IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221099513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role Expectations for Nurses and Neuroscientific and Neurotechnological Advancements: A Qualitative Study on the Perceptions of Nurses on Their Roles and Lifelong Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Rochelle Deloria
  • Gregor Wolbring

Abstract

Nurses can understand and evaluate the impact of neuroscientific and neurotechnological advancements (NNA) from multiple standpoints given their roles as patient liaisons, advocates for their profession and their clients, leaders, and educators as well as their interactions with NNA such including deep brain stimulation and neuroimaging. We conducted semi-structured interviews with Canadian nurses to understand their perspectives on their roles in and outside the workplace, their familiarity with NNA and their ethical, legal, and social implications, their participation in NNA governance discussions and how lifelong learning can be applied to empower their participations in NNA governance discussions. Participants felt that nurses had the potential to meaningfully involve themselves in NNA governance discussions if given a greater opportunity. Participants were not offered lifelong learning surrounding the ethical, legal, and social implications of NNA. It would be fruitful to facilitate and empower nurses as contributors to NNA governance and ethics discussions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rochelle Deloria & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Role Expectations for Nurses and Neuroscientific and Neurotechnological Advancements: A Qualitative Study on the Perceptions of Nurses on Their Roles and Lifelong Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099513
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221099513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221099513
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221099513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hermann Garden & David Winickoff, 2018. "Issues in neurotechnology governance," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/11, OECD Publishing.
    2. Michelle Cleary & Jan Horsfall & Maureen O’Hara‐Aarons & Debra Jackson & Glenn E Hunt, 2011. "The views of mental health nurses on continuing professional development," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3561-3566, December.
    3. Köppen, Julia & Maier, Claudia B. & Busse, Reinhard, 2018. "What are the motivating and hindering factors for health professionals to undertake new roles in hospitals? A study among physicians, nurses and managers looking at breast cancer and acute myocardial ," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1118-1125.
    4. Rochelle Deloria & Gregor Wolbring, 2019. "Neuro-Advancements and the Role of Nurses as Stated in Academic Literature and Canadian Newspapers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-32, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simerta Gill & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ Using Conventions, Declarations, and Goal Setting Documents: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-100, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kopasker, Daniel & Islam, M. Kamrul & Gibson, Jonathan & Lau, Yiu-Shing & Sutton, Matt & Askildsen, Jan Erik & Bond, Christine & Elliott, Robert, 2020. "Skill mix and patient outcomes: A multi-country analysis of heart disease and breast cancer patients," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1074-1082.
    2. Rose McMaster & Violeta Lopez & Michelle Cleary, 2018. "Lifelong learning and professional practice," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 1-3, March.
    3. Abey Jose & Guilherme L. Tortorella & Roberto Vassolo & Maneesh Kumar & Alejandro F. Mac Cawley, 2022. "Professional Competence and Its Effect on the Implementation of Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: Scoping Review and Future Research Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Simerta Gill & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ Using Conventions, Declarations, and Goal Setting Documents: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-100, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.