IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221089485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Fear of Childbirth Among Urban Women in India: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Baby Sharma
  • Suresh Jungari
  • Ajinkya Lawange

Abstract

There is increasing evidence shows that fear of childbirth (FOC) may have short- and long-term adverse effects on mothers and babies if left untreated. The childbirth process is an experience with many dimensions, multifaceted, and unique for each woman, still strongly influenced by the social-cultural context in which women belongs. To identify and explore the factors contributing to the fear of childbirth among recently delivered women of Pune city, India. The study used a qualitative study approach. A total of 15 in-depth interviews were conducted with women who have recently given birth in maternity hospitals. Interviews were conducted using an interview guide (open ended-questionnaire). Interviews were audio-recorded. The participants were called into a separate room for the interview; full privacy was given to the interviewees, thus making a safe and reliable environment. All collected interviews were transcribed and analyzed. Axial coding was used to develop codes into major themes contributing to FOC were derived. Seven major themes emerged from the analysis of the transcribed interviews. The seven major themes are fear related to the child, fear of parenthood, fear due to mode of delivery, negative pregnancy/delivery experience, psychological aspects attributed to fear of pregnancy, fear of pain, and social background. FOC occurs in most of pregnant women irrespective of parity. The determinants of FOC are influenced by women context; thus, variation in factors of FOC is observed. The FOC related factors show the complex interconnection between them, and it may vary from woman to woman and settings to settings concerning women context.

Suggested Citation

  • Baby Sharma & Suresh Jungari & Ajinkya Lawange, 2022. "Factors Affecting Fear of Childbirth Among Urban Women in India: A Qualitative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221089485
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221089485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221089485
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221089485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Praveen Kumar Pathak & Abhishek Singh & S V Subramanian, 2010. "Economic Inequalities in Maternal Health Care: Prenatal Care and Skilled Birth Attendance in India, 1992–2006," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Rohini Pande & Nan Astone, 2007. "Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 26(1), pages 1-29, February.
    3. Aparna Mitra, 2014. "Son Preference in India: Implications for Gender Development," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 1021-1037, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leeson, Peter T. & Suarez, Paola A., 2017. "Child brides," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 40-61.
    2. Julia Behrman & Sara Duvisac, 2017. "The relationship between women's paid employment and women's stated son preference in India," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(52), pages 1601-1636.
    3. Bussolo,Maurizio & Ezebuihe,Jessy Amarachi & Munoz Boudet,Ana Maria & Poupakis,Stavros & Rahman,Tasmia & Sarma,Nayantara, 2022. "Social Norms and Gender Equality : A Descriptive Analysis for South Asia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10142, The World Bank.
    4. Paola A. Suarez, 2018. "Child-bride marriage and female welfare," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Bidisha Mandal & Wenjun Wu, 2023. "Examining the effects of a two-child policy in rural India," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Barman, Papai & Sahoo, Harihar, 2021. "Sex preference in India: Trends, patterns and determinants," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Silvia Helena Barcellos & Leandro S. Carvalho & Adriana Lleras-Muney, 2014. "Child Gender and Parental Investments in India: Are Boys and Girls Treated Differently?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(1), pages 157-189, January.
    8. Lídia Farré, 2013. "The Role of Men in the Economic and Social Development of Women: Implications for Gender Equality," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 22-51, February.
    9. Adriana D. Kugler & Santosh Kumar, 2017. "Preference for Boys, Family Size, and Educational Attainment in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(3), pages 835-859, June.
    10. Giyeon Seo & Tanya Koropeckyj‐Cox & Sanghag Kim, 2022. "Correlates of Contemporary Gender Preference for Children in South Korea," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(1), pages 161-188, March.
    11. Evan Borkum & Dana Rotz & Anu Rangarajan & Swetha Sridharan & Sukhmani Sethi & Mercy Manoranjini & Lakshmi Ramakrishnan & Lalit Dandona & Rakhi Dandona & Priyanka S. Kochar & G. Anil Kumar & Priyanka , "undated". "Midline Findings from the Evaluation of the Ananya Program in Bihar," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 74ef56ababd9412b82ef906fc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. Leena Mary Eapen, 2020. "Son Preference in India: Is it a Cultural Bequest?," Working papers 373, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    13. Scott South & Katherine Trent & Sunita Bose, 2014. "Skewed Sex Ratios and Criminal Victimization in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 1019-1040, June.
    14. Nahid Tavassoli, 2021. "The Gender-Biased Fertility Behavior: Evidence from Southeast Asian Countries," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 235-261, July.
    15. Nitya Rao, 2018. "Global Agendas, Local Norms: Mobilizing around Unpaid Care and Domestic Work in Asia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(3), pages 735-758, May.
    16. Augsburg, Britta & Rodríguez-Lesmes, Paul Andrés, 2018. "Sanitation and child health in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 22-39.
    17. Chen, Shu & Ying, Sammy Xiaoyan & Wu, Huiying & You, Jiaxing, 2021. "Carrying on the family's legacy: Male heirs and firm innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Diwakar Mohan & Jean Juste Harrisson Bashingwa & Nicki Tiffin & Diva Dhar & Nicola Mulder & Asha George & Amnesty E LeFevre, 2020. "Does having a mobile phone matter? Linking phone access among women to health in India: An exploratory analysis of the National Family Health Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Ravi Durga Prasad & Somya Arora & Pradeep S. Salve & Srinivas Goli & K. S. James & Saseendran Pallikadavath & Udaya S. Mishra & Irudaya S. Rajan, 2022. "Why there is underutilization of four and more antenatal care services despite the colossal rise in institutional deliveries in Bihar, India," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 24(2), pages 355-378, December.
    20. Goli, Srinivas & Arora, Somya & Jain, Neha & Shekher, T V, 2022. "Patrilocality and Child Sex Ratios in India," MPRA Paper 111905, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221089485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.