IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v230y2016i3p297-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability estimation considering usage rate profile and warranty claims

Author

Listed:
  • Shah Limon
  • Om Prakash Yadav
  • Ming J Zuo
  • Jason Muscha
  • Russell Honeyman

Abstract

Providing more realistic reliability prediction based on small proportion of failed population or test data has always been a challenging task. Manufacturers rely heavily on reliability prediction for designing warranty plan. Furthermore, to predict warranty claims for the remaining warranty period, it is important to have more realistic reliability assessment by considering a larger proportion of the population or the maximum possible information on the remaining population. However, generally this information is not readily available and is very difficult to gather on the scattered population. In this work, we propose to use customer usage rate profile to generate censored usage data on the remaining population that do not have any failure and warranty claims yet. We intend to use field data available such as warranty claims, field failures, recall data, and maintenance data to develop usage rate profile and subsequently estimate censored usage time. Finally, reliability estimation methodology is developed considering both censored data and field failure data to provide more reasonable reliability prediction for the remaining warranty period. The proposed methodology is demonstrated considering real-life data from a big manufacturing company.

Suggested Citation

  • Shah Limon & Om Prakash Yadav & Ming J Zuo & Jason Muscha & Russell Honeyman, 2016. "Reliability estimation considering usage rate profile and warranty claims," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(3), pages 297-308, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:3:p:297-308
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X16631202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X16631202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X16631202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jung, M. & Bai, D.S., 2007. "Analysis of field data under two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 135-143.
    2. Haitao Liao & Elsayed A. Elsayed, 2006. "Reliability inference for field conditions from accelerated degradation testing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(6), pages 576-587, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Shaomin, 2014. "Construction of asymmetric copulas and its application in two-dimensional reliability modelling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 476-485.
    2. Zhai, Qingqing & Chen, Piao & Hong, Lanqing & Shen, Lijuan, 2018. "A random-effects Wiener degradation model based on accelerated failure time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 94-103.
    3. Wang, Pingping & Tang, Yincai & Joo Bae, Suk & He, Yong, 2018. "Bayesian analysis of two-phase degradation data based on change-point Wiener process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 244-256.
    4. Gupta, Sanjib Kumar & De, Soumen & Chatterjee, Aditya, 2014. "Warranty forecasting from incomplete two-dimensional warranty data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Lin, Kunsong & Chen, Yunxia, 2021. "Analysis of two-dimensional warranty data considering global and local dependence of heterogeneous marginals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Ao, Dan & Hu, Zhen & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2017. "Design of validation experiments for life prediction models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 22-33.
    7. Park, Minjae & Jung, Ki Mun & Park, Dong Ho, 2018. "Optimization of periodic preventive maintenance policy following the expiration of two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Gupta, Sanjib Kumar & Bhattacharya, Debasis, 2022. "Non-parametric estimation of bivariate reliability from incomplete two-dimensional warranty data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Yan, Bingxin & Ma, Xiaobing & Yang, Li & Wang, Han & Wu, Tianyi, 2020. "A novel degradation-rate-volatility related effect Wiener process model with its extension to accelerated ageing data analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    10. Minjae Park & Ki Mun Jung & Dong Ho Park, 2016. "Optimal warranty policies considering repair service and replacement service under the manufacturer’s perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(1), pages 117-132, September.
    11. Wu, Shaomin, 2011. "Warranty claim analysis considering human factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 131-138.
    12. Pang, Zhenan & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Du, Dangbo & Pei, Hong, 2021. "A Bayesian Inference for Remaining Useful Life Estimation by Fusing Accelerated Degradation Data and Condition Monitoring Data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    13. Yousefi, Nooshin & Coit, David W. & Song, Sanling, 2020. "Reliability analysis of systems considering clusters of dependent degrading components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    14. Jung, Ki Mun & Park, Minjae & Park, Dong Ho, 2010. "System maintenance cost dependent on life cycle under renewing warranty policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 816-821.
    15. Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Chen, Nan & Shen, Yan, 2015. "A new class of Wiener process models for degradation analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 58-67.
    16. Wang, Lizhi & Pan, Rong & Li, Xiaoyang & Jiang, Tongmin, 2013. "A Bayesian reliability evaluation method with integrated accelerated degradation testing and field information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 38-47.
    17. Le Liu & Xiao-Yang Li & Enrico Zio & Rui Kang & Tong-Min Jiang, 2017. "Model Uncertainty in Accelerated Degradation Testing Analysis," Post-Print hal-01652218, HAL.
    18. Jen Tang & Tsui‐Shu Su, 2008. "Estimating failure time distribution and its parameters based on intermediate data from a Wiener degradation model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(3), pages 265-276, April.
    19. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    20. Jack, N. & Iskandar, B.P. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2009. "A repair–replace strategy based on usage rate for items sold with a two-dimensional warranty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 611-617.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:3:p:297-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.