309.
    3. Manabu Nose, 2017. "Estimation of drivers of public education expenditure: Baumol’s effect revisited," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(3), pages 512-535, June.
    4. Dragomirescu-Gaina, Catalin & Freitas, Maria, 2017. "The social and economic preferences of a tech-savvy generation," MPRA Paper 84232, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Abankina, I. & Abankina, T., 2020. "Equality of rights vs equality of opportunities in higher education," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 47(3), pages 205-214.
    6. Vanesa D’Elia & Gustavo Ferro, 2019. "Empirical Efficiency Measurement in Higher Education: An Overview," CEMA Working Papers: Serie Documentos de Trabajo. 708, Universidad del CEMA.
    7. Emilie Dargaud & Frédéric Jouneau-Sion, 2019. "The good MOOC and the universities," Working Papers 1905, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    8. Emilie Dargaud & Frédéric Jouneau-Sion, 2019. "The good MOOC and the universities," Working Papers halshs-01996582, HAL.
    9. Catalin Dragomirescu-Gaina, 2015. "An empirical inquiry into the determinants of public education spending in Europe," IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Abankina, I., 2019. "Financing of Education: Trend on Personalization," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 216-225.
    11. Wolff, Edward N., 2015. "Educational expenditures and student performance among OECD countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 37-57.
    12. Abankina, I. & Filatova, L. & Vynaryk, V., 2016. "State Policy of Higher Education Sector Financing under the Budgetary Constraints," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 111-143.
    13. Dian-Fu Chang & Wen-Ching Chou & Tien-Li Chen, 2022. "Comparing Gender Diversity in the Process of Higher-Education Expansion in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and the UK for SDG 5," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231220128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.