IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231209806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Attributes Should be Considered in Regulating the Internet of Things? Evidence From Conjoint Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ho Seoung Na
  • Junseok Hwang
  • Hongbum Kim

Abstract

With rapid development in the Internet infrastructure, new and innovative services using the Internet of Things (IoT) have emerged. Despite the wide range of topics regarding IoT services that have been discussed, regulatory concerns solely concentrate on personal information and privacy protection in academic research and legislation. In other words, a comprehensive regulatory framework for IoT services should be developed with potential consumers in mind; however, relevant studies are lacking. To bridge this research gap, this study estimates consumer preferences to build an appropriate regulation for IoT service deployment. The study uses conjoint analysis and a layered model to investigate the importance of attributes for IoT services as part of the consideration supporting IoT regulations. Based on the estimation results, all attributes of the IoT services are relevant to potential consumers, and as an example of IoT applications, the Big Data analysis application is more critical to consumers in terms of marginal willingness-to-pay and relative importance. Furthermore, a new type of vertical integration is appealing to potential customers. Policymakers can benefit from the development of various IoT policies, simultaneous pursuits of IoT application innovation and privacy concerns, and nondiscriminatory regulation principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho Seoung Na & Junseok Hwang & Hongbum Kim, 2023. "Which Attributes Should be Considered in Regulating the Internet of Things? Evidence From Conjoint Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231209806
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231209806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231209806
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231209806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aakanksha Tewari & Brij B. Gupta, 2020. "Secure Timestamp-Based Mutual Authentication Protocol for IoT Devices Using RFID Tags," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 16(3), pages 20-34, July.
    2. Daniel Boos & Hannes Guenter & Gudela Grote & Katharina Kinder, 2013. "Controllable accountabilities: the Internet of Things and its challenges for organisations," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 449-467.
    3. Mohamed Sarrab & Fatma Alshohoumi, 2021. "Assisted-Fog-Based Framework for IoT-Based Healthcare Data Preservation," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    5. Ihuoma Onungwa & Nnezi Olugu-Uduma & Dennis R. Shelden, 2021. "Cloud BIM Technology as a Means of Collaboration and Project Integration in Smart Cities," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    6. Lee, Daeho & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Sangwon, 2015. "Network management in the era of convergence: Focusing on application-based quality assessment of Internet access service," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 705-716.
    7. Daniela POPESCUL & Mircea GEORGESCU, 2013. "Internet Of Things – Some Ethical Issues," The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, vol. 13(2(18)), pages 210-216, June.
    8. Irina Brass & Jesse H. Sowell, 2021. "Adaptive governance for the Internet of Things: Coping with emerging security risks," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1092-1110, October.
    9. Lee, Misuk & Choi, Hyunhong & Koo, Yoonmo, 2017. "Inconvenience cost of waste disposal behavior in South Korea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 58-65.
    10. Woo, JongRoul & Shin, Jungwoo & Kim, Hongbum & Moon, HyungBin, 2022. "Which consumers are willing to pay for smart car healthcare services? A discrete choice experiment approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Lee, Jongsu & Kim, Yeonbae & Lee, Jeong-Dong & Park, Yuri, 2006. "Estimating the extent of potential competition in the Korean mobile telecommunications market: Switching costs and number portability," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 107-124, January.
    12. Sestino, Andrea & Prete, Maria Irene & Piper, Luigi & Guido, Gianluigi, 2020. "Internet of Things and Big Data as enablers for business digitalization strategies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Shin, Jungwoo & Woo, JongRoul & Huh, Sung-Yoon & Lee, Jongsu & Jeong, Gicheol, 2014. "Analyzing public preferences and increasing acceptability for the Renewable Portfolio Standard in Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 17-26.
    14. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    15. Besmir Sejdiu & Florije Ismaili & Lule Ahmedi, 2020. "Integration of Semantics Into Sensor Data for the IoT: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Green, Paul E & Srinivasan, V, 1978. "Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 5(2), pages 103-123, Se.
