IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v52y2014i3p582-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Keukeleire
  • Bas Hooijmaaijers

Abstract

Over the past decade the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and other emerging power alliances (such as BASIC [Brazil, South Africa, India and China] and IBSA [India, Brazil, South Africa]), as well as multilateral organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the global south, have become increasingly important players on the world stage. None of the variations on Asian regionalism and emerging power alliances is in itself very influential. Taken together, however, they are not inconsequential for the European Union (EU) and its position on multilateralism. Their views on multilateralism differ from the EU's vision with regard to contents and methodology. Problematic for the EU is that their views not only structure the relations between the emerging powers themselves, but that these powers also increasingly try to promote them as the basic principles for structuring international relations and regimes on a global level.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Keukeleire & Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2014. "The BRICS and Other Emerging Power Alliances and Multilateral Organizations in the Asia-Pacific and the Global South: Challenges for the European Union and Its View on Multilateralism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 582-599, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:52:y:2014:i:3:p:582-599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens-Uwe Wunderlich, 2012. "The EU an Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 653-669, July.
    2. Robert H. Wade, 2011. "Emerging World Order? From Multipolarity to Multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF," Politics & Society, , vol. 39(3), pages 347-378, September.
    3. Ruggie, John Gerard, 1992. "Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 561-598, July.
    4. Paul Cammack, 2012. "The G20, the Crisis, and the Rise of Global Developmental Liberalism," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16.
    5. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:455-474 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Louise Van Schaik & Simon Schunz, 2012. "Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm‐ or Interest‐Driven Actor?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 169-186, January.
    7. Wade, Robert H., 2011. "Emerging world order? From multipolarity to multilateralism in the G20, the World Bank, and the IMF," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 38603, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Caporaso, James A., 1992. "International relations theory and multilateralism: the search for foundations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 599-632, July.
    9. Jolyon Howorth, 2010. "The EU as a Global Actor: Grand Strategy for a Global Grand Bargain?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 455-474, June.
    10. Gungwu Wang, 2012. "The China effect in anxious Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 335-340, December.
    11. World Bank, 2013. "World Development Indicators 2013," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13191.
    12. David Allen & Michael Smith, 2012. "Relations with the Rest of the World," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50, pages 162-177, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Byungwon Woo, 2021. "Empirical categorization of middle powers and how different middle powers are treated in international organizations: The case of India and South Korea," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 149-165, June.
    2. Anna Michalski & Zhongqi Pan, 2017. "Role Dynamics in a Structured Relationship: The EU–China Strategic Partnership," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 611-627, May.
    3. Margot Schüller & Jan Peter Wogart, 2017. "The emergence of post-crisis regional financial institutions in Asia—with a little help from Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 483-501, December.
    4. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric Tremolada Álvarez, 2018. "La Cooperación Internacional como alternativa a los unilateralismos. colección Ius Cogens n.° 6," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1037.
    2. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 912-938.
    3. Abdul Rahman, Nazira, 2014. "Multilateralism in the Straits of Malacca and Singapore," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 232-238.
    4. Cheng, Gong, 2015. "The Global Financial Safety Net through the Prism of G20 Summits," MPRA Paper 68070, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2015.
    5. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    6. Michał Dulak, 2023. "Contribution of subnational authorities to multilateralism from the EU perspective—Implementation of the SDGs," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(S2), pages 13-21, March.
    7. Vestergaard, Jakob & Wade, Robert H., 2013. "Protecting Power: How Western States Retain The Dominant Voice in The World Bank’s Governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 153-164.
    8. Tana Johnson & Johannes Urpelainen, 2020. "The more things change, the more they stay the same: Developing countries’ unity at the nexus of trade and environmental policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 445-473, April.
    9. Christensen, Rasmus Corlin & Hearson, Martin, 2021. "The Rise of China and Contestation in Global Tax Governance," SocArXiv pzvy3, Center for Open Science.
    10. Čelesnik Goran & Radujković Mladen & Vrečko Igor, 2018. "Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(4), pages 223-237, December.
    11. Thomas Hale & David Held & Kevin Young, 2013. "Gridlock: From Self-reinforcing Interdependence to Second-order Cooperation Problems," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(3), pages 223-235, September.
    12. Karim Knio, 2022. "Rethinking the Multilateral Order Between Liberal Internationalism and Neoliberalism/Neoliberalisation Processes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 6-14.
    13. Belesky, Paul, 2015. "Towards a New Political Economy of Food: State Capitalism and the Emergence of Neomercantilism in the Global Food System," Thesis Commons 8ckgz, Center for Open Science.
    14. Giles Mohan, 2012. "China in Africa: Impacts and prospects for accountable development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-012-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    15. Belesky, Paul, 2016. "Rice, politics and power: the political economy of food insecurity in East Asia," Thesis Commons hn264, Center for Open Science.
    16. Hongying Wang & Erik French, 2014. "China in Global Economic Governance," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 9(2), pages 254-271, July.
    17. van der Rijt, Tess & Pang (Pangestu), Tikki, 2015. "Governance within the World Health Assembly: A 13-year analysis of WHO Member States’ contribution to global health governance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 395-404.
    18. Yang, Deli & Sonmez, Mahmut (Maho), 2018. "Global norm of national treatment for patent uncertainties: A longitudinal comparison between the US and China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 164-176.
    19. Yang, Deli & Sonmez, Mahmut, 2013. "Integration and divergence of patent systems across national and international institutions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 527-538.
    20. Vestergaard Jakob & Wade Robert H., 2012. "The G20 has Served its Purpose and Should be Replaced," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:52:y:2014:i:3:p:582-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.