IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v234y2020i4p611-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidisciplinary reliability analysis of turbine blade with shape uncertainty by Kriging model and free-form deformation methods

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Yang
  • Zhimin Xu

Abstract

This work presents an integrated approach for the multidisciplinary reliability analysis of turbine blades with shape uncertainty, including the metamodel, the free-form deformation, and the Monte Carlo simulation. The multidisciplinary analysis of turbine blade includes fluid, structure, and thermal analyses, which is time-consuming during integration with multidisciplinary reliability analysis. The metamodel is constructed by adaptive sampling to reduce computational cost. The shape uncertainty with small size changes in reliability analysis should be considered. The geometry-based multidisciplinary analysis may fail to capture the small size changes during the geometry and mesh regeneration process. The main contribution of this article is to introduce the free-form deformation in multidisciplinary reliability analysis to overcome the aforementioned problems. The mesh-based method supported by free-form deformation is proposed. Failure probability analysis of the multidisciplinary blade system is performed using the Monte Carlo simulation and the surrogate model. Through the numerical simulation, it is found that the failure probability increases as the blade shape uncertainty becomes larger. The methodology in this article provides a valuable and applicative way to calculate the risk of blade in multidisciplinary system.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Yang & Zhimin Xu, 2020. "Multidisciplinary reliability analysis of turbine blade with shape uncertainty by Kriging model and free-form deformation methods," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(4), pages 611-621, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:4:p:611-621
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X19901041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X19901041
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X19901041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bichon, Barron J. & McFarland, John M. & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2011. "Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1386-1395.
    2. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Zuo, Ming J. & Zhou, Chengning, 2018. "A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 330-338.
    3. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    4. Yang, Xufeng & Liu, Yongshou & Mi, Caiying & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "System reliability analysis through active learning Kriging model with truncated candidate region," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 235-241.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiongxiong You & Mengya Zhang & Diyin Tang & Zhanwen Niu, 2022. "An active learning method combining adaptive kriging and weighted penalty for structural reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 160-172, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang & Xiao, Mi, 2020. "A composite-projection-outline-based approximation method for system reliability analysis with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    2. Yuan, Kai & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Wang, Zhonglai & Shang, Kun, 2020. "System reliability analysis by combining structure function and active learning kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Wang, Dapeng & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming, 2020. "EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Jiang, Chen & Yan, Yifang & Wang, Dapeng & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang, 2021. "Global and local Kriging limit state approximation for time-dependent reliability-based design optimization through wrong-classification probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    6. Wang, Jian & Sun, Zhili & Cao, Runan, 2021. "An efficient and robust Kriging-based method for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Zhang, Jinhao & Xiao, Mi & Gao, Liang, 2019. "An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 90-102.
    8. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    9. Xiongxiong You & Mengya Zhang & Diyin Tang & Zhanwen Niu, 2022. "An active learning method combining adaptive kriging and weighted penalty for structural reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 160-172, February.
    10. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Li, Kai-Shang & Wang, Ji & Wang, Xiao-Wei & Hideo, Miura & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2022. "A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    11. Li, Meng & Sadoughi, Mohammadkazem & Hu, Zhen & Hu, Chao, 2020. "A hybrid Gaussian process model for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Zhou, Yicheng & Lu, Zhenzhou & Yun, Wanying, 2020. "Active sparse polynomial chaos expansion for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    13. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2021. "A Kriging-assisted sampling method for reliability analysis of structures with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    14. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    15. Li, Junxiang & Chen, Jianqiao, 2019. "Solving time-variant reliability-based design optimization by PSO-t-IRS: A methodology incorporating a particle swarm optimization algorithm and an enhanced instantaneous response surface," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Wang, Jiaqi & Zhang, Limao & Yang, Hui & Liu, Huabei & Skibniewski, Mirosław J., 2024. "Dynamic reliability analysis of Aerial Building Machine under extreme wind loads using improved QBDC-based active learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    17. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    18. Li, Xiaoke & Zhu, Heng & Chen, Zhenzhong & Ming, Wuyi & Cao, Yang & He, Wenbin & Ma, Jun, 2022. "Limit state Kriging modeling for reliability-based design optimization through classification uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Meng, Yuan & Zhang, Dequan & Shi, Baojun & Wang, Dapeng & Wang, Fang, 2024. "An active learning Kriging model with approximating parallel strategy for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    20. Li, Guosheng & Ma, Shuaichao & Zhang, Dequan & Yang, Leping & Zhang, Weihua & Wu, Zeping, 2024. "An efficient sequential anisotropic RBF reliability analysis method with fast cross-validation and parallelizability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:234:y:2020:i:4:p:611-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.