IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i2p333-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A two-stage Gaussian process regression model for remaining useful prediction of bearings

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Cui
  • Licai Cao
  • Tianxiao Zhang

Abstract

Bearing is one of the most important supporting components in mechanical equipment and its health status has a significant impact on the overall performance of equipment. The remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of bearings is critical in adopting a condition-based maintenance strategy to ensure reliable equipment operation. To accurately predict the RUL of bearings, this paper proposes a two-stage Gaussian process regression (GPR) model, which combines the flexibility of the Gaussian process and the physical mechanism of the Wiener process. Compared with the conventional GPR model, the proposed model can reasonably adapt to the statistical characteristics of bearings degradation and provide more stable predictions. In addition, the paper proposes a new degradation detection approach based on the Euclidean distance to distinguish the two stages of the bearing service life cycle, which considers the global characteristics of bearing degradation and can accurately detect the beginning point of bearing degradation. The experimental results show that the proposed two-stage GPR model can help to improve the precision and accuracy of degradation path tracking and RUL prediction.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Cui & Licai Cao & Tianxiao Zhang, 2024. "A two-stage Gaussian process regression model for remaining useful prediction of bearings," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(2), pages 333-348, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:2:p:333-348
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X221141744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X221141744
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X221141744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jinglong & Jing, Hongjie & Chang, Yuanhong & Liu, Qian, 2019. "Gated recurrent unit based recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of nonlinear deterioration process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 372-382.
    2. Hu, Yaogang & Li, Hui & Shi, Pingping & Chai, Zhaosen & Wang, Kun & Xie, Xiangjie & Chen, Zhe, 2018. "A prediction method for the real-time remaining useful life of wind turbine bearings based on the Wiener process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 452-460.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Shujie & Fan, Lexian, 2022. "An adaptive prediction approach for rolling bearing remaining useful life based on multistage model with three-source variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    2. Li, Yuanfu & Chen, Yifan & Shao, Haonan & Zhang, Huisheng, 2023. "A novel dual attention mechanism combined with knowledge for remaining useful life prediction based on gated recurrent units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Wen, Pengfei & Zhao, Shuai & Chen, Shaowei & Li, Yong, 2021. "A generalized remaining useful life prediction method for complex systems based on composite health indicator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Chang, Yuanhong & Li, Fudong & Chen, Jinglong & Liu, Yulang & Li, Zipeng, 2022. "Efficient temporal flow Transformer accompanied with multi-head probsparse self-attention mechanism for remaining useful life prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Li, Naipeng & Gebraeel, Nagi & Lei, Yaguo & Fang, Xiaolei & Cai, Xiao & Yan, Tao, 2021. "Remaining useful life prediction based on a multi-sensor data fusion model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Li, Da & Zhang, Zhaosheng & Zhou, Litao & Liu, Peng & Wang, Zhenpo & Deng, Junjun, 2022. "Multi-time-step and multi-parameter prediction for real-world proton exchange membrane fuel cell vehicles (PEMFCVs) toward fault prognosis and energy consumption prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    8. Shi, Yan & Behrensdorf, Jasper & Zhou, Jiayan & Hu, Yue & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2024. "Network reliability analysis through survival signature and machine learning techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Zhu, Ting & Chen, Zhen & Zhou, Di & Xia, Tangbin & Pan, Ershun, 2024. "Adaptive staged remaining useful life prediction of roller in a hot strip mill based on multi-scale LSTM with multi-head attention," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Wang, Bin & Wang, Jun, 2021. "Energy futures price prediction and evaluation model with deep bidirectional gated recurrent unit neural network and RIF-based algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Li, Naipeng & Gebraeel, Nagi & Lei, Yaguo & Bian, Linkan & Si, Xiaosheng, 2019. "Remaining useful life prediction of machinery under time-varying operating conditions based on a two-factor state-space model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 88-100.
    12. Moradi, Ramin & Cofre-Martel, Sergio & Lopez Droguett, Enrique & Modarres, Mohammad & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Integration of deep learning and Bayesian networks for condition and operation risk monitoring of complex engineering systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Guo, Kai & Ye, Zhisheng & Liu, Datong & Peng, Xiyuan, 2021. "UAV flight control sensing enhancement with a data-driven adaptive fusion model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Zhang, Jiusi & Jiang, Yuchen & Wu, Shimeng & Li, Xiang & Luo, Hao & Yin, Shen, 2022. "Prediction of remaining useful life based on bidirectional gated recurrent unit with temporal self-attention mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    15. Wei, Meng & Ye, Min & Zhang, Chuanwei & Li, Yan & Zhang, Jiale & Wang, Qiao, 2023. "A multi-scale learning approach for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on variational mode decomposition and Monte Carlo sampling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    16. Lixiao Cao & Zheng Qian & Hamid Zareipour & David Wood & Ehsan Mollasalehi & Shuangshu Tian & Yan Pei, 2018. "Prediction of Remaining Useful Life of Wind Turbine Bearings under Non-Stationary Operating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Cai, Xiao & Li, Naipeng & Xie, Min, 2024. "RUL prediction for two-phase degrading systems considering physical damage observations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    18. He, Yuxuan & Su, Huai & Zio, Enrico & Peng, Shiliang & Fan, Lin & Yang, Zhaoming & Yang, Zhe & Zhang, Jinjun, 2023. "A systematic method of remaining useful life estimation based on physics-informed graph neural networks with multisensor data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    19. Rommel, D.P. & Di Maio, D. & Tinga, T., 2020. "Calculating wind turbine component loads for improved life prediction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 223-241.
    20. Hu, Tao & Guo, Yiming & Gu, Liudong & Zhou, Yifan & Zhang, Zhisheng & Zhou, Zhiting, 2022. "Remaining useful life prediction of bearings under different working conditions using a deep feature disentanglement based transfer learning method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:2:p:333-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.