IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v1y1973i2p85-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Decline and Possible Fall of PPBS

Author

Listed:
  • Robert L Harlow

    (Department of Economics College of the Holy Cross (Worcester, Mass.))

Abstract

The apparent failure of the Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS) to fulfill hopes for it in the federal government is examined in this article from the perspective of arguments surrounding its inception. It is argued that PPBS proponents had a naive conception of the political process, and that PPBS as an overall system has failed for precisely the reasons predicted by early critics. The productive aspects of the system do not require the overall framework to be useful, and, to the extent that improved budgeting is possible, it can be achieved in other ways more consistent with the actual structure of political decision-making in a world characterized by great complexity and disagreement about values.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert L Harlow, 1973. "On the Decline and Possible Fall of PPBS," Public Finance Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 85-106, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:1:y:1973:i:2:p:85-106
    DOI: 10.1177/109114217300100207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109114217300100207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/109114217300100207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur Maass, 1966. "Benefit-Cost Analysis: Its Relevance to Public Investment Decisions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 208-226.
    2. Davis, Otto A. & Dempster, M. A. H. & Wildavsky, Aaron, 1966. "A Theory of the Budgetary Process," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 60(3), pages 529-547, September.
    3. Charles E. Lindblom, 1961. "Decision-Making in Taxation and Expenditures," NBER Chapters, in: Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, pages 295-336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert L. Harlow, 1973. "On the Decline and Possible Fall of Ppbs," Public Finance Review, , vol. 1(1), pages 85-105, January.
    2. Valentino Larcinese & Leonzio Rizzo & Cecilia Testa, 2007. "Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 07/01, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised May 2007.
    3. Hannelore Weck-Hannemann, 1987. "Politisch-ökonomische Bestimmungsgründe der Vergabe von Entwicklungshilfe: Eine empirische Untersuchung für die Schweiz," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 123(IV), pages 501-529, December.
    4. Schneider, Andreas, 2019. "Deterrence Theory in Paraguay: Exploring Fraud and Violation of Trust Cases," MPRA Paper 102204, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Manuele Citi, 2015. "European Union budget politics: Explaining stability and change in spending allocations," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 260-280, June.
    6. A. Abigail Payne, 2003. "The Effects of Congressional Appropriation Committee Membership on the Distribution of Federal Research Funding to Universities," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(2), pages 325-345, April.
    7. Zhao, Jihong & Ren, Ling & Lovrich, Nicholas P., 2010. "Budgetary support for police services in U.S. municipalities: Comparing political culture, socioeconomic characteristics and incrementalism as rival explanations for budget share allocation to police," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 266-275, May.
    8. T Sager, 1981. "The Family of Goals-Achievement Matrix Methods: Respectable Enough for Citizen Participation in Planning?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(9), pages 1151-1161, September.
    9. G G Roy, 1974. "A Multiple Criteria Approach to Regional Planning Problems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 6(3), pages 313-320, June.
    10. Forsythe, G.A., 1975. "An Assessment Of The Role Of Insurance And Structural Measures In Flood Mitigation Planning," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(02), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Hans Rattinger, 1975. "Armaments, Detente, and Bureaucracy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(4), pages 571-595, December.
    12. Joubert, Alison R. & Leiman, Anthony & de Klerk, Helen M. & Katua, Stephen & Aggenbach, J. Coenrad, 1997. "Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 123-140, August.
    13. Min-Seok Pang & Ali Tafti & M. S. Krishnan, 2016. "Do CIO IT Budgets Explain Bigger or Smaller Governments? Theory and Evidence from U.S. State Governments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1020-1041, April.
    14. Ignacio Lago-Peñas & Santiago Lago-Peñas, "undated". "The Composition Of Public Spending And The Nationalization Of Party Systems In Western Europe," Working Papers 8-06 Classification-JEL :, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
    15. Cusack, Thomas R., 1987. "Public expenditure decision making: A comparative analysis," Discussion Papers, various Research Units FGG dp 87-1, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Michael Don Ward & A. K. Mahajan, 1984. "Defense Expenditures, Security Threats, and Governmental Deficits," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(3), pages 382-419, September.
    17. Stephen H. Linder & B. Guy Peters, 1990. "An Institutional Approach to the Theory of Policy-Making: The Role of Guidance Mechanisms in Policy Formulation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 2(1), pages 59-83, January.
    18. Edward J. Laurance, 1976. "The Changing Role of Congress in Defense Policy-Making," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 20(2), pages 213-252, June.
    19. Pavelis, George A., 1972. "Planning Natural Resource Development: An Introductory Guide," Miscellaneous Publications 321887, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Pavelis, George A., 1971. "The Benefit-Cost Ratio In Resource Development Planning," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:1:y:1973:i:2:p:85-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.