IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i4p21582440211054128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Bas Hooijmaaijers

Abstract

After Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC) started meeting in the BRIC countries format, and since 2011 with South Africa in the BRICS format, these countries’ leaders made several pledges for strengthening intra-BRICS economic cooperation. This article examines the degree this is reflected in the increase of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment (COFDI) in the other four BRICS countries, the value of Chinese construction contracts, and bilateral trade between China and Brazil, India, Russia South Africa in 2009 to 2019. Focusing on these aspects contributes to the ongoing debate about the institutionalization of the BRICS political grouping. This article demonstrates that, thus far, despite the various pledges, the intensification of intra-BRICS economic cooperation is very limited. With some exemptions due to mega investment deals, COFDI in the other BRICS partners is still reasonably modest and shows no clear trend of increase over time in both absolute and relative figures. There is no significant increase in total trade, and various imbalances and asymmetries remain. Thus, the reality does not mirror the BRICS rhetoric on the intensification of economic cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211054128
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211054128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211054128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211054128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Helleiner & Hongying Wang, 2018. "Limits to the BRICS’ challenge: credit rating reform and institutional innovation in global finance," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 573-595, September.
    2. Cooper, Andrew F., 2016. "The BRICS: A Very Short Introduction," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198723394.
    3. Deborah Bräutigam & Kevin P. Gallagher, 2014. "Bartering Globalization: China's Commodity-backed Finance in Africa and Latin America," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(3), pages 346-352, September.
    4. Stephan Keukeleire & Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2014. "The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 582-599, May.
    5. Sergio Gusmão Suchodolski & Julien Marcel Demeulemeester, 2018. "The BRICS Coming of Age and the New Development Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(4), pages 578-585, November.
    6. Ramesh Thakur, 2014. "How representative are ?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1791-1808, November.
    7. Fabiano Mielniczuk, 2013. "in the Contemporary World: changing identities, converging interests," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 1075-1090.
    8. Peter Ferdinand, 2014. "Rising powers at the UN: an analysis of the voting behaviour of in the General Assembly," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 376-391, March.
    9. Hongying Wang, 2017. "New Multilateral Development Banks: Opportunities and Challenges for Global Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 113-118, February.
    10. Andrew F. Cooper, 2017. "The BRICS’ New Development Bank: Shifting from Material Leverage to Innovative Capacity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 275-284, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hang Luo & Lize Yang, 2021. "Equality and Equity in Emerging Multilateral Financial Institutions: The Case of the BRICS Institutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 482-508, September.
    2. Gregory T. Chin, 2024. "Introduction – The evolution of New Development Bank (NDB): A decade plus in the making," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 368-382, May.
    3. Hang Luo & Lize Yang & Kourosh Houshmand, 2021. "Power Structure Dynamics in Growing Multilateral Development Banks: The Case of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 24-39, February.
    4. Salvatore Babones & John H.S. Åberg & Obert Hodzi, 2020. "China's Role in Global Development Finance: China Challenge or Business as Usual?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(3), pages 326-335, May.
    5. Carolijn van Noort, 2017. "Study of Strategic Narratives: The Case of BRICS," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 121-129.
    6. Andrew F. Cooper & Brendon J. Cannon, 2024. "The United Arab Emirates and the New Development Bank: Mutual interests and first‐mover advantages," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 398-404, May.
    7. Byungwon Woo, 2021. "Empirical categorization of middle powers and how different middle powers are treated in international organizations: The case of India and South Korea," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 149-165, June.
    8. Rodrigo Fracalossi de Moraes, 2020. "Whither Security Cooperation in the BRICS? Between the Protection of Norms and Domestic Politics Dynamics," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 439-447, September.
    9. Hongying Wang, 2019. "The New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: China's Ambiguous Approach to Global Financial Governance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(1), pages 221-244, January.
    10. Andrew F. Cooper, 2017. "The BRICS’ New Development Bank: Shifting from Material Leverage to Innovative Capacity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 275-284, September.
    11. Xu, Jiajun & Ru, Xinshun & Song, Pengcheng, 2021. "Can a new model of infrastructure financing mitigate credit rationing in poorly governed countries?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 111-120.
    12. Xia, Ying & Chen, Muyang, 2023. "The Janus face of stateness: China's development-oriented equity investments in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Sierra, Jazmin & Hochstetler, Kathryn, 2017. "Transnational activist networks and rising powers: transparency and environmental concerns in the Brazilian National Development Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 79089, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Schclarek, Alfredo & Xu, Jiajun & Amuchastegui, Pedro, 2022. "Panda bond financing of the Belt and Road Initiative: An analysis of monetary mechanisms and financial risks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Hameeda A. AlMalki & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2023. "Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 731-785, June.
    16. Horn, Sebastian & Reinhart, Carmen M. & Trebesch, Christoph, 2021. "China's overseas lending," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Bert Hofman & P. S. Srinivas, 2024. "New Development Bank's role in the global financial architecture," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 451-457, May.
    18. Miao Miao & Jiang Yushi & Dinkneh Gebre Borojo, 2020. "The Impacts of China–Africa Economic Relation on Factor Productivity of African Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, June.
    19. Francesco Petrone, 2021. "BRICS and Global Governance: Will the Grouping be able to Reform the United Nations Security Council?," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 363-379, July.
    20. Alvaro Mendez, 2024. "Latin American agency: The New Development Bank, Uruguay's accession and Brazilian influence," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 405-413, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:21582440211054128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.