IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v23y2024i2p181-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zipper arguments and duties regarding future generations

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Meijers

Abstract

Most of us believe that it would be unjust to act with indifference about the plight of future generations. Zipper arguments in intergenerational justice aim to show that we have duties of justice regarding future generations, regardless of whether we have duties of justice to future generations. By doing so, such arguments circumvent the foundational challenges that come with theorising duties to remote future generations, which result from the non-existence, non-identity and non-contemporaneity of future generations. I argue that zipper arguments face several significant challenges. The ought-implies-can challenge points out that because prior generations determine what later generations can transfer, they determine how much they ought to transfer. In addition, both intentional and non-intentional non-compliance can break the chain of duties towards future generations on which zipper arguments rely. Some versions are surprisingly resilient especially in real-world circumstances. This paper does not show that zipper arguments inevitably fail, but all ways forward come at significant theoretical costs. Unless the challenges posed here are met (or shown as irrelevant), theorists of justice cannot side-track the foundational challenges that come with doing intergenerational justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Meijers, 2024. "Zipper arguments and duties regarding future generations," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 181-204, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:181-204
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X231185143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X231185143
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X231185143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckerman, Wilfred & Pasek, Joanna, 2001. "Justice, Posterity, and the Environment," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199245086.
    2. Axel Gosseries, 2014. "Nations, Generations and Climate Justice," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5(1), pages 96-102, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward A. Page, 2007. "Fairness on the Day after Tomorrow: Justice, Reciprocity and Global Climate Change," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 225-242, March.
    2. Marc David Davidson, 2021. "How Fairness Principles in the Climate Debate Relate to Theories of Distributive Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. repec:sae:envval:v:13:y:2004:i:4:p:421-448 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Janna Thompson, 2005. "Intergenerational Equity in an Ageing Society," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 83-96.
    5. Olivier Godard, 2011. "Climate justice, between global and international justice -Insights from justification theory," RSCAS Working Papers 2011/56, European University Institute.
    6. Mathew Humphrey, 2006. "Democratic Legitimacy, Public Justification and Environmental Direct Action," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(2), pages 310-327, June.
    7. Jin Xue & Finn Arler & Petter Næss, 2012. "Is the degrowth debate relevant to China?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 85-109, February.
    8. repec:sae:envval:v:22:y:2013:i:3:p:317-337 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Philippe Burny & Benon Gaziński & Lech Nieżurawski & Czesław Sobków, 2018. "Dynamics of the Implementation of the Concept of Sustainable Development in the European Union Countries," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 49, pages 163-176.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:181-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.