IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i23-24p3561-3566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The views of mental health nurses on continuing professional development

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle Cleary
  • Jan Horsfall
  • Maureen O’Hara‐Aarons
  • Debra Jackson
  • Glenn E Hunt

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To determine clinical mental health nurses’ views and preferences about continuing professional development. Background. Participation in continuing professional development is now expected for nurse and midwifery registration. However, it is unclear how clinically based mental health nurses view continuing professional development and its relevance to career intentions. Design. Qualitative. Method. Semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews with mental health nurses (n = 50) drawn from inpatient mental health units. Results. The most prominent factor identified through this research is that the majority of the fifty participants valued continuing professional development and sought more opportunities to participate. They particularly favoured in‐house locally based sessions targeting patient‐related clinical skills enhancement. Importantly, this interest in continuing professional development was not confined to new graduates needing to consolidate their skills. Work‐based flexibility, the types of courses available and opportunities for study leave were also identified as important factors. Of the 50 nurses interviewed, 40% expressed a desire for continuing professional development vis‐à‐vis remaining in the service; 30% of nurses responded to the same question with an emphasis on the importance of collegial support amongst peers and management; and 30% of the nurses indicated their primary focus for continuing professional development was to further their tertiary studies. Conclusions. These results are not only timely given the requirements around continuing professional development, but are also important to drive improvements in quality continuing professional development where needs are prioritised, discussed and agreed on. Relevance to clinical practice. Findings from this study highlight the value clinical nurses place on having access to work‐based and clinically focussed education and development. Relevant on‐the‐job professional education has the potential to improve job satisfaction and retention of clinical nurses, thus ultimately directly and positively influence patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle Cleary & Jan Horsfall & Maureen O’Hara‐Aarons & Debra Jackson & Glenn E Hunt, 2011. "The views of mental health nurses on continuing professional development," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3561-3566, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3561-3566
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03745.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03745.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03745.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rochelle Deloria & Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Role Expectations for Nurses and Neuroscientific and Neurotechnological Advancements: A Qualitative Study on the Perceptions of Nurses on Their Roles and Lifelong Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    2. Rose McMaster & Violeta Lopez & Michelle Cleary, 2018. "Lifelong learning and professional practice," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 1-3, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:23-24:p:3561-3566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.