IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/metjou/v15y2016i2p91-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Priming of Gender and Coupling of Affect and Cognition in Anthropomorphic Stimulation

Author

Listed:
  • Sandeep Singh
  • Anand Sapre
  • Swati Kewlani

Abstract

Affect and cognition are two widely studied variables in researches concerned with behavioral science. This study assesses the relationship of these constructs in advertising. Earlier researches have considered these as either operating independently or as one acting as a precursor to the other. This study analyzes the findings of neuroscience in an experimental setting for anthropomorphic and unanthropomorphic advertisement. The study further looks into the moderating role of gender influence on priming, when exposed to advertisement. In consonance with the neurological advances, the author proposes a non-recursive model, showing intermodulation of affect and cognition. In this study 661 and 620 subjects were exposed to schema congruous anthropomorphic and unanthropomorphic advertisement respectively in a cross sectional study. The non recursive model for Cognitive and Affective priming was tested with polychoric correlation and asymptotic covariance as input matrix, with Robust Diagonally Weighted Least Square as estimation method using Lisrel 9.1 software. The findings of the study lend support to the recent advances of neuroscience that affect and cognition are mutually reinforcing for anthropomorphic treatment but not for unanthropomorphic advertisement. Findings also show that females are more affectively primed and male more cognitively primed on exposure to anthropomorphic advertisement.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Singh & Anand Sapre & Swati Kewlani, 2016. "Differential Priming of Gender and Coupling of Affect and Cognition in Anthropomorphic Stimulation," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 15(2), pages 91-101, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:15:y:2016:i:2:p:91-101
    DOI: 10.1177/0972622516675949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972622516675949
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972622516675949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmitt, Bernd H & Leclerc, France & Dube-Rioux, Laurette, 1988. "Sex Typing and Consumer Behavior: A Test of Gender Schema Theory," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(1), pages 122-128, June.
    2. Curry, David J & Menasco, Michael B, 1979. "Some Effects of Differing Information Processing Strategies on Husband-Wife Joint Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 6(2), pages 192-203, Se.
    3. Meyers-Levy, Joan & Tybout, Alice M, 1989. "Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(1), pages 39-54, June.
    4. Jekaterina Rogaten & Giovanni Moneta & Marcantonio Spada, 2013. "Academic Performance as a Function of Approaches to Studying and Affect in Studying," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1751-1763, December.
    5. Hoch, Stephen J & Loewenstein, George F, 1991. "Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(4), pages 492-507, March.
    6. Pankaj Aggarwal & Ann L. McGill, 2007. "Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 468-479, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anant Jyoti Badgaiyan & Saumya Dixit & Anshul Verma, 2017. "If brands are people, then people are impulsive—assessing the connection between brand personality and impulsive buying behaviour," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(6), pages 622-638, November.
    2. Theodore J Noseworthy & Kyle B Murray & Fabrizio Di Muro & Gita JoharEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2018. "When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Using Conjunctive Enablers to Enhance Evaluations for Extremely Incongruent New Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1379-1396.
    3. Eliza K. Dehay & Jan R. Landwehr, 2019. "A MAP for effective advertising: the metaphoric advertising processing model," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 289-303, December.
    4. Ketron, Seth & Spears, Nancy, 2020. "Schema-ing with color and temperature: The effects of color-temperature congruity and the role of non-temperature associations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Gretry, Anaïs & Horváth, Csilla & Belei, Nina & van Riel, Allard C.R., 2017. "“Don't pretend to be my friend!” When an informal brand communication style backfires on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-89.
    6. Moritz Jörling & Robert Böhm & Stefanie Paluch, 2020. "Mechanisms and Consequences of Anthropomorphizing Autonomous Products," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 485-510, October.
    7. Chu, Kyounghee & Lee, Do-Hee & Kim, Ji Yoon, 2019. "The effect of verbal brand personification on consumer evaluation in advertising: Internal and external personification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-480.
    8. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    9. Irina Heimbach & Oliver Hinz, 2018. "The Impact of Sharing Mechanism Design on Content Sharing in Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 592-611, September.
    10. Aubel Martin & Pikturniene Indre & Joye Yannick, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Response to Service Robot Anthropomorphism in Banking," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 26-42, June.
    11. Sohyun Bae, 2021. "Holding an entity mind-set deters consumption of recycled content products: the role of perceived product quality," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(4), pages 553-571, December.
    12. Rik Pieters & Michel Wedel, 2012. "Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 59-73, January.
    13. Elizabeth G. Pontikes & William P. Barnett, 2015. "The Persistence of Lenient Market Categories," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1415-1431, October.
    14. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Haewon Yoon, 2020. "Impatience and Time Inconsistency in Discounting Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5850-5860, December.
    16. Manel Baucells & Silvia Bellezza, 2017. "Temporal Profiles of Instant Utility During Anticipation, Event, and Recall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(3), pages 729-748, March.
    17. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    18. Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr. & Shaw, W. Douglass & Silva, Andres, 2006. "The Effect of Risk Presentation on Product Valuation: An Experimental Analysis," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21429, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Wardley, Marcus & Alberhasky, Max, 2021. "Framing zero: Why losing nothing is better than gaining nothing," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Sheng, Shibin & Pan, Yue, 2009. "Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: The role of brand image and bundle features," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 367-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:15:y:2016:i:2:p:91-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.