IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v3y1975i3p229-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward the More Optimal Provision of Local Public Goods: Internalization of Benefits or Intergovernmental Grants?

Author

Listed:
  • Melville L. McMillan

    (University of Wisconsin—Madison)

Abstract

Given the spatial character of many local “public†goods, the traditional recommendations for internalizing benefits–either rejurisdiction or grants–appear insufficient to achieve the optimal levels of output. This analysis indicates that frequently both rejurisdiction and grants are necessary. Contrary to the conventional opinion, the economically optimal constitution may allow spillovers, and such internalization as is required can be more appropriately accomplished not by the extension of boundaries, but by their restriction and the addition of more jurisdictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Melville L. McMillan, 1975. "Toward the More Optimal Provision of Local Public Goods: Internalization of Benefits or Intergovernmental Grants?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 3(3), pages 229-260, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:3:y:1975:i:3:p:229-260
    DOI: 10.1177/109114217500300302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114217500300302
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/109114217500300302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon Tullock, 1969. "Federalism: Problems of scale," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 19-29, March.
    2. Jerome Rothenberg, 1970. "Local Decentralization and the Theory of Optimal Government," NBER Chapters, in: The Analysis of Public Output, pages 31-68, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Olson, Mancur, Jr, 1969. "The Principle of "Fiscal Equivalence": The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 479-487, May.
    4. Pauly, Mark V, 1970. "Optimality, 'Public' Goods, and Local Governments: A General Theoretical Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(3), pages 572-585, May-June.
    5. Connolly, Michael, 1970. "Public Goods, Externalities, and International Relations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(2), pages 279-290, March-Apr.
    6. Michael Connolly, 1972. "Trade in Public Goods: A Diagrammatic Analysis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 86(1), pages 61-78.
    7. Julius Margolis, 1970. "The Analysis of Public Output," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number marg70-1.
    8. Feldstein, Martin S, 1972. "Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 32-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stehn, Jürgen, 1993. "Theorie des fiskalischen Föderalismus: Ein Referenzmaßstab zur Beurteilung der Beschlüsse von Maastricht," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1898, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Sandler, Todd & Tschirhart, John T, 1980. "The Economic Theory of Clubs: An Evaluative Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1481-1521, December.
    3. Stehn, Jürgen, 1993. "Maastricht und das Subsidiaritätsprinzip," Kiel Working Papers 553, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Stehn, Jürgen, 1995. "Perspektiven der sozialen Marktwirtschaft - mehr Effizienz durch eine föderative Arbeitsteilung," Kiel Working Papers 680, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Schäfer Wolf, 2007. "Europäische Union: Erweiterung cum Vertiefung? Erweiterung versus Vertiefung! / European Union: Enlarging cum Deepening? Enlarging versus Deepening!," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 51-66, January.
    6. Melle Marco C., 2014. "Eine europäische Bemessungsgrundlage für die Körperschaftsteuer? Konzeption und ordnungsökonomische Analyse / Conceptual design and constitutional economics analysis of a European tax base for corpora," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 133-156, January.
    7. Paul S. Kochanowski & Saul Pleeter, 1977. "Compensation With Induced Factor Movements in a Simple General Equilibrium Model," Public Finance Review, , vol. 5(1), pages 23-39, January.
    8. Miriam Hortas-Rico & Vicente Rios, 2020. "Is there an optimal size for local governments? A spatial panel data model approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 958-973, July.
    9. Vlad Tarko, 2021. "Local Accountability and National Coordination in Fiscal Federalism, by Charles Hankla, Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, and Raul Alberto Ponce Rodriguez," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 51(2), pages 16-16.
    10. Tanja A. Boerzel & Madeleine O. Hosli, 2002. "Comparative Federalism meets the European Union," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0007, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    11. Robert D. Tollison & Thomas D. Willett, 1978. "Fiscal Federalism: a Voting System Where Spillovers Taper Off Spatially," Public Finance Review, , vol. 6(3), pages 327-342, July.
    12. David Chicoine & Norman Walzer, 1986. "Factors affecting property tax reliance: Additional evidence," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 17-28, January.
    13. Harvey S. Perloff, 1973. "The Development of Urban Economics in the United States," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 289-301, October.
    14. Pommerehne, Werner W., 1976. "Quantitative aspects of federalism: A study of six countries," Discussion Papers, Series I 74, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    15. Blankart Charles B., 2017. "Lars P. Feld, Ekkehard A. Köhler und Jan Schnellenbach: Föderalismus und Subsidiarität," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 237(2), pages 143-146, April.
    16. Feld, Lars P. & Frey, Christian & Schaltegger, Christoph A. & Schmid, Lukas A., 2021. "Fiscal federalism and income inequality: An empirical analysis for Switzerland," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 463-494.
    17. Alain Marciano, 2019. "Buchanan and public finance: The tennessee years," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 21-46, March.
    18. Hans Pitlik & Klaus Wirth & Barbara Lehner, 2010. "Gemeindestruktur und Gemeindekooperation," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41359.
    19. Milan Jílek, 2015. "Factors of Tax Decentralization in OECD-Europe Countries," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 33-49.
    20. Robert W. Gilmer, 1976. "Tax Islands, Fiscal Equity, and Fiscal Equalization," Public Finance Review, , vol. 4(4), pages 479-492, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:3:y:1975:i:3:p:229-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.