    17. Ho Seoung Na & Daeho Lee & Junseok Hwang & Changjun Lee, 2018. "Research on the mutual relations between ISP and ASP efficiency changes for the sustainable growth of the Internet industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(11), pages 1238-1253, March.
    18. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, Hyunhong & Shin, Jungwoo & Woo, JongRoul, 2018. "Effect of electricity generation mix on battery electric vehicle adoption and its environmental impact," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 13-24.
    2. Lee, Daeho & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Sangwon, 2015. "Network management in the era of convergence: Focusing on application-based quality assessment of Internet access service," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 705-716.
    3. Acharya, Bikram & Lee, Jongsu & Moon, HyungBin, 2022. "Preference heterogeneity of local government for implementing ICT infrastructure and services through public-private partnership mechanism," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Shin, Jungwoo & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2016. "Strategic management of over-the-top services: Focusing on Korean consumer adoption behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 329-337.
    5. Lim, Sesil & Huh, Sung-Yoon & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Jongsu & Lee, Yong-Gil, 2019. "Enhancing public acceptance of renewable heat obligation policies in South Korea: Consumer preferences and policy implications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1167-1177.
    6. Daeho Lee & Jungwoo Shin & Junseok Hwang, 2011. "Application-Based Quality Assessment of Internet Access Service," TEMEP Discussion Papers 201183, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Nov 2011.
    7. Kim, Doha & Song, Yeosol & Kim, Songyie & Lee, Sewang & Wu, Yanqin & Shin, Jungwoo & Lee, Daeho, 2023. "How should the results of artificial intelligence be explained to users? - Research on consumer preferences in user-centered explainable artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Soyeong Park & Solji Nam & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2020. "Preference Structure on the Design of Hydrogen Refueling Stations to Activate Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Kim, Hyunggeun & Park, Sangkyu & Lee, Jongsu, 2021. "Is renewable energy acceptable with power grid expansion? A quantitative study of South Korea's renewable energy acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Kim, Junghun & Seung, Hyunchan & Lee, Jongsu & Ahn, Joongha, 2020. "Asymmetric preference and loss aversion for electric vehicles: The reference-dependent choice model capturing different preference directions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    11. Woo, JongRoul & Moon, Sungho & Choi, Hyunhong, 2022. "Economic value and acceptability of advanced solar power systems for multi-unit residential buildings: The case of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    12. Fraser, Iain & Balcombe, Kelvin & Williams, Louis & McSorley, Eugene, 2021. "Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Lukasz Grzybowski & Pedro Pereira, 2011. "Subscription Choices and Switching Costs in Mobile Telephony," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(1), pages 23-42, January.
    14. Luisa Menapace & Gregory Colson & Carola Grebitus & Maria Facendola, 2011. "Consumers' preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(2), pages 193-212, June.
    15. Woojae Kim & Sungmin Ko & Myoungjin Oh & Ie-jung Choi & Jungwoo Shin, 2019. "Is an Incentive Policy for Energy Efficient Products Effective for Air Purifiers? The Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Bechler, Georg & Steinhardt, Claudius & Mackert, Jochen & Klein, Robert, 2021. "Product line optimization in the presence of preferences for compromise alternatives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 902-917.
    17. Jong-Wen Wann & Chia-Yung Kao & Yu-Chen Yang, 2018. "Consumer Preferences of Locally Grown Specialty Crop: The Case of Taiwan Coffee," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    18. Franke, Melanie & Nadler, Claudia, 2019. "Energy efficiency in the German residential housing market: Its influence on tenants and owners," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 879-890.
    19. Choi, Hyunhong & Shim, Dongnyok & Kim, Seung Wan, 2024. "Heterogeneous public preferences for undergrounding high-voltage power transmission lines: The case of Seoul metropolitan area in South Korea," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. HyungBin Moon & Hyunhong Choi & Jongsu Lee & Ki Soo Lee, 2017. "Attitudes in Korea toward Introducing Smart Policing Technologies: Differences between the General Public and Police Officers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231209806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.