IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v40y2012i5p584-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Property Assessment Standards on Property Tax Burden

Author

Listed:
  • Seth B. Payton

Abstract

Property tax is a tax on estimated values rather than on transactions—an important distinction from other taxes. Another distinction is that each state develops its own system for administering the property tax, including how properties are assessed. The consensus among scholars is that current market value assessment is the standard for achieving the most fair and equitable property tax burden. This study compares two disparate assessment standards in one urban county, analyzing potential determinants of systematic bias. The findings indicate that less systematic bias exists under the market value standard, but that the overall equity is only marginally better horizontally and tended toward a more regressive tax structure. A market value assessment standard may mitigate the inherent inequity (i.e., systematic bias) in a nonmarket value system. However, the inequities in the market value system, which may be less predictable, still must be monitored and addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth B. Payton, 2012. "The Impact of Property Assessment Standards on Property Tax Burden," Public Finance Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 584-613, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:40:y:2012:i:5:p:584-613
    DOI: 10.1177/1091142111431254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1091142111431254
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1091142111431254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William C. Goolsby, 1997. "Assessment Error in the Valuation of Owner-Occupied Housing," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 13(1), pages 33-46.
    2. Gatzlaff, Dean H. & Haurin, Donald R., 1998. "Sample Selection and Biases in Local House Value Indices," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 199-222, March.
    3. Marcus T. Allen & William H. Dare, 2002. "Identifying Determinants of Horizontal Property Tax Inequity: Evidence from Florida," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 24(2), pages 153-164.
    4. Brent C. Smith, 2000. "Applying Models for Vertical Inequity in the Property Tax to a Non-Market Value State," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 19(3), pages 321-344.
    5. Chicoine, David L. & Giertz, J. Fred, 1988. "Uniformity in a Dual Assessment System," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 41(2), pages 247-56, June.
    6. McMillen, Daniel P. & Weber, Rachel N., 2008. "Thin Markets and Property Tax Inequities: A Multinomial Logit Approach," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 61(4), pages 653-671, December.
    7. Brian J. L. Berry & Robert S. Bednarz, 1975. "A Hedonic Model of Prices and Assessments for Single-Family Homes: Does the Assessor Follow the Market or the Market Follow the Assessor?," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 51(1), pages 21-40.
    8. O'Sullivan, Arthur & Sexton, Terri A. & Sheffrin, Steven M., 1994. "Differential Burdens from the Assessment Provisions of Proposition 13," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 47(4), pages 721-30, December.
    9. O'Sullivan, Arthur & Sexton, Terri A. & Sheffrin, Steven M., 1994. "Differential Burdens From the Assessment Provisions of Proposition 13," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 47(4), pages 721-730, December.
    10. Chicoine, David L. & Giertz, J. Fred, 1988. "Uniformity in a Dual Assessment System," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 41(2), pages 247-256, June.
    11. Sexton, Terri A. & Sheffrin, Steven M. & O’Sullivan, Arthur, 1999. "Proposition 13: Unintended Effects and Feasible Reforms," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 52(1), pages 99-112, March.
    12. Richard L. Cole & John Kincaid, 2006. "Public Opinion on U.S. Federal and Intergovernmental Issues in 2006: Continuity and Change," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 443-459.
    13. Justin M. Ross, 2011. "Assessor Incentives and Property Assessment," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 77(3), pages 776-794, January.
    14. Sexton, Terri A. & Sheffrin, Steven M. & O’Sullivan, Arthur, 1999. "Proposition 13: Unintended Effects and Feasible Reforms," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 52(n. 1), pages 99-112, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gebhard Kirchgassner, 2002. "The effects of fiscal institutions on public finance: a survey of the empirical evidence," Chapters, in: Stanley L. Winer & Hirofumi Shibata (ed.), Political Economy and Public Finance, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Gary C. Cornia & Barrett A. Slade, 2005. "Property Taxation of Multifamily Housing: An Empirical Analysis of Vertical and Horizontal Equity and Assessment Methods," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 27(1), pages 17-46.
    3. Rachel N. Weber & Daniel P. McMillen, 2010. "Ask and Ye Shall Receive? Predicting the Successful Appeal of Property Tax Assessments," Public Finance Review, , vol. 38(1), pages 74-101, January.
    4. Mary Beal & Mary O. Borg & Harriet Stranahan, 2017. "The Equity Effects of Property Tax Caps: Evidence from Florida," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 6, July.
    5. Mayor, Karen & Lyons, Seán & Tol, Richard S. J., 2010. "Designing a property tax without property values: Analysis in the case of Ireland," Papers WP352, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    6. Shi, Song & Young, Martin & Hargreaves, Bob, 2009. "Issues in measuring a monthly house price index in New Zealand," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 336-350, December.
    7. Ferreira, Fernando, 2010. "You can take it with you: Proposition 13 tax benefits, residential mobility, and willingness to pay for housing amenities," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(9-10), pages 661-673, October.
    8. Ayşe İmrohoroğlu & Kyle Matoba & Şelale Tüzel, 2018. "Proposition 13: An Equilibrium Analysis," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 24-51, April.
    9. James Mak, 2016. "Creating Tourism Improvement Districts to Raise Stable Funding for Destination Marketing and Promotion," Working Papers 2016-2, University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
    10. Geoffrey Propheter, 2014. "Assessment Administration and Performance during the Great Recession," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(5), pages 662-685, September.
    11. John Deskins & William Fox, 2008. "Measuring Behavioral Responses to the Property Tax," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0816, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    12. Liu, Shimeng & Yang, Xi, 2020. "Property tax limits and female labor supply: Evidence from the housing boom and bust," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    13. Olha Krupa, 2014. "Housing Crisis and Vertical Equity of the Property Tax in a Market Value–based Assessment System," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(5), pages 555-581, September.
    14. Xiandeng Jiang & Zheng Pan & Ningru Zhao, 2023. "Relative Value vs Absolute Value: Housing Wealth and Labor Supply," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 41-76, January.
    15. Dronyk-Trosper, Trey, 2017. "Getting what we vote for: A regression discontinuity test of ballot initiative outcomes," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 46-56.
    16. Edward C. Waters & David W. Holland & Bruce A. Weber, 1997. "Economic Impacts of a Property Tax Limitation: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Oregon's Measure 5," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 73(1), pages 72-89.
    17. Brent C Smith, 2008. "Intrajurisdictional Segmentation of Property Tax Burdens: Neighborhood Inequities Across an Urban Sphere," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 30(2), pages 207-224.
    18. Gabe, Todd & Rubin, Jonathan & Allen, Thomas & Reilly, Catherine, 2004. "Fiscal Effects of a One-Percent Property Tax Cap on Maine Municipalities and the State Government," MPRA Paper 66701, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Lars P. Feld & Gebhard Kirchgassner, 2006. "On the Effectiveness of Debt Brakes: The Swiss Experience," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-21, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    20. Emmanouil M. L. Economou & Nicholas C. Kyriazis & Theodore Metaxas, 2017. "Ancient Athenians, Californians and Modern Greeks: A Comparative Analysis of Choice Set Under Direct Democracy Procedures," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 47-65, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:40:y:2012:i:5:p:584-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.