IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ntj/journl/v61y2008i4p653-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thin Markets and Property Tax Inequities: A Multinomial Logit Approach

Author

Listed:
  • McMillen, Daniel P.
  • Weber, Rachel N.

Abstract

When property tax assessment ratios vary, the costs of public services are unevenly redistributed. More sales in a census tract should help to improve assessment uniformity while providing homeowners with a stronger basis for appeals. Using data from Chicago to estimate a multinomial logit model that characterizes the distribution of assessment ratios, we find that a variable measuring sales frequency is highly significant with the predicted effect: both unusually high and low ratios are more likely to occur in areas with few comparable sales. We find less evidence to support the notion that thin markets are responsible for regressive distributions, whereby assessment ratios are higher for low–value homes than they are for high–value ones. Accounting for sales frequency reduces but does not eliminate our finding of regressivity.

Suggested Citation

  • McMillen, Daniel P. & Weber, Rachel N., 2008. "Thin Markets and Property Tax Inequities: A Multinomial Logit Approach," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 61(4), pages 653-671, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:61:y:2008:i:4:p:653-71
    DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2008.4.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.4.05
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.4.05
    Download Restriction: Access is restricted to subscribers and members of the National Tax Association.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17310/ntj.2008.4.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos F. Avenancio-León & Troup Howard, 2020. "The Assessment Gap: Racial Inequalities in Property Taxation," Opportunity and Inclusive Growth Institute Working Papers 34, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    2. Olha Krupa, 2014. "Housing Crisis and Vertical Equity of the Property Tax in a Market Value–based Assessment System," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(5), pages 555-581, September.
    3. Mayor, Karen & Lyons, Seán & Tol, Richard S. J., 2010. "Designing a property tax without property values: Analysis in the case of Ireland," Papers WP352, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Shi, Song & Young, Martin & Hargreaves, Bob, 2009. "Issues in measuring a monthly house price index in New Zealand," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 336-350, December.
    5. Fatin Afiqah Md. Azmi, 2022. "Patterns in Number of Property Transactions of Pre-War Shophouse Case Study: Penang, Malacca and Kelantan ," GATR Journals gjbssr614, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    6. Seth B. Payton, 2012. "The Impact of Property Assessment Standards on Property Tax Burden," Public Finance Review, , vol. 40(5), pages 584-613, September.
    7. Rachel N. Weber & Daniel P. McMillen, 2010. "Ask and Ye Shall Receive? Predicting the Successful Appeal of Property Tax Assessments," Public Finance Review, , vol. 38(1), pages 74-101, January.
    8. Justin M. Ross, 2012. "Interjurisdictional Determinants of Property Assessment Regressivity," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(1), pages 28-42.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ntj:journl:v:61:y:2008:i:4:p:653-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The University of Chicago Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ntanet.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.