IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i3p21582440211036879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disagreement Strategies on Chinese Forums: Comparing Data From Hong Kong and Mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Yike Yang

Abstract

Prior research on disagreement has mainly focused on its negative impact, suggesting that disagreement should be avoided in communication. Consequently, disagreement is rarely studied in computer-mediated communication, particularly in the Chinese context. Adopting the interactional approach, this project pioneers the investigation of disagreement strategies on online forums in Hong Kong and mainland China, in hopes of providing insights into a better understanding of disagreement in the Chinese online context and shedding light on politeness theory in intercultural communication among Chinese people. Two threads on a similar topic were selected, from which 400 comments were collected and annotated for further analysis. Our results showed that, instead of being a face-threatening act, disagreement maintained and enhanced the interlocutors’ face and advanced the communication of information within each thread. Moreover, although the distribution of the five disagreement strategies was similar in the two sites, there were notably more disagreement tokens and negative comments on the Hong Kong forum. The observed divergence has been attributed to the different degrees of collectivism–individualism in the two regions, the internet censorship in mainland China and the nature of the two forums selected, which remain to be confirmed in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yike Yang, 2021. "Disagreement Strategies on Chinese Forums: Comparing Data From Hong Kong and Mainland China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211036879
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211036879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211036879
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211036879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael W Morris & Katherine Y Williams & Kwok Leung & Richard Larrick & M Teresa Mendoza & Deepti Bhatnagar & Jianfeng Li & Mari Kondo & Jin-Lian Luo & Jun-Chen Hu, 1998. "Conflict Management Style: Accounting for Cross-National Differences," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 29(4), pages 729-747, December.
    2. Agus Wijayanto & Aryati Prasetyarini & Mauly Halwat Hikmat, 2017. "Impoliteness in EFL: Foreign Language Learners’ Complaining Behaviors Across Social Distance and Status Levels," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lillian Y. Fok & Dinah M. Payne & Christy M. Corey, 2016. "Cultural Values, Utilitarian Orientation, and Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of U.S. and Puerto Rican Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 263-279, March.
    2. Daniel V. Holland & Dean A. Shepherd, 2013. "Deciding to Persist: Adversity, Values, and Entrepreneurs’ Decision Policies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(2), pages 331-358, March.
    3. Nina Pološki Vokić & Sanja Sontor, 2009. "Conflict Management Styles in Croatian Enterprises – The Relationship between Individual Characteristics and Conflict Handling Styles," EFZG Working Papers Series 0905, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    4. Mohammad Iranmanesh & Suhaiza Zailani & Sunghyup Sean Hyun & Mohd Helmi Ali & Kwangyong Kim, 2019. "Impact of Lean Manufacturing Practices on Firms’ Sustainable Performance: Lean Culture as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Somnath Lahiri & Karthik Dhandapani, 2021. "Project performance in emerging market: The influence of cultural distance and business group affiliation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 179-207, March.
    6. Asif Mehmood Rana & Kashif-ur-Rehman, 2015. "Inter Relationship between Team Conflict Management, Employee Satisfaction and Organizational Performance," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 7(2), pages 93-99.
    7. Gelbrich, Katja & Müller, Stefan, 2008. "Konfliktstile im interkulturellen Vergleich," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 5, number 52008.
    8. Kwon, Yung-Chul, 2008. "Antecedents and consequences of international joint venture partnerships: A social exchange perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 559-573, October.
    9. Rodney C. Runyan & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2019. "Small Business Orientation: A Construct Proposal," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(3), pages 529-552, May.
    10. Tjemkes, Brian V. & Furrer, Olivier & Adolfs, Koen & Aydinlik, Arzu Ülgen, 2012. "Response strategies in an international strategic alliance experimental context: Cross-country differences," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 66-84.
    11. Gunkel, Marjaana & Schlaegel, Christopher & Taras, Vas, 2016. "Cultural values, emotional intelligence, and conflict handling styles: A global study," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 568-585.
    12. Wang, Xuehua & Keh, Hean Tat, 2017. "Consumer susceptibility to cross-selling persuasion: The roles of self-construal and interpersonal harmony," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 177-184.
    13. Cenkci Ada T., 2018. "Leader Power, Conflict Handling Styles, and Subordinate Compliance: A Study on Information Technology Professionals in Turkey," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(1), pages 18-35, March.
    14. Swee Hoon Chuah & Robert Hoffmann & Bala Ramasamy & Jonathan H. W. Tan, 2016. "Is there a Spirit of Overseas Chinese Capitalism?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1095-1118, December.
    15. Fainshmidt, Stav & White, George O. & Cangioni, Carole, 2014. "Legal Distance, Cognitive Distance, and Conflict Resolution in International Business Intellectual Property Disputes," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 188-200.
    16. Hannes Hauswald & Andreas Hack & Franz W. Kellermanns & Holger Patzelt, 2016. "Attracting New Talent to Family Firms: Who is Attracted and under what Conditions?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(5), pages 963-989, September.
    17. Morris, Michael W. & Fu, Ho-Ying, 2000. "How Does Culture Influence Conflict Resolution? A Dynamic Constructive Analysis," Research Papers 1649, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    18. Chao C. Chen & Ali F. Ünal & Kwok Leung & Katherine R. Xin, 2016. "Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 903-934, December.
    19. Ainuddin, R. Azimah & Beamish, Paul W. & Hulland, John S. & Rouse, Michael J., 2007. "Resource attributes and firm performance in international joint ventures," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 47-60, March.
    20. Dean Tjosvold & Kenneth S. Law & Haifa F. Sun, 2003. "Collectivistic and Individualistic Values: Their Effects on Group Dynamics and Productivity in China," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 243-263, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211036879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.