IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v41y2021i4p393-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value of Triage during Periods of Intense COVID-19 Demand: Simulation Modeling Study

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Wood

    (Modelling and Analytics, UK National Health Service (BNSSG CCG), UK
    Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement (CHI2), School of Management; University of Bath, Bath, UK
    Health Data Research UK South West Better Care Partnership, UK)

  • Adrian C. Pratt

    (Modelling and Analytics, UK National Health Service (BNSSG CCG), UK)

  • Charlie Kenward

    (Clinical Effectiveness, UK National Health Service (BNSSG CCG), UK)

  • Christopher J. McWilliams

    (Health Data Research UK South West Better Care Partnership, UK
    Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, UK)

  • Ross D. Booton

    (Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, UK)

  • Matthew J. Thomas

    (Intensive Care Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK)

  • Christopher P. Bourdeaux

    (Health Data Research UK South West Better Care Partnership, UK
    Intensive Care Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK)

  • Christos Vasilakis

    (Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement (CHI2), School of Management; University of Bath, Bath, UK
    Health Data Research UK South West Better Care Partnership, UK)

Abstract

Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, many intensive care units have been overwhelmed by unprecedented levels of demand. Notwithstanding ethical considerations, the prioritization of patients with better prognoses may support a more effective use of available capacity in maximizing aggregate outcomes. This has prompted various proposed triage criteria, although in none of these has an objective assessment been made in terms of impact on number of lives and life-years saved. Design An open-source computer simulation model was constructed for approximating the intensive care admission and discharge dynamics under triage. The model was calibrated from observational data for 9505 patient admissions to UK intensive care units. To explore triage efficacy under various conditions, scenario analysis was performed using a range of demand trajectories corresponding to differing nonpharmaceutical interventions. Results Triaging patients at the point of expressed demand had negligible effect on deaths but reduces life-years lost by up to 8.4% (95% confidence interval: 2.6% to 18.7%). Greater value may be possible through “reverse triage†, that is, promptly discharging any patient not meeting the criteria if admission cannot otherwise be guaranteed for one who does. Under such policy, life-years lost can be reduced by 11.7% (2.8% to 25.8%), which represents 23.0% (5.4% to 50.1%) of what is operationally feasible with no limit on capacity and in the absence of improved clinical treatments. Conclusions The effect of simple triage is limited by a tradeoff between reduced deaths within intensive care (due to improved outcomes) and increased deaths resulting from declined admission (due to lower throughput given the longer lengths of stay of survivors). Improvements can be found through reverse triage, at the expense of potentially complex ethical considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Wood & Adrian C. Pratt & Charlie Kenward & Christopher J. McWilliams & Ross D. Booton & Matthew J. Thomas & Christopher P. Bourdeaux & Christos Vasilakis, 2021. "The Value of Triage during Periods of Intense COVID-19 Demand: Simulation Modeling Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(4), pages 393-407, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:393-407
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X21994035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X21994035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X21994035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard M Wood & Christopher J McWilliams & Matthew J Thomas & Christopher P Bourdeaux & Christos Vasilakis, 2020. "COVID-19 scenario modelling for the mitigation of capacity-dependent deaths in intensive care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 315-324, September.
    2. Amin Mahmoudian-Dehkordi & Somayeh Sadat, 2017. "Sustaining critical care: using evidence-based simulation to evaluate ICU management policies," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 532-547, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina C. Bartenschlager & Milena Grieger & Johanna Erber & Tobias Neidel & Stefan Borgmann & Jörg J. Vehreschild & Markus Steinbrecher & Siegbert Rieg & Melanie Stecher & Christine Dhillon & Maria, 2023. "Covid-19 triage in the emergency department 2.0: how analytics and AI transform a human-made algorithm for the prediction of clinical pathways," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 412-429, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G.J. Melman & A.K. Parlikad & E.A.B. Cameron, 2021. "Balancing scarce hospital resources during the COVID-19 pandemic using discrete-event simulation," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 356-374, June.
    2. Linying Yang & Teng Zhang & Peter Glynn & David Scheinker, 2021. "The development and deployment of a model for hospital-level COVID-19 associated patient demand intervals from consistent estimators (DICE)," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 375-401, June.
    3. Costase Ndayishimiye & Christoph Sowada & Patrycja Dyjach & Agnieszka Stasiak & John Middleton & Henrique Lopes & Katarzyna Dubas-Jakóbczyk, 2022. "Associations between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Hospital Infrastructure Adaptation and Planning—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Akira Watanabe & Hiroyuki Matsuda, 2023. "Effectiveness of feedback control and the trade-off between death by COVID-19 and costs of countermeasures," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 46-61, March.
    5. Samantha L. Zimmerman & Alexander R. Rutherford & Alexa Waall & Monica Norena & Peter Dodek, 2023. "A queuing model for ventilator capacity management during the COVID-19 pandemic," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 200-216, June.
    6. Berta, P. & Bratti, M. & Fiorio, C.V. & Pisoni, E. & Verzillo, S., 2021. "Administrative border effects in Covid-19 related mortality," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 21/21, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    7. Eugenio F. Sánchez-Úbeda & Pedro Sánchez-Martín & Macarena Torrego-Ellacuría & Ángel Del Rey-Mejías & Manuel F. Morales-Contreras & José-Luis Puerta, 2021. "Flexibility and Bed Margins of the Community of Madrid’s Hospitals during the First Wave of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Richard M Wood & Christopher J McWilliams & Matthew J Thomas & Christopher P Bourdeaux & Christos Vasilakis, 2020. "COVID-19 scenario modelling for the mitigation of capacity-dependent deaths in intensive care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 315-324, September.
    9. Jaén, Sebastián, 2024. "The decrease of ED patient boarding by implementing a stock management policy in hospital admissions," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 12(C).
    10. Ortiz-Barrios, Miguel & Arias-Fonseca, Sebastián & Ishizaka, Alessio & Barbati, Maria & Avendaño-Collante, Betty & Navarro-Jiménez, Eduardo, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and discrete-event simulation for capacity management of intensive care units during the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske & Silvio Bicciato, 2022. "COVID-19 health policy evaluation: integrating health and economic perspectives with a data envelopment analysis approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(8), pages 1263-1285, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:41:y:2021:i:4:p:393-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.