IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/polsoc/v28y2000i4p503-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Illusory Corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism and Postcommunist Class Identities

Author

Listed:
  • DAVID OST

Abstract

The plethora of tripartite bodies in postcommunist countries seems to suggest the emergence of an East European corporatism. Analysis of arrangements in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, and Poland indicates instead the prevalence of illusory corporatism. Token negotiations, nonbinding agreements, and exclusion of the private sector demonstrate that tripartite procedures are deployed to introduce neoliberal, not social democratic, outcomes. A path-dependent argument stressing labor's weak class identity best explains these outcomes. East European labor, unlike historic Western counterparts, is marked by a weak sense of class interests, disinclination to organize the private sector, and declining support from the workforce, making it unable to emerge as a strong force. It is not labor but the new elites that seek tripartism, hoping thereby to share burdens, conform to European norms, and demonstrate responsiveness to society. Formal tripartism also follows from the legacy of state socialism, giving symbolic voice to the formerly included now headed for exclusion. In the end, tripartism helps secure labor's acceptance of its own marginalization.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ost, 2000. "Illusory Corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism and Postcommunist Class Identities," Politics & Society, , vol. 28(4), pages 503-530, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:28:y:2000:i:4:p:503-530
    DOI: 10.1177/0032329200028004004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329200028004004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0032329200028004004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerber, Christine, 2014. "Trade union responses towards labour market dualization comparing the impact of the varieties of industrial relations in Germany, Slovenia and Poland," PIPE - Papers on International Political Economy 23/2014, Free University Berlin, Center for International Political Economy.
    2. Careja, Romana, 2007. "Are trade unions effective accounting actors?," SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 10(4), pages 83-106.
    3. Guglielmo Meardi, 2018. "Economic Integration and State Responses: Change in European Industrial Relations since Maastricht," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 631-655, September.
    4. Vliegenthart, Arjan, 2007. "Regulating employee representation in postsocialist supervisory boards," SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 10(4), pages 67-82.
    5. Amrita Chhachhi & Eli Friedman, 2014. "Alienated Politics: Labour Insurgency and the Paternalistic State in China," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 1001-1018, September.
    6. Rapacki, Ryszard & Gardawski, Juliusz & Czerniak, Adam & Horbaczewska, Bożena & Karbowski, Adam & Maszczyk, Piotr & Próchniak, Mariusz, 2018. "Wyłaniające się odmiany kapitalizmu w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej: przegląd badań [Emerging varieties of capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe: a review]," MPRA Paper 90363, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:28:y:2000:i:4:p:503-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.