IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0168726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures-a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Eliano P Navarese
  • Paul A Gurbel
  • Felicita Andreotti
  • Michalina Marta Kołodziejczak
  • Suetonia C Palmer
  • Sofia Dias
  • Antonino Buffon
  • Jacek Kubica
  • Mariusz Kowalewski
  • Tomasz Jadczyk
  • Michał Laskiewicz
  • Marek Jędrzejek
  • Maximillian Brockmeyer
  • Flavio Airoldi
  • Marinella Ruospo
  • Stefano De Servi
  • Wojciech Wojakowski
  • Christopher O’ Connor
  • Giovanni F M Strippoli

Abstract

Background: Interventional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring intravascular iodinated contrast steadily increase patient exposure to the risks of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI), which is associated with death, nonfatal cardiovascular events, and prolonged hospitalization. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for CIAKI prevention in patients undergoing cardiovascular invasive procedures with iodinated contrast. Methods and findings: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as abstracts and presentations from major cardiovascular and nephrology meetings were searched, up to 22 April 2016. Eligible studies were randomized trials comparing strategies to prevent CIAKI (alone or in combination) when added to saline versus each other, saline, placebo, or no treatment in patients undergoing cardiovascular invasive procedures with administration of iodinated contrast. Two reviewers independently extracted trial-level data including number of patients, duration of follow-up, and outcomes. Eighteen strategies aimed at CIAKI prevention were identified. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CIAKI. Secondary outcomes were mortality, myocardial infarction, dialysis and heart failure. The data were pooled using network meta-analysis. Treatment estimates were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). 147 RCTs involving 33,463 patients were eligible. Saline plus N-acetylcysteine (OR 0.72, 95%CrI 0.57–0.88), ascorbic acid (0.59, 0.34–0.95), sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine (0.59, 0.36–0.89), probucol (0.42, 0.15–0.91), methylxanthines (0.39, 0.20–0.66), statin (0.36, 0.21–0.59), device-guided matched hydration (0.35, 0.12–0.79), prostaglandins (0.26, 0.08–0.62) and trimetazidine (0.26, 0.09–0.59) were associated with lower odds of CIAKI compared to saline. Methylxanthines (0.12, 0.01–0.94) or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure-guided hydration (0.09, 0.01–0.59) were associated with lower mortality compared to saline. Conclusions: Currently recommended treatment with saline as the only measure to prevent CIAKI during cardiovascular procedures may not represent the optimal strategy. Vasodilators, when added to saline, may significantly reduce the odds of CIAKI following cardiovascular procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliano P Navarese & Paul A Gurbel & Felicita Andreotti & Michalina Marta Kołodziejczak & Suetonia C Palmer & Sofia Dias & Antonino Buffon & Jacek Kubica & Mariusz Kowalewski & Tomasz Jadczyk & Michał , 2017. "Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures-a systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0168726
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168726&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0168726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sofia Dias & Nicky J. Welton & Alex J. Sutton & A. E. Ades, 2013. "Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(5), pages 597-606, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin Castagné & Marie Viprey & Julie Martin & Anne-Marie Schott & Michel Cucherat & Martin Soubrier, 2019. "Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Panagiotis Petrou, 2019. "Seeking to introduce a pharmacoeconomics framework in Cyprus," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 309-310, April.
    3. Mohamed A. Hassan & Wenxi Liu & Daniel J. McDonough & Xiwen Su & Zan Gao, 2022. "Comparative Effectiveness of Physical Activity Intervention Programs on Motor Skills in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Dipen A Patel & Sonya J Snedecor & Wing Yu Tang & Lavanya Sudharshan & Jessica W Lim & Robert Cuffe & Sonia Pulgar & Kim A Gilchrist & Rodrigo Refoios Camejo & Jennifer Stephens & Garrett Nichols, 2014. "48-Week Efficacy and Safety of Dolutegravir Relative to Commonly Used Third Agents in Treatment-Naive HIV-1–Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-10, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0168726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.