IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v230y2016i3p278-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A failure rate interaction model for two-component systems based on copula function

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Peng
  • Xiaoling Zhang
  • Hong-Zhong Huang

Abstract

Failure rate estimation of a component or a system plays an important role for reliability analysis and maintenance decision-making. In some systems, failure mechanisms from different components interact with each other, and the interaction may accelerate the failure procedure of a certain component. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the correlation of failures from different components for obtaining an accurate reliability prediction. In this article, a failure rate interaction model for two components based on copula function is proposed. In this model, the failure correlation of two components in the same system is estimated using copula function. Then, the joint failure probability distribution function of the two components and the conditional failure probability distribution of failures for each component are determined. Finally, the failure rate is calculated considering the correlation of failures between components, and the failure rate estimation of the oil pump and oil seal is presented and discussed to illustrate the validity of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Peng & Xiaoling Zhang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2016. "A failure rate interaction model for two-component systems based on copula function," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(3), pages 278-284, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:3:p:278-284
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X16629855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X16629855
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X16629855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Yong & Ma, Lin & Mathew, Joseph & Zhang, Sheng, 2006. "An analytical model for interactive failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(5), pages 495-504.
    2. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan & Jardine, Andrew K.S., 2010. "Periodic inspection optimization model for a complex repairable system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 944-952.
    3. Murthy, D. N. P. & Nguyen, D. G., 1985. "Study of a multi-component system with failure interaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 330-338, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tian, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy considering failure dependence and imperfect inspection for a two-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Vimal Vijayan & Sanjay K Chaturvedi & Ritesh Chandra, 2020. "A failure interaction model for multicomponent repairable systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 470-486, June.
    3. Tazi, Nacef & Châtelet, Eric & Bouzidi, Youcef, 2018. "How combined performance and propagation of failure dependencies affect the reliability of a MSS," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 531-541.
    4. Pol, Johannes C. & Kindermann, Paulina & van der Krogt, Mark G. & van Bergeijk, Vera M. & Remmerswaal, Guido & Kanning, Willem & Jonkman, Sebastiaan N. & Kok, Matthijs, 2023. "The effect of interactions between failure mechanisms on the reliability of flood defenses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Meango, Toualith Jean-Marc & Ouali, Mohamed-Salah, 2020. "Failure interaction model based on extreme shock and Markov processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Berrade, M.D. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Scarf, P.A., 2013. "Modelling imperfect inspection over a finite horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-29.
    7. Hajipour, Yassin & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2016. "Non-periodic inspection optimization of multi-component and k-out-of-m systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 228-243.
    8. Shen, Jingyuan & Hu, Jiawen & Ma, Yizhong, 2020. "Two preventive replacement strategies for systems with protective auxiliary parts subject to degradation and economic dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    9. Nazarizadeh, Farzaneh & Alemtabriz, Akbar & Zandieh, Mostafa & Raad, Abbas, 2022. "An analytical model for reliability assessment of the rail system considering dependent failures (case study of Iranian railway)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Zhang, Chengjie & Qi, Faqun & Zhang, Ning & Li, Yong & Huang, Hongzhong, 2022. "Maintenance policy optimization for multi-component systems considering dynamic importance of components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    11. Wang, Wenbin & Zhao, Fei & Peng, Rui, 2014. "A preventive maintenance model with a two-level inspection policy based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 207-220.
    12. Zhang, Nan & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne, 2017. "Maintenance analysis of a two-component load-sharing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 67-74.
    13. Levitin, Gregory & Finkelstein, Maxim & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2019. "Scheduling of imperfect inspections for reliability critical systems with shock-driven defects and delayed failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 89-98.
    14. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    15. Chen, Rentong & Zhang, Chao & Wang, Shaoping & Zio, Enrico & Dui, Hongyan & Zhang, Yadong, 2023. "Importance measures for critical components in complex system based on Copula Hierarchical Bayesian Network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Zhuoqi Zhang & Su Wu & Binfeng Li & Seungchul Lee, 2015. "(, ) type maintenance policy for multi-component systems with failure interactions," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 1051-1064, April.
    17. Wang, Wei & Wu, Zhiying & Xiong, Junlin & Xu, Yaofeng, 2018. "Redundancy optimization of cold-standby systems under periodic inspection and maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 394-402.
    18. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V., 2018. "Conditional inspection and maintenance of a system with two interacting components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 533-544.
    19. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2015. "Optimal loading of system with random repair time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 137-143.
    20. Lee, Juseong & Mitici, Mihaela, 2020. "An integrated assessment of safety and efficiency of aircraft maintenance strategies using agent-based modelling and stochastic Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:230:y:2016:i:3:p:278-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.