IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v6y2006i4p306-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourses of postmodern epistemology: radical impetus lost?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Müller

    (Department of Geography, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany and Development Studies Committee, University of Cambridge, UK)

Abstract

Exhibiting a highly divisive agenda postmodernism has created profound chasms across scientific communities. In development studies its radical impetus has translated into the postdevelopment perspective which violently repudiates the modernist development project. This paper crystallises two distinct discourses of working upon the epistemological raw material of postmodernism: an exclusivist discourse, which reinforces the chasm by isolating postmodernism, and an inclusivist discourse, which fosters mutual engagement between modernism and postmodernism. I contrast the trajectory of this inclusivist discourse in development studies to the hegemony of an exclusivist discourse in geography and find the preponderance of an inclusivist discourse to yield a higher radical potential and produce a kind of hybrid development research that is neither modern nor postmodern. Concluding I suggest that the relationship between modernism and postmodernism be thought of not in an exclusivist way as two competing paradigms, as it is often done, but rather as of two poles of negotiation between which a future sustained engagement should occur to enrich the theoretical and practical body of the discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Müller, 2006. "Discourses of postmodern epistemology: radical impetus lost?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(4), pages 306-320, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:6:y:2006:i:4:p:306-320
    DOI: 10.1191/1464993406ps145oa
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/1464993406ps145oa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1191/1464993406ps145oa?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Des Gasper, 1996. "Culture and Development Ethics: Needs, Women's Rights, and Western Theories," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 27(4), pages 627-661, October.
    2. John Rees, 1999. "research notes and comments: Regional science: From crisis to opportunity," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 78(1), pages 101-110.
    3. David Slater, 1992. "Theories of Development and Politics of the Post‐modern — Exploring a Border Zone," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 283-319, July.
    4. Ann Markusen, 2003. "Fuzzy Concepts, Scanty Evidence, Policy Distance: The Case for Rigour and Policy Relevance in Critical Regional Studies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 701-717.
    5. Alan Rew, 2003. "Why has it ended up here? Development (and other) messages and social connectivity in northern Orissa," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(7), pages 925-938.
    6. Stuart Corbridge, 1998. "'Beneath the pavement only soil': The poverty of post-development," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 138-148.
    7. David Lehmann, 1997. "An opportunity lost: Escobar's deconstruction of development," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 568-578.
    8. George N. Curry, 2003. "Moving Beyond Postdevelopment: Facilitating Indigenous Alternatives for “Development”," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(4), pages 405-423, October.
    9. Gunnar Olsson, 2000. "From a = b to a = a," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(7), pages 1235-1244, July.
    10. Michael Storper, 2001. "The Poverty of Radical Theory Today: From the False Promises of Marxism to the Mirage of the Cultural Turn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 155-179, March.
    11. Jan Nederveen Pieterse, 1998. "My Paradigm or Yours? Alternative Development, Post‐Development, Reflexive Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 29(2), pages 343-373, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Arsel & Aram Ziai, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 833-854, July.
    2. Murat Arsel & Navé Wald, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 618-643, July.
    3. Gephart, Malte, 2013. "Convergence, Divergence and a Complex Interplay: Chile and the International and Transnational Anti-Corruption Campaign," GIGA Working Papers 224, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Aram Ziai, 2019. "Gharbzadegi in Iran: A Reactionary Alternative to ‘Development’?," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 62(1), pages 160-166, December.
    5. David Simon, 2003. "Dilemmas of development and the environment in a globalizing world: theory, policy and praxis," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(1), pages 5-41, January.
    6. Piers Blaikie, 2000. "Development, Post-, Anti-, and Populist: A Critical Review," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(6), pages 1033-1050, June.
    7. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    8. Doloreux, David & Parto, Saeed, 2005. "Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153.
    9. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    11. Robert Hassink & Dong-Ho Shin, 2005. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(4), pages 571-580, April.
    12. Gordon Wilson, 2008. "Our knowledge ourselves: Engineers (re)thinking technology in development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(6), pages 739-750.
    13. Gary A S Cook & Naresh R Pandit & Jonathan V Beaverstock & Peter J Taylor & Kathy Pain, 2007. "The Role of Location in Knowledge Creation and Diffusion: Evidence of Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces in the City of London Financial Services Agglomeration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1325-1345, June.
    14. James Smith, 2005. "Context-bound knowledge production, capacity building and new product networks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 647-659.
    15. Al James, 2005. "Demystifying the role of culture in innovative regional economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 1197-1216.
    16. Ann Markusen & Gregory H. Wassall & Douglas DeNatale & Randy Cohen, 2008. "Defining the Creative Economy: Industry and Occupational Approaches," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(1), pages 24-45, February.
    17. James Rees & Alex Lord, 2013. "Making space: Putting politics back where it belongs in the construction of city regions in the North of England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 679-695, November.
    18. Zhenhua Chen & Laurie A. Schintler, 2023. "Rediscovering regional science: Positioning the field's evolving location in science and society," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(3), pages 617-642, June.
    19. Keshab Das, 2015. "Situating Labour in the Global Production Network Debate: As if the ‘South’ Mattered," Working Papers id:6665, eSocialSciences.
    20. Kajanus, Miika & Leban, Vasja & Glavonjić, Predrag & Krč, Janez & Nedeljković, Jelena & Nonić, Dragan & Nybakk, Erlend & Posavec, Stjepan & Riedl, Marcel & Teder, Meelis & Wilhelmsson, Erik & Zālīte, , 2019. "What can we learn from business models in the European forest sector: Exploring the key elements of new business model designs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 145-156.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:6:y:2006:i:4:p:306-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.