IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v33y2013i5p597-606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Dias
  • Nicky J. Welton
  • Alex J. Sutton
  • A. E. Ades

Abstract

We introduce the series of 7 tutorial papers on evidence synthesis methods for decision making, based on the Technical Support Documents in Evidence Synthesis prepared for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Decision Support Unit. Although oriented to NICE’s Technology Appraisal process, which examines new pharmaceutical products in a cost-effectiveness framework, the methods presented throughout the tutorials are equally relevant to clinical guideline development and to comparisons between medical devices, or public health interventions. Detailed guidance is given on how to use the other tutorials in the series, which propose a single evidence synthesis framework that covers fixed and random effects models, pairwise meta-analysis, indirect comparisons, and network meta-analysis, and where outcomes expressed in several different reporting formats can be analyzed without recourse to normal approximations. We describe the principles of evidence synthesis required by the 2008 revision of the NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal and explain how the approach proposed in these tutorials was designed to conform to those requirements. We finish with some suggestions on how to present the evidence, the synthesis methods, and the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Dias & Nicky J. Welton & Alex J. Sutton & A. E. Ades, 2013. "Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(5), pages 597-606, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:597-606
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X13487604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X13487604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X13487604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eliano P Navarese & Paul A Gurbel & Felicita Andreotti & Michalina Marta Kołodziejczak & Suetonia C Palmer & Sofia Dias & Antonino Buffon & Jacek Kubica & Mariusz Kowalewski & Tomasz Jadczyk & Michał , 2017. "Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures-a systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Mohamed A. Hassan & Wenxi Liu & Daniel J. McDonough & Xiwen Su & Zan Gao, 2022. "Comparative Effectiveness of Physical Activity Intervention Programs on Motor Skills in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Dipen A Patel & Sonya J Snedecor & Wing Yu Tang & Lavanya Sudharshan & Jessica W Lim & Robert Cuffe & Sonia Pulgar & Kim A Gilchrist & Rodrigo Refoios Camejo & Jennifer Stephens & Garrett Nichols, 2014. "48-Week Efficacy and Safety of Dolutegravir Relative to Commonly Used Third Agents in Treatment-Naive HIV-1–Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Benjamin Castagné & Marie Viprey & Julie Martin & Anne-Marie Schott & Michel Cucherat & Martin Soubrier, 2019. "Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Panagiotis Petrou, 2019. "Seeking to introduce a pharmacoeconomics framework in Cyprus," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 309-310, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:597-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.