IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i5p731-746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic process for modeling failures of a system having a non-monotonic hazard rate function

Author

Listed:
  • Lucianne Varn
  • Stefanka Chukova
  • Richard Arnold

Abstract

Reliability literature on modeling failures of repairable systems mostly deals with systems having monotonically increasing hazard/failure rates. When the hazard rate of a system is non-monotonic, models developed for monotonically increasing failure rates cannot be effectively applied without making assumptions on the types of repair performed following system failures. For instance, for systems having bathtub-shaped hazard rates, it is assumed that during the initial, decreasing hazard rate phase, all repairs are minimal. These assumptions on the type of general repair can be restrictive. In order to relax these assumptions, it has been suggested that general repairs in the initially decreasing phase can be modeled as “aging†the system. This approach however does not preserve the order of effectiveness of the types of general repair as defined in the literature. In this article, we develop a set of models to address these shortcomings. We propose a new stochastic process to model consecutive failures of repairable systems having non-monotonic, specifically bathtub-shaped, hazard rates, where the types of general repair are not restricted and the order of the effectiveness of the types of repair is preserved. The proposed models guarantee that a repaired system is at least as reliable as one that has not failed (or equivalently one that has been minimally repaired). To illustrate the models, we present multiple examples and simulate the failure-repair process and estimate the quantities of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucianne Varn & Stefanka Chukova & Richard Arnold, 2019. "A stochastic process for modeling failures of a system having a non-monotonic hazard rate function," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 731-746, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:5:p:731-746
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18818580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18818580
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18818580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    2. Cha, Ji Hwan & Pulcini, Gianpaolo, 2016. "Optimal burn-in procedure for mixed populations based on the device degradation process history," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 988-998.
    3. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein & Ming Zuo, 2013. "Optimal burn-in and preventive maintenance warranty strategies with time-dependent maintenance costs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(9), pages 1024-1033.
    4. Dijoux, Yann, 2009. "A virtual age model based on a bathtub shaped initial intensity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(5), pages 982-989.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.
    2. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    3. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    4. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    5. Mahmood Shafiee & Maxim Finkelstein, 2015. "A proactive group maintenance policy for continuously monitored deteriorating systems: Application to offshore wind turbines," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(5), pages 373-384, October.
    6. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    7. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Huang, Chao-Da & Ho, Jyh-Wen, 2017. "A customized two-dimensional extended warranty with preventive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 971-978.
    8. Mohammadi, Faezeh & Izadi, Muhyiddin & Lai, Chin-Diew, 2016. "On testing whether burn-in is required under the long-run average cost," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 217-224.
    9. Yukun Wang & Yiliu Liu & Aibo Zhang, 2019. "Preventive maintenance optimization for repairable products considering two-dimensional warranty and customer satisfaction," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 553-566, August.
    10. Lijun Shang & Guojun Shang & Qingan Qiu, 2022. "A Bivariate Post-Warranty Maintenance Model for the Product under a 2D Warranty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Zheng, Rui & Zhao, Xufeng & Hu, Chaoming & Ren, Xiangyun, 2023. "A repair-replacement policy for a system subject to missions of random types and random durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    12. Xiaofeng Wang & Shu Guo & Jian Shen & Yang Liu, 2020. "Optimization of preventive maintenance for series manufacturing system by differential evolution algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 745-757, March.
    13. Hu, Wei & Yang, Zhaojun & Chen, Chuanhai & Wu, Yue & Xie, Qunya, 2021. "A Weibull-based recurrent regression model for repairable systems considering double effects of operation and maintenance: A case study of machine tools," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Lin, Zu-Liang & Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Fang, Chih-Chiang, 2015. "Non-periodic preventive maintenance with reliability thresholds for complex repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    15. Liu, Bin & Wu, Jun & Xie, Min, 2015. "Cost analysis for multi-component system with failure interaction under renewing free-replacement warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 874-882.
    16. Wang, Yukun & Liu, Yiliu & Liu, Zixian & Li, Xiaopeng, 2017. "On reliability improvement program for second-hand products sold with a two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 452-463.
    17. Remy, Emmanuel & Corset, Franck & Despréaux, Stéphane & Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier, 2013. "An example of integrated approach to technical and economic optimization of maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 8-19.
    18. Zhi-Sheng Ye & Loon-Ching Tang & Min Xie, 2014. "Bi-objective burn-in modeling and optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 201-214, January.
    19. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2022. "A new warranty policy for heterogeneous items subject to monotone degradation processes," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 55-65, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:5:p:731-746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.