IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v28y2024i2p204-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing Customers’ Buying Behaviour in E-tail Through Telepresence Evoked by Augmented Reality: The Mediating Role of Usefulness, Ease of Use and Enjoyment

Author

Listed:
  • Sarita Kumari
  • Vijay Rathee

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to investigate the influence of telepresence on customers’ ‘perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use, attitude towards augmented reality and intention’. It also measures the mediating effect of ‘perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use’ in influencing the relation between ‘telepresence and attitude’ and ‘telepresence and intention’. The technology acceptance model along with the telepresence concept was used to develop a conceptual framework. Data collection was done using convenience and snowball sampling techniques. Online customers from the Delhi NCR region of India were the targeted respondents and 321 responses were collected to test the hypotheses. Covariance-based structural equation modelling was applied to study the relation between different constructs. Findings showed that the four exogenous constructs ‘telepresence, perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use’ have significant influences on two endogenous constructs ‘attitudes towards AR’ and ‘intention’. Mediation results outlined that three mediating constructs ‘perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use’ have a significant specific indirect effect. It was a case of complementary partial mediation. The results altogether contribute to AR and sensory marketing literature and help marketers in decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarita Kumari & Vijay Rathee, 2024. "Influencing Customers’ Buying Behaviour in E-tail Through Telepresence Evoked by Augmented Reality: The Mediating Role of Usefulness, Ease of Use and Enjoyment," Paradigm, , vol. 28(2), pages 204-222, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:204-222
    DOI: 10.1177/09718907241286338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09718907241286338
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09718907241286338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Sang-Lin & An, Myounga & Han, Jerry J. & Lee, Jiyoung, 2020. "Telepresence, time distortion, and consumer traits of virtual reality shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 311-320.
    2. Sergio Barta & Raquel Gurrea & Carlos Flavián, 2023. "Telepresence in live-stream shopping: An experimental study comparing Instagram and the metaverse," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Algharabat, Raed & Abdallah Alalwan, Ali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2017. "Three dimensional product presentation quality antecedents and their consequences for online retailers: The moderating role of virtual product experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-217.
    4. Pantano, Eleonora & Rese, Alexandra & Baier, Daniel, 2017. "Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-95.
    5. Rese, Alexandra & Schreiber, Stefanie & Baier, Daniel, 2014. "Technology acceptance modeling of augmented reality at the point of sale: Can surveys be replaced by an analysis of online reviews?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 869-876.
    6. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    7. Kim, Jiyeon & Forsythe, Sandra, 2008. "Adoption of Virtual Try-on technology for online apparel shopping," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 45-59.
    8. Yan Peng & Dan Ke, 2015. "Consumer trust in 3D virtual worlds and its impact on real world purchase intention," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(4), pages 381-400, November.
    9. Yim, Mark Yi-Cheon & Chu, Shu-Chuan & Sauer, Paul L., 2017. "Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 89-103.
    10. Razia Sultana Sumi & Mahjabeen Ahmed, 2022. "Investigating young consumers’ online buying behavior in COVID-19 pandemic: perspective of Bangladesh," IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 108-123, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kowalczuk, Pascal & Siepmann (née Scheiben), Carolin & Adler, Jost, 2021. "Cognitive, affective, and behavioral consumer responses to augmented reality in e-commerce: A comparative study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 357-373.
    2. Stefan Hoffmann & Tom Joerß & Robert Mai & Payam Akbar, 2022. "Augmented reality-delivered product information at the point of sale: when information controllability backfires," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 743-776, July.
    3. Söderström, Charlotte & Mikalef, Patrick & Dypvik Landmark, Andreas & Gupta, Shivam, 2024. "Augmented reality (AR) marketing and consumer responses: A study of cue-utilization and habituation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Jayaswal, Pragya & Parida, Biswajita, 2023. "The role of augmented reality in redefining e-tailing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    6. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Vieira, Valter Afonso & Rafael, Diego Nogueira & Agnihotri, Raj, 2022. "Augmented reality generalizations: A meta-analytical review on consumer-related outcomes and the mediating role of hedonic and utilitarian values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 170-184.
    8. Nannan Xi & Juan Chen & Filipe Gama & Marc Riar & Juho Hamari, 2023. "The challenges of entering the metaverse: An experiment on the effect of extended reality on workload," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 659-680, April.
    9. Arghashi, Vahideh & Yuksel, Cenk Arsun, 2022. "Interactivity, Inspiration, and Perceived Usefulness! How retailers’ AR-apps improve consumer engagement through flow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Dehghani, Milad & Lee, Seung Hwan (Mark) & Mashatan, Atefeh, 2020. "Touching holograms with windows mixed reality: Renovating the consumer retailing services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Nawres, Darragi & Nedra, Bahri-Ammari & Yousaf, Anish & Mishra, Abhishek, 2024. "The role of augmented reality in shaping purchase intentions and WOM for luxury products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Ali Hassan Najmi & Waleed Salim Alhalafawy & Marwa Zaki Tawfiq Zaki, 2023. "Developing a Sustainable Environment Based on Augmented Reality to Educate Adolescents about the Dangers of Electronic Gaming Addiction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Bonnin, Gaël, 2020. "The roles of perceived risk, attractiveness of the online store and familiarity with AR in the influence of AR on patronage intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Qin, Hong & Osatuyi, Babajide & Xu, Lu, 2021. "How mobile augmented reality applications affect continuous use and purchase intentions: A cognition-affect-conation perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Petit, Olivia & Velasco, Carlos & Spence, Charles, 2019. "Digital Sensory Marketing: Integrating New Technologies Into Multisensory Online Experience," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-61.
    16. Poushneh, Atieh, 2018. "Augmented reality in retail: A trade-off between user's control of access to personal information and augmentation quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 169-176.
    17. Ogunjimi, Ayotunde & Rahman, Mizan & Islam, Nazrul & Hasan, Rajibul, 2021. "Smart mirror fashion technology for the retail chain transformation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Songhong Chen & Yuanshu Tian & Siyun Pei, 2024. "Technological Use from the Perspective of Cultural Heritage Environment: Augmented Reality Technology and Formation Mechanism of Heritage-Responsibility Behaviors of Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Sohn, Stefanie, 2017. "A contextual perspective on consumers' perceived usefulness: The case of mobile online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-33.
    20. Rodríguez-López, María Eugenia & Higueras-Castillo, Elena & Rojas-Lamorena, Álvaro J. & Alcántara-Pilar, Juan Miguel, 2024. "The future of TV-shopping: predicting user purchase intention through an extended technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:28:y:2024:i:2:p:204-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